Skip to main content

Building an Ethics of Visual Representation: Contesting Epistemic Closure in Marketing Communication

  • Chapter
Cutting-edge issues in Business Ethics

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 24))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmed, S. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcoff, L. M. 1999. “Towards a phenomenology of racial embodiment”, Radical Philosophy, Vol. 95, May/June, pp. 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. 1991. Femininity and Domination, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L. 1993. Rethinking Ethics in the Midst of Violence: A Feminist Approach to Freedom, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, W. 2001. Advertising Today, Phaidon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. 1997. Twilight Zones: The Hidden Life of Cultural Images from Plato to O.J., University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, J. 2001. “Feminist ethical ontology: contesting ‘the bare givenness of intersubjectivity”’, Feminist Theory, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, J. 2005a. “Judith Butler: Organizing Subjectivities”, Sociological Review, Vol. 53, pp. 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, J. 2005b. “Addressing the Global Basic Structure in the Ethics of International Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects”, Journal of Philosophical Research, special supplement: 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, J. 2007. “On the Harmony of Feminist Ethics and Business Ethics”, Business and Society, Vol. 112 No. 4, pp. 477–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, J. L. and Schroeder, J. E. 2002. “Ethical Issues of Gobal Marketing: Avoiding Bad Faith in Visual Representation”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36 Nos. 5/6, pp. 570–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, J. and Schroeder, J. 2005. “Identity in Marketing Communications: An Ethics of Visual Representation,” in Marketing Communication: Emerging Trends and Developments, Allan J. Kimmel, (Ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 256–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristor, J., Lee, R. G. and Hunt, M. 1995. “Race and ideology: African American images in television advertising”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 14, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. 1995. Postmodern Marketing, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1999/1987. Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadava, E. 1999. Words of Light: Theses on the Photography of History, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, C. 1996. The Unnatural Lottery: Character and Moral Luck, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, C. 2002. The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortese, A. J. 1999. Provocateur: Images of Women and Minorities in Advertising, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, J. and Borgerson, J. 1999. “Tracing parallel oppressions: a feminist ontology of women and animals”, Feminista! Vol. 3, online: http://www.feminista.com/v3n4/coviello.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. and Matten, D. 2007. Business Ethics: A European Perspective, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. A, and Linden, T. (Eds.), 1998. Ethics of Consumption: The Good Life, Justice and Global Stewardship, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A. 1997. Sponsored Identities: Cultural Politics in Puerto Rico, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lauretis, T. 1987. “The technology of gender”, in T. De Lauretis(ed.) Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film and Fiction, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. 1984. Kant’s Critical Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, J. C. 1999. Staging Tourism: Bodies on Display From Waikiki to Sea World, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, M. E. and Murphy, P. E. 2004. “How advertising practitioners view ethics: moral muteness, moral myopia, and moral imagination”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks, Grove Press, New York, trans. Markmann, C. L.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, A. F. and Shultz, C. J. II 1997. “From segmentation to fragmentation: markets and marketing strategy in the postmodern era”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31, pp. 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firat, A. F. and Venkatesh, A. 1993. “Postmodernity: the age of marketing”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 10, pp. 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. 1994. Disturbing Pleasures: Learning Popular Culture, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1979. Gender Advertisements, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. T. 1993. Racist Culture: Philosophy and the Politics of Meaning, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R. 1992. Reading Ads Socially, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R. and Papson, S. 1996. Sign Wars: The Cluttered Landscape of Advertising, Guilford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. 1995 .Bad Faith and Antiblack Racism, Humanities Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. 1997. Her Majesty’s Other Children: Sketches of Racism from a NeocolonialAge, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. 1999. “Philosophy of existence”, in Glendenning, S.(Ed.), Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 101–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, L. 1988. “The ethics of (mis) representation”, in Gross, L.,Katz, J. S. and Ruby, J. (Eds.), Image Ethics, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 188–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillet de Monthoux, P. 1993. The Moral Philosophy of Management: From Quesnay to Keynes. M. E. Sharpe, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackley, C. 2005. Advertising and Promotion: Communicating Brands. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (Ed.) 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, Open University Press Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanke, R. 1992. “Redesigning men: Hegemonic masculinity in transition.” In S. Craig , (Ed.), Men, Masculinity and the Media. Sage, London, pp. 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. Z. 1998. “Ecofeminism and nonhumans: continuity,difference, dualism, and domination”, Hypatia, Vol. 13, pp. 158–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. 1993. Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics, Penguin, London, trans. B. Bosanquet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. 1986. “Humanistic inquiry in marketing research: philosophy, method, and criteria”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 23, pp. 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. 2002. “Why Do Brands Cause Trouble?”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 29, pp. 70–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupfer, M. 1997. “A pluralistic approach to visual communication: reviewing rhetoric and representation in World War I posters”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 24, pp. 322–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, J. A. 1997. “Black feminism: liberation limbos and existencein gray” in Gordon, L. R. (Ed.), Existence in Black, Routledge, New York, pp. 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. and Munro, R. (Eds.) 2005. Contemporary Organization Theory, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Parker, M., and ten Bos, R. 2005. For Business Ethics, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1960. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime, University of California Press, Berkeley, trans, J. T. Goldthwait.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1973/1790. Critique of Judgment, Oxford University Press, Oxford, trans. J. C. Meredith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. and Pease, D. E. (Eds.) 1993. Cultures of United States Imperialism, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. M. 2002. “Photographic Images of Gender and Race in Fortune500 Company Websites in the United States”, Business Research Yearbook, Vol. 7, pp. 852–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiss, W., Kline, S. and Jhally, S. 1990. Social Communication in Advertising, 2nd ed.Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppert, R. 1997. Art and the Committed Eye: The Cultural Functions of Imagery, Westview/HarperCollins, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippke, R. 1995. Radical Business Ethics, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. 1988. Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. 2000. Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist adSocial Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuarrie, E. F. and Mick, D. G. 1999. “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses”, Journal of Consumer Research,Vol. 26, pp. 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messaris, P. 1997. Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1994. “Ontology and style”, in Friedman, J. (Ed.),Consumption and Identity, Harwood, Amsterdam, pp. 71–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff, N. 1999. An Introduction to Visual Culture, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natanson, M. 1986. Anonymity: A Study in the Philosophy of Alfred Schutz, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times News Service, 1999. “Benetton Peers into Death Row”, International Herald Tribune, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K. 2001. Witnessing: Beyond Recognition, University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Barr, W. M., 1994. Culture and the Ad: Exploring Otherness in the World of Advertising, Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R. 1999. “Advertising: Critical Analysis of Images” in Parker, I. (Ed.), Critical Textwork: An Introduction toVarieties of Discourse and Analysis, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pracejus, J. W., Olson, D. C., and O’Guinn, T. C. 2006. “How Nothing Became Something: White Space, History, Meaning and Rhetoric”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 23, pp. 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, P. 1994. They Must Be Represented: The Politics of Documentary, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy, A. 1997. “Constructions of Illusion: Photography and Commodity Culture”, in Wells, L. (Ed.), Photography: A Critical Introduction, Routledge, London, pp. 151–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy, A. 2004. “Spectacles and Illusions: Photography and Commodity Culture”, in Wells, L. (Ed.), Photography: A Critical Introduction, 3rd edition, Routledge, London, pp. 193–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. and Nisbett, R. E. 1991., The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. 1956. Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology, Washington Square Press, New York, trans. H. Barnes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. 1998. “Consuming Representation: A Visual Approach to Consumer Research”, in Stern, B. B. (Ed.), Representing Consumers: Voices, Views and Visions, Routledge, London, pp. 193–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. 2002. Visual Consumption, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. 2007. “Images in Brand Culture” in Phillips, B. J., and McQuarrie (Eds.) Go Figure: New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. and Borgerson, J. L. 1998. “Marketing images of gender: a visual analysis”, Consumption, Markets, and Culture, Vol. 2, pp. 161–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. and Borgerson, J. L. 2002. “Innovations in information technology: insights from Italian Renaissance Art”, Consumption, Markets, and Culture, 5(2), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. and Borgerson, J. L. 2003. “Dark desires: fetishism, ontology and representation in contemporary advertising”, in Reichert, T. and Lambiase, J. (Eds.) Sexual Appeals in Advertising: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Erotic Appeal, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. and Borgerson, J. L. 2004. “Judith Butler, Gender Theorist: Philosophical and Phenomenological Insights into Marketing and Consumer Behavior,” in Thompson, C. J. and Scott, L. M. (Eds.) Association for Consumer Research conference on Gender, Marketing and Consumer Behavior proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. and Borgerson, J. L. 2005. “An Ethics of Representation for International Marketing Communication”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 578–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E. and Zwick, D. 2004. “Mirrors of Masculinity: Representation and Identity in Advertising Images”, Consumption, Markets and Culture, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 21–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. and Su, C. 2000. “The ethics of consumer sovereignty in an age of high tech”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 28, pp. 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C. and Quelch, J. A. 1993. Ethics in Marketing, Irwin, Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. 1993. “Business Ethics”, in Singer, P. (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pp. 354–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. 1993. “Feminist literary criticism and the deconstruction of ads: a postmodern view of advertising and consumer research”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19, pp. 556–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. B. 1998. “Introduction: the problematics of representation”, in Stern, B. B. (Ed.), Representing Consumers: Voices, Views, and Visions, Routledge, New York, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J. 2004. “Dreams of Eden: A Critical Reader-Response Analysis of the Mytho-Ideologies encoded in Natural Health Advertisements”, in Ekström, K. and Brembeck, H. (eds.), Elusive Consumption, Berg, Oxford, pp. 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J. 1997. “Interpreting consumers: a hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers’ consumption stories”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34, pp. 438–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B. and Pollio, H. R. 1989. “Putting the Consumer Back into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp. 133–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. U. 1998. Moral Understandings: Feminist Studies in Ethics, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. (Ed.) 1997; 2004. Photography: A Critical Introduction, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, A. 1992. Toward Better Problems, Philadelphia, PA, Temple UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. 1987. The Destruction of Black Civilization, Third World Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. 1978. Decoding Advertisements, Marion Boyers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, H. 1999. Displacing Natives: The Rhetorical Production of Hawai’i, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G. 2002. How Customers Think, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borgerson, J.L., Schroeder, J.E. (2008). Building an Ethics of Visual Representation: Contesting Epistemic Closure in Marketing Communication. In: Cutting-edge issues in Business Ethics. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8401-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics