Skip to main content

Rationality of Moral Judgments

  • Chapter
On Law and Reason

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 8))

  • 168 Accesses

Abstract

At first, I must return to the preliminary question, Why not to assume that legal conclusions can be true, even if they are fully justifiable only by a set of premises containing a norm or a value judgment? Such an assumption implies another one, namely that norms or value judgments themselves possess truth values. This is, of course, the central problem of value theory. Let me thus make some observations, belonging to this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peczenik, A. (1989). Rationality of Moral Judgments. In: On Law and Reason. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8381-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8381-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-0444-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8381-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics