Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Progress in Biological Control ((PIBC,volume 5))

Abstract

Political, economic, social and biological forces have altered agricultural practices in the last several decades. One result has been the development of transgenic maize and cotton varieties expressing insecticidal proteins from the bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which have become important components in IPM programs globally. In 2007, Bt maize and Bt cotton were grown in 13 and 9 countries, respectively. Bt plants have provided simultaneous opportunities and challenges to managing insect pest complexes, but overall their use has resulted in strong economic and environmental benefits. Their adoption rate has been dramatic. In only the 12th year after their introduction, they were grown on 42.1 million hectares in 2007. Thus, Bt plants have turned what was once a minor foliar insecticide (Bt) into a major control strategy. Other Bt commodities are expected to be registered in the near future. Additionally, new insecticide molecules are being developed for expression in plants and plant genes are being altered to affect biochemical pathways that elicit insect resistance. However, adoption of Bt plants should be viewed within the larger context of food systems, cultures, human values, politics and the roles and responsibilities of science in the modern world. Such a context helps explain the variable adoption rates of Bt plants on a global basis and helps provide insights for the future deployment of insect-resistant plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bates, S.L., Zhao, J.-Z., Roush, R.T., and Shelton, A.M., 2005. Insect resistance management in GM crops: Past, present and future. Nature Biotechnology 23: 57–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, G., and Barfoot, P., 2006a. Global impact of biotech crops: Socio-economic and environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum 9: 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, G., and Barfoot, P., 2006b. GM Crops: The First Ten Years – Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts. ISAAA Brief No. 36, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R., 1962. Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD Secretariat, 2000. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Zhao, J.-Z., Colins, H.L., Earle, E.D., Cao, J., and Shelton, A.M., 2008. A critical assessment of the effects of Bt transgenic plants on parasitoids. PLoS ONE 3(5): e2284. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, G., 1997. Forgotten benefactor of humanity. The Atlantic Monthly 279: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goklany, I., 2002. From precautionary principle to risk-risk analysis. Nature Biotechnology 20: 1075.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, R.J., 2007a. Stealth seeds: Bioproperty, biosafety and biopolitics. Journal of Development Studies 43: 130–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, R.J., 2007b. Suicide seeds? Biotechnology meets the development state. http://casi.ssc.upenn.edu/india/index.html (accessed 11 January 2008).

  • Hesser, L., 2006. The man who fed the world: Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Norman Borlaug and his battle to end world hunger. Durban House Publishing, Dallas, TX, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C., 2007. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2007. ISAAA Brief No. 37, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.L., Raybould, A.F., Hudson, M.D., and Poppy, G.M., 2007. How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis? Trends in Plant Sciences 12: 1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelves, D.J., 2001. The battle over biotechnology. In: Days of Destiny, Crossroads in American History, D. Rubel, ed., DK Publishing, New York, USA, pp. 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., and Tette, J., 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin. NYS Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA. http://www.nysipm.cornell.edu/publications/eiq/ (accessed 6 January 2008).

  • Marvier, M., McCreedy, C., Regetz, J., and Kareiva, P., 2007. A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates. Science 316: 1475–1477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan, M., Glare, T.R., Burgess, E.P.J., and Malone, L.A., 2005. Effects of plants genetically modified for insect resistance on nontarget organisms. Annual Review of Entomology 50: 271–292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg, R., 2007. Keeping genetically engineered crops out of Africa (Abstract). Workshop on contentious knowledge and the diffusion of social protest. http://www.socialsciences.cornell.edu/0609/Diffusion.html#Agenda/ (accessed 6 January 2008).

  • Painter, R.H., 1951. Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybould, A., 2007. Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Science 173: 589–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romeis, J., Meissle M., and Bigler, F., 2006. Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nature Biotechnology 24: 63–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romeis, J., Bartsch, D., Bigler, F., Candolfi, M.P., Gielkens, M.M.C., Hartley, S.E., Hellmich, R.L., Huesing, J.E., Jepson, P.C., Layton, R., Quemada, H., Raybould, A., Rose, R.I., Schiemann, J., Sears, M.K., Shelton, A.M., Sweet, J., Vaituzis, Z., and Wolt, J.D., 2008. Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods. Nature Biotechnology 26: 203–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanvido, O., Romeis, J., and Bigler, F., 2007. Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: Ten years of field research and commercial cultivation. Advances in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology 107: 235–278.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A.M., and Sears, M.K., 2001. The monarch butterfly controversy: Scientific interpretations of a phenomenon. The Plant Journal 27: 483–488.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A.M., Zhao, J.-Z., and Roush, R.T., 2002a. Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annual Review of Entomology 47: 845–881.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A.M., McCandless, L., Lewenstein, B., Hawkes, J., Lyson, T., Bauman, T., and Aldwinckle, H. 2002b. Agricultural biotechnology: Informing the dialogue, 2002. Available online at http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/comm/gmo/ (accessed 6 January 2008).

  • Stern, V.M., Smith, R.F., van den Bosch, R., and Hagen, K., 1959. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29: 81–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B.E., Carrière, Y., Dennehy, T.J., Morin, S., Sisterson, M.S., Roush, R.T., Shelton, A.M., and Zhao, J.Z., 2003. Insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops: Lessons from the laboratory and field. Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 1031–1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.A., 2008. The role of biotechnology for agricultural sustainability in Africa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 905–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Emden, H.F., and Peakall, D.B., eds., 1996. Beyond Silent Spring: Integrated Pest Management and Chemical Safety. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony M. Shelton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shelton, A.M., Romeis, J., Kennedy, G.G. (2008). IPM and Insect-Protected Transgenic Plants: Thoughts for the Future. In: Romeis, J., Shelton, A.M., Kennedy, G.G. (eds) Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs. Progress in Biological Control, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8373-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics