Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Time With and Without Tense

  • Chapter
Time and Modality

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 75))

Abstract

How is temporal information conveyed in language? Do tenses code temporal information directly? Does the universality of temporal interpretations arise from a common syntactic structure necessarily including a Tense Phrase (TP)? From the study of tenseless languages and mixed-temporal languages such as Mandarin Chinese and Navajo, this article addresses fundamental questions about the grammaticalization of time. It is proposed that two simple pragmatic principles constrain direct temporal interpretation in languages with tense (English, French), and guide indirect temporal interpretation in languages without tense: (i) the default intepretation of present tense sentences as located in the present, (ii) the ‘Bounded Event Constraint’, i.e. the fact that bounded events cannot be located at Speech Time. A more general principle of Simplicity ensures that Present takes precedence over the Future (as futurity is never a ‘purely temporal’ concept). According to this view, a few very general grammatical principles account for temporal interpretation in both tensed and tenseless languages. The syntax of fully-tensed languages includes a TP, conveying direct information about temporal location. The other types of languages have an Aspect Phrase, but no TP. Aspectual information about boundedness and information about internal temporal properties (Static/Dynamic, Telic/Atelic, Durative/Punctual), coupled with the invariant pragmatic principles, suffice to derive temporal interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bach, Emmon, 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9:5-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnemeyer, J ürgen, 2003. Relative tenses vs. aspect: the case reopened. Semantics of Under-represented Languages 2, handout. University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Michal, 1998. A sketch of the grammatical categories of Yukatek Maya with particular focus on the verbal system. MA thesis, University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, & William Pagliuca, 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen Ren, 1948. Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen Ren, 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter, & Chengchi Wang, 1996. Antecedents and blockers of long-distance reflexives: The case of Chinese ziji. Linguistic Inquiry 27:357-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard, 1986. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Oesten, & Viveka Velupillai, 2005. Tense and aspect: Introduction. World Atlas of Linguistic Structures. M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraetere, Ilse, 1995. On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity, Linguistics & Philosophy 18:1-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dol, Philomena, H., 1999. A Grammar of Maybrat: A Language of the Bird’s Head, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Leiden: Grafisch Bedrijf, Universiteit Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David, 1977. Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English imperfective progressive. Linguistics & Philosophy 1:45-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enç, Murvet, 1996. Tense and modality. In S. Lappin (ed), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 345-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, Kai, 2006. Modality and Language. D.M. Borchert (ed.), Encylopedia of Philosophy, Second Edition. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, Alessandra, & Fabio Pianesi, 1997. Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P., 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiman, John, 1980. Hua: A Papuan language of the eastern highlands of New Guinea. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew Dryer, David Gil, & Bernard Comrie (eds.), 2005. World Atlas of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, Erhard, 1986. Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics & Philosophy 9: 63-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence, 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Deborah Schiffrin (ed.). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Jianhua, Haihua Pan, and Liejiong Xu, 2001. Is there a finite-nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics 39: 1117-1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom, 2005. A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans, & Uwe Reyle, 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa, Gaetano, 1976. Subjective contours. Scientific American 234: 48-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Wolfgang, 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Wolfgang, Ping Li, & Henriette Hendriks, 2000. Aspect and assertion in Mandarin. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18: 723-770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika, 1981. The notional category of modality. In: H.J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.), New Approaches in Word Semantics. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 38-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Gregory Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, & Godehard Link 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In: The Generic Book, G. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred, 1992. The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1:1-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Stephen, 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson, 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Jo-Wang, 2003. Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12: 254-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, John, 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malotki, Ekkehard, 1983. Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language. Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangione, L. and Dingxuan Li, 1993. A compositional analysis of -guo and -le. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21: 65-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans, 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlota S., 1991/1997. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlota S., 2003. Modes of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlota S., 2006. The pragmatics and semantics of temporal meaning. Pro-ceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Conference: Issues at the Semantics -Pragmatic Interface, edited by Pascal Denis, Eric McCready, Alexis Palmer, and Brian Reese. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. pp. 92-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlota S, Ellavina Perkins, Theodore Fernald, 2003. Temporal interpreta-tion in Navajo. Proceedings of the 2nd SULA Conference. Amherst, MA: Amherst Working papers in Linguistics, pp. 175-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlota S. & Ellavina Perkins, 2005. Temporal inference of zero-marked clauses in Navajo. Proceedings of the 4th SULA Conference. Amherst, MA: Amherst Working Papers in Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlota S. & Mary S. Erbaugh, 2001. Temporal information in Mandarin. International Symposium of Chinese Grammar for the New Millenium. Shan Zhourao & Xu Liejiong (eds.). Hangzhou: Zhejiang Jiaoyu Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlota S. & Mary S. Erbaugh, 2005. Temporal interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 43: 713-756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudmuk, Cholchitha, 2001. Temporal information in Thai. Unpublished paper, University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Zeno, 1967. Verbs and Times. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetters, Carl, & Elzbieta Skibinska, 1997. Le futur: une question de temps ou de mode? Remarques g én érales et analyse du “pr ésent-futur” perfectif polonais. In: A. Borillo, C. Vetters, & M. Vuillaume (eds.), Regards sur L’aspect. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 247-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yava¸, Feryal, 1982. Future reference in Turkish. Linguistics 20: 411-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Texas at Austin, USA

    Carlota S. Smith

Authors
  1. Carlota S. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Paris 3, Sorbonne, Nouvelle, France

    Jacqueline Guéron

  2. Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle, CNRS - Université Paris 7, France

    Jacqueline Lecarme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, C.S. (2008). Time With and Without Tense. In: Guéron, J., Lecarme, J. (eds) Time and Modality. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation