Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
Time and Modality

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 75))

  • 1202 Accesses

This book is a follow-up to its companion volume, The Syntax of Time (Guéron and Lecarme, 2004), which contributed various perspectives on the syntax of tense and the temporal construal of events: models of tense interpretation, construal of verbal forms, temporal aspect versus lexical aspect, the relation between the event and its argument structure, and the interaction of case with aktionsart or tense construal. Similar in approach to the earlier book, Time and Modality explores the grammatical relations between tense and modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Carlson, G. (1995). Truth conditions and generic sentences: Two contrasting views. In Carlson, G. and Pelletier, F. J., editors, The Generic Book, pages 224-237, Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, editor, Ken Hale: A Life in Language, pages 1-52, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2005). On phases. to appear. in: Carlos Otero et al. eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comorovski, I. (2007). Constituent questions and the copula of specification. In Comorovski, I. and von Heusinger, K., editors, Existence: Semantics and Syntax, volume 84 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condoravdi, C. (2002). Temporal interpretation of modals. In Beaver, D. I., Martinez, L. D. C., Clark, B. Z., and Kaufmann, S., editors, The Construction of Meaning, pages 59-88, Palo Alto, CA. CLSI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirdache, H. and Uribe-Extebarria, M. (1997). The syntax of temporal relations: A uniform approach to tense and aspect. In Curtis, E., Lyle, J., and Webster, G., editors, Proceedings of the Sixteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, volume XIV, pages 145-159. WCCFL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu éron, J. and Lecarme, J., editors (2004). The Syntax of Time, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R. F. (1973). The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, S. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry, 31:231-270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1977). What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1:337-355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In: Eikmeyer, H.-J. and Rieser, H., editors, Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, pages 38-74, Berlin. De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In von Stechow, A. and Wunderlich, D., editors, Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pages 639-650, Berlin. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., ter Meulen, A., Link, G., and Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In Carlson, G. N. and Pelletier, F. J., editors, The Generic Book, pages 1-124, Chicago and London. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1997). Semantics, volume 1 and 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T. (1996). The phrase structure of tense. In Rooryck, J. and Zaring, L., editors, Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, pages 277-291, Dordrecht. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T. (2004). Tense and modals. In Gu éron, J. and Lecarme, J., editors, The Syntax of Time, pages 621-636, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, T. (2003). Deducing the future. In Proceedings of NELS, volume 33, pages 445-462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagona, K. (1990). Times as temporal argument structure. Talk given at the Time in Language Conference, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagona, K. (2006). On the syntactic features of epistemic and root modals. In Fernandez Soriano, O. and Eguren, L., editors, Proceedings of the 16th Colloquium on Generative Grammar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Introduction. In: Guéron, J., Lecarme, J. (eds) Time and Modality. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics