This book is a follow-up to its companion volume, The Syntax of Time (Guéron and Lecarme, 2004), which contributed various perspectives on the syntax of tense and the temporal construal of events: models of tense interpretation, construal of verbal forms, temporal aspect versus lexical aspect, the relation between the event and its argument structure, and the interaction of case with aktionsart or tense construal. Similar in approach to the earlier book, Time and Modality explores the grammatical relations between tense and modality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carlson, G. (1995). Truth conditions and generic sentences: Two contrasting views. In Carlson, G. and Pelletier, F. J., editors, The Generic Book, pages 224-237, Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, editor, Ken Hale: A Life in Language, pages 1-52, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2005). On phases. to appear. in: Carlos Otero et al. eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Comorovski, I. (2007). Constituent questions and the copula of specification. In Comorovski, I. and von Heusinger, K., editors, Existence: Semantics and Syntax, volume 84 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy.
Condoravdi, C. (2002). Temporal interpretation of modals. In Beaver, D. I., Martinez, L. D. C., Clark, B. Z., and Kaufmann, S., editors, The Construction of Meaning, pages 59-88, Palo Alto, CA. CLSI Publications.
Demirdache, H. and Uribe-Extebarria, M. (1997). The syntax of temporal relations: A uniform approach to tense and aspect. In Curtis, E., Lyle, J., and Webster, G., editors, Proceedings of the Sixteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, volume XIV, pages 145-159. WCCFL.
Gu éron, J. and Lecarme, J., editors (2004). The Syntax of Time, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
Higgins, R. F. (1973). The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Iatridou, S. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry, 31:231-270.
Kratzer, A. (1977). What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1:337-355.
Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In: Eikmeyer, H.-J. and Rieser, H., editors, Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, pages 38-74, Berlin. De Gruyter.
Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In von Stechow, A. and Wunderlich, D., editors, Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pages 639-650, Berlin. de Gruyter.
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., ter Meulen, A., Link, G., and Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In Carlson, G. N. and Pelletier, F. J., editors, The Generic Book, pages 1-124, Chicago and London. University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, D. K. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell, Oxford.
Lyons, J. (1997). Semantics, volume 1 and 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Stowell, T. (1996). The phrase structure of tense. In Rooryck, J. and Zaring, L., editors, Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, pages 277-291, Dordrecht. Kluwer.
Stowell, T. (2004). Tense and modals. In Gu éron, J. and Lecarme, J., editors, The Syntax of Time, pages 621-636, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
Werner, T. (2003). Deducing the future. In Proceedings of NELS, volume 33, pages 445-462.
Zagona, K. (1990). Times as temporal argument structure. Talk given at the Time in Language Conference, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.
Zagona, K. (2006). On the syntactic features of epistemic and root modals. In Fernandez Soriano, O. and Eguren, L., editors, Proceedings of the 16th Colloquium on Generative Grammar.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Introduction. In: Guéron, J., Lecarme, J. (eds) Time and Modality. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8353-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8354-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)