Advertisement

The Necessity of Communicating Phenomenological Insights–and its Difficulties

  • Dave R. Koukal
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 187)

The communication of insight—be it through a transcription, translation, a seminar or classroom lecture—is a philosophical task as old as Plato. Phenomenological insight, according to Husserl, is to be gained by temporarily “bracketing” the various presuppositions of the different realms of human activity for the purpose of intuiting the essential structures of experience that appear to a consciousness purified by the method of the epoché. And Husserl makes it abundantly clear that an essential part of phenomenology’s task is the communication of phenomenology’s insights to the various regions of human activity which it claims to ground through its activity. It is through such communication that phenomenology invites humanity to return to “the things themselves” that underlie all of our various preconceptions of these things, so that it may have a deeper understanding of the lived world common to all. This is often forgotten about phenomenology: it is not only about intuition, but also expression.

Keywords

Logical Investigation Phenomenological Perspective Husserlian Phenomenology Phenomenological Expression Speech Genre 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Suzanne Bachelard, A Study of Husserl’s “Formal and Transcendental Logic,” trans. Lester E. Embree (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
  2. M. M. Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981). Angela Ales Bello, editor, Analecta Husserliana, vol. 11 (Dordecht: Reidel, 1981).Google Scholar
  3. Rudolf Bernet, “Husserl’s Theory of Signs Revisited,” in: Sokolowski, Edmund Husserl and the Phenomenological Tradition.Google Scholar
  4. ——, Iso Kern and Eduard Marbach, An Introduction to Husserlian Pheno-menology (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  5. ——, “Derrida and His Master’s Voice,” in: McKenna and Evans, Derrida and Phenomenology.Google Scholar
  6. Richard Cobb-Stevens, Husserl and Analytic Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990).Google Scholar
  7. Jacques Derrida, Speech and Phenomena, and other Essays on Husserl’s The-ory of Signs, trans. David B. Allison (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
  8. ——, Edmund Husserl’s “Origin of Geometry”: An Introduction, trans. J. P. Leavey Jr. (Stony Brook, NY: Nicolas Hays, Ltd., 1978).Google Scholar
  9. R.O. Elveton, translator and editor, The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings (Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1970).Google Scholar
  10. J. Claude Evans, “Indications and Occasional Expressions,” in: McKenna and Evans, Derrida and Phenomenology.Google Scholar
  11. Fred Evans, Psychology and Nihilism: A Genealogical Critique of the Compu-tational Model of Mind (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  12. ——, “Bakhtin, Communication, and the Politics of Multiculturalism” in Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory V:3 (1998), 403-423.Google Scholar
  13. Eugen Fink, “The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism,” in: Elveton, The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings.Google Scholar
  14. ——, Sixth Cartesian Meditation: The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method, trans. Ronald Bruzina (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  15. Edmund Husserl, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. Dorion Cairns, (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1960).Google Scholar
  16. ——, The Idea of Phenomenology, trans. William P. Alston and George Nakhnikian (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964).Google Scholar
  17. ——, “Philosophy as a Rigorous Science,” in: Lauer, Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  18. ——, Formal and Transcendental Logic, trans. Dorion Cairns (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969).Google Scholar
  19. ——, Logical Investigations, volume I, trans. J. N. Findlay (London: Rout-ledge and Kegan Paul; New York: Humanities Press, 1970). ——, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. David Carr (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
  20. ——, Ideas on a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book, trans. F. Kersten (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982).Google Scholar
  21. ——, Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenologi-cal Philosophy, Second Book, trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989).Google Scholar
  22. Erazim Kohák, The Embers and the Stars (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  23. Quentin Lauer, translator and editor, Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy (New York: Harper & Row, 1965).Google Scholar
  24. W. R. McKenna and J. C. Evans, editors, Derrida and Phenomenology (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).Google Scholar
  25. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd., 1962).Google Scholar
  26. J. N. Mohanty, Edmund Husserl’s Theory of Meaning, 2nd ed. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969).Google Scholar
  27. ——, editor, Readings on Edmund Husserl’s “Logical Investigations” (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977).Google Scholar
  28. ——, “The Development of Husserl’s Thought,” in: Smith and Smith, The Cambridge Companion to Husserl.Google Scholar
  29. Renzo Raggiunti, “The Language Problem in Husserl’s Phenomenology,” in: Bello, Analecta Husserliana, vol. 11.Google Scholar
  30. Peter Simons, “Meaning and Language” in: Smith and Smith, The Cam-bridge Companion to Husserl.Google Scholar
  31. Barry Smith and David Woodruff Smith, editors, The Cambridge Compan-ion to Husserl (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  32. Robert Sokolowski, “The Structure and Content of Husserl’s Logical Investigations,” Inquiry 14 (1971), 318-350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ——, Presence and Absence: A Philosophical Investigation of Language and Being (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  34. ——, “The Logic of Parts and Wholes in Husserl’s Logical Investigations,” in: Mohanty, Readings on Edmund Husserl’s “Logical Investigations.”Google Scholar
  35. ——, editor, Edmund Husserl and the Phenomenological Tradition (Washing-ton, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  36. Donn Welton, The Origins of Meaning: A Critical Study of the Thresholds of Husserlian Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dave R. Koukal
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Detroit MercyUSA

Personalised recommendations