Skip to main content

Methods for Measuring the Population after a Disaster

Household Population Surveys in Post-Katrina New Orleans, October 2005–October 2006

  • Chapter
Applied Demography in the 21st Century

In the immediate aftermath of a disaster, estimating population size becomes a uniquely challenging and critically important decision-support function that informs disaster response and recovery.With previous demographic data in question or obsolete, estimates of the size and distribution of the affected population guide all sectors of planning, from the placement of emergency medical and public safety assets to the allocation of temporary housing and reconstruction dollars. In confronting the effects of a significant natural or man-made disaster, planners require flexible demographic tools with which to address the need for fast, accurate, and low resource data collection.

In the weeks and months after Hurricane Katrina, planners from the City of New Orleans (CNO) Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed and implemented a series of rapid household surveys to estimate the size and distribution of New Orleans’ returning population. Several months after the last CNO-EOC household survey, the state requested federal assistance to conduct household surveys across 18 parishes, including Orleans Parish, in the 2006 Louisiana Health and Population Survey (LHPS). The methods used in conducting these surveys provided a rapid, reliable, and low resource means for planners to produce demographic estimates in the aftermath of Katrina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • City of New Orleans Emergency Operations Center (2005). Rapid Population Estimate Survey: December 3-4, 2005, Survey. New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabe, T., G. Falk, M. McCarthy, and V.W. Mason (2005). Hurricane Katrina: Social-Demographic Characteristics of Impacted Areas. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Services. November 4, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.H. (1953). Sample Survey Methods and Theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofler, M., H. Pfister, R. Lieb, and H.U. Wittchen (2005). The Use of Weights to Account for Non-Response and Drop-Out. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology 40(4):291-299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Public Health Institute (2007). Survey Report: Orleans Parish. New Orleans, LA, January 17, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, J. and N. Burris (2005). Health Services Support Plan. New Orleans, LA: City of New Orleans Emergency Operations Center. October 21, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malilay, J., W.D. Flanders, and D.A. Brogan (1996). A Modified Cluster-Sampling Method for Post-Disaster Rapid Assessment of Needs. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 74 (4):399-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noji, E.K. (2005). Estimating Population Size in Emergencies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83(3):164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.K. (1986). A Review and Evaluation of the Housing Unit Method of Population Estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(394):287-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.K. (1996). Demography of Disaster: Population Estimates after Hurricane Andrew. Population Research and Policy Review 15(5-6):459-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.K. and S. Cody (2004). An Evaluation of Population Estimates in Florida: April 1, 2000. Population Research and Policy Review 23:1-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G., T. Grant, and N. Weaver (2006). Rapid Population Estimate Project: January 28-29, 2006 Survey Report. New Orleans, LA: City of New Orleans Emergency Operations Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2000). 2000 Census Summary File (SF3). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2002). Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2005). American Community Survey. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2006). Special Population Estimates for Impacted Counties in the Gulf Coast Area. Washington, DC, gulfcoast_impact_estimates.xls, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2007). County Population Datasets. Washington, DC. CO-EST-ALLDATA.csv, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research (2006). Current Housing Unit Damage Estimates: Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma. February 12, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWLTV (2005). New Orleans Mayor Suspends Reopening. Accessed 2006 at http://www.wwltv.com/sharedcontent/nationworld/katrina/stories/ 091905ccKatrinajcwcMainstory.a8ce49f5.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stone, G. (2008). Methods for Measuring the Population after a Disaster. In: Murdock, S.H., Swanson, D.A. (eds) Applied Demography in the 21st Century. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8329-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics