Advertisement

Human-Altered Tree-Based Habitats and Their Value in Conserving Bird and Bat Diversity in Northeast Luzon, The Philippines

  • M. Van Weerd
  • D. J. Snelder
Part of the Advances in Agroforestry book series (ADAG, volume 5)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the conservation value of smallholder tree-based systems for bird and bat species in the human-altered landscape of the Cagayan Valley, Northeast Luzon. Birds and bats in village homegardens, small Gmelina arborea plantations and uncultivated shrub-land were surveyed in 11 localities, using 118 point counts for birds and 34 mist-net-lines for bats. A total of 1,093 individual birds were observed representing 58 resident bird species, including 11 species endemic to the Philippines, 15 forest bird species and one globally threatened species. A total of 409 bats were captured belonging to 16 species, including five endemics, five forest bat species and also one globally threatened species. Gmelina forest plantations held slightly more forest bird species than homegardens and surrounding shrub-land. However, the human-altered landscape fails to serve as an alternative for closed-canopy forest habitat containing only 13 percent of lowland forest birds, 15 percent of endemic lowland birds and eight percent of threatened lowland birds known to occur in the region. For bats, human-altered habitats offer slightly better conditions, containing 44 percent of all lowland bats, 42 percent of endemic bats and 29 percent of forest bats in the region. Most forest birds and bats were restricted to a narrow zone bordering contiguous forest. Reforestation through mono-culture Gmelina arborea plantations is of little direct value to bird and bat conservation but it could act as a catalyst for forest recovery. Better structured, diverse and interconnected homegardens and forest plantations potentially have higher conservation values for birds and bats.

Keywords

Biodiversity conservation ecosystem services endemic species exotic tree plantation homegardens off-park conservation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashton PS (2003) Floristic zonation of tree communities on wet tropical mountains revisited. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6 (1/2): 87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atta-Krah K, Kindt R, Skilton JN and Amaral W (2004) Managing biological and genetic diversity in tropical agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 61 (1): 183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balete DS, Heaney LR and Crombie RI (1995) First records of Hipposideros legakuli from the Philippines. Asia Life Sciences 4: 89–94Google Scholar
  4. Bernard E and Fenton MB (2007) Bats in a fragmented landscape: species composition, diversity and habitat interactions in savannas of Santerem, Central Amazonia, Brazil. Biological Conservation 134: 332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boulinier T, Nichols JD, Sauer JR, Hines JE and Pollock KH (1998) Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79: 1018–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks TM, Pimm SL and Oyugi JO (1999) Time lag between deforestation and bird extinction in tropical forest fragments. Conservation Biology 13 (5): 1140–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Konstant WR, Flick P, Pilgrim J, Oldfield S, Magin G and Hilton-Taylor C (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 16 (4): 909–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE and da Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291: 125–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Center for New Crops & Plant Protection (2007) Crop index: Gmelina arborea Roxb. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/Gmelina_arborea.html. Cited 12 February 2007
  10. Collar NJ, Mallari NAD and Tabaranza BR Jr (1999) Threatened birds of the Philippines. The Haribon Foundation/Birdlife international red data book. Bookmark, Makati City, The Philippines, pp559Google Scholar
  11. Colwell RK (2005) EstimateS v. 7.5. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates
  12. Danielsen F, Balete DS, Christensen TD, Heegaard M, Jacobsen OF, Jensen A, Lund T and Poulsen MK (1993) Conservation of biological diversity in the Sierra Madre Mountains of Isabela and southern Cagayan Province, the Philippines. DENR-Birdlife International, Manila/DOF, Copenhagen, pp146Google Scholar
  13. Diaz-Frances E and Soberon J (2005) Statistical estimation and model selection of species-accumulation functions. Conservation Biology 19(2): 569–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dickinson EC, Kennedy RS and Parkes KC (1991) The birds of the Philippines: an annotated checklist. British ornithologists’ union checklist No 12. Dorset Press, Dorset, UK, pp507Google Scholar
  15. Duran SM and Kattan GH (2005) A test of the utility of exotic tree plantations for understory birds and food resources in the Colombian Andes. Biotropica 37 (1): 129–135Google Scholar
  16. Estrada A and Coates-Estrada R (2002) Bats in continuous forest, forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat-island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biological Conservation 103: 237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2007) State of the world’s forests 2007. http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/a0773e/a0773e00.html. Cited 11 April 2007
  18. Forestry Management Bureau (2004) Forest cover of the Philippines per region 2003. http://forestry.denr.gov.ph/stat2004.html. Cited 11 April 2007
  19. Francis CM (1989) A comparison of mist nets and two designs of harp traps for capturing bats. Journal of Mammalogy 70 (4): 865–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agroforestry Systems 61 (1): 5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gotelli NJ and Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4 (4): 379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanski I (1999) Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity and meta-populations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87: 209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison S, Emtage NF and Nasayao EE (2004) Past and present forestry support programs in the Philippines, and lessons for the future. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 3 (3): 303–317Google Scholar
  24. Heaney LR (1986) Biogeography of mammals in SE Asia: estimates of rates of colonization, extinction and speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28: 127–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heaney LR and Regalado JC (1998) Vanishing treasures of the Philippine rain forest. The Field Museum, Chicago, IL, pp88Google Scholar
  26. Heaney LR, Balete DS, Dolar ML, Alcala AC, Dans ATL, Gonzales PC, Ingle NR, Lepiten MV, Oliver WLR, Ong PS, Rickart EA, Tabaranza BR Jr and Utzurrum RCB (1998) A synopsis of the mammalian fauna of the Philippine islands. Fieldiana Zoology New Series 88. The Field Museum, Chicago, IL, pp61Google Scholar
  27. Hortal J, Borges PAV and Gaspar C (2006) Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 274–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hughes JB, Daily GC and Ehrlich PR (2002) Conservation of tropical forest birds in countryside habitats. Ecology Letters 5: 121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54 (2): 187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ingle NR and Heaney LR (1992) A key to the bats of the Philippine Islands. Fieldiana Zoology New Series 69. The Field Museum, Chicago, IL, pp44Google Scholar
  31. IUCN (The World Conservation Union) (2006) 2006 IUCN red list of threatened species. www.iucn.org. Downloaded on 19 February 2007
  32. IUCN and Conservation International and NatureServe (2006) Global amphibian assessment. www.globalamphibians.org. Downloaded on 19 December 2006
  33. Kennedy RS, Gonzales PC, Dickinson EC, Miranda HC Jr and Fisher TH (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp369Google Scholar
  34. Kummer DW (1992) Deforestation in the postwar Philippines. Ateneo de Manila University Press, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  35. Lasco RD and Pulhin JM (2000) Forest land use in the Philippines and climate change mitigation. Mitigation and Adoption Strategies for Global Change 5: 81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lasco RD, Visco RG and Pulhin JM (2001) Secondary forests in the Philippines: formation and transformation in the 20th century. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 13 (4): 652–670Google Scholar
  37. Law BS, Anderson J and Chidel M (1999) Bat communities in a fragmented forest landscape on the south-west slopes of New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation 88: 333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marsden SJ, Symes CT and Mack AL (2006) The response of a New Guinean avifauna to conversion of forest to small-scale agriculture. Ibis 148: 629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Masipiqueña AB, Persoon G and Snelder DJ (2000) In: Allen R, Harkes P and Bicker A (eds) Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations, the use of fire in northeastern Luzon (Philippines): conflicting views of local people, scientists and government officials. Harwood Academic Publishers, Canterbury, UK, pp177–212Google Scholar
  40. McNeely JA (2004) Nature vs. nurture: managing relationships between forests, agroforestry and wild biodiversity. Agroforestry systems 61 (1): 155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McNeely JA and Schroth G (2006) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation–traditional practices, present dynamics, and lessons for the future. Biodiversity and Conservation 15 (2): 549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mudar KM and Allen MS (1986) A list of bats from northeastern Luzon, Philippines. Mammalia 50 (2): 219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB and Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. NAMRIA (National Mapping and Resource Information Authority) (1995) Topographic maps 1:250, 000 sheets 2506 and 2508. NAMRIA, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  45. NORDECO and DENR (1998) Integrating conservation and development in protected area management in the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, the Philippines. Nordic Agency for Development and Ecology (NORDECO)/Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Copenhagen/Manila, pp207Google Scholar
  46. NSO (National Statistics Office) (2000) 2000 census of population and housing. http://www.census.gov.ph/census2000/
  47. O’Riordan T and Stoll-Kleeman S (2002) Biodiversity, sustainability and human communities: protecting beyond the protected. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. PAGASA (2005) Monthly minimum, maximum and rainfall data from weather stations Tuguegarao and Casiguran 1975–2004. Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA), ManilaGoogle Scholar
  49. Pasicolan PN, Udo De Haes HA and Sajise PE (1997) Farm forestry: an alternative to government-driven reforestation in the Philippines. Forest Ecology and Management 99 (1–2): 261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peh KSH, de Jong J, Sodhi NS, Lim SLH and Yap CAM (2005) Lowland rainforest avifauna and human disturbance: persistence of primary forest birds in selectively logged forest and mixed-rural habitats of southern Peninsular Malaysia. Biological Conservation 123: 489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peh KSH, Sodhi NS, de Jong J, Sekercioglu CH, Yap CAM and Lim SLH (2006) Conservation value of degraded habitats for forest birds in southern Peninsular Malaysia. Diversity and Distributions 12: 572–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Petit LJ and Petit DR (2003) Evaluating the importance of human-modified lands for neotropical bird conservation. Conservation Biology 17 (3): 687–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Posa MRC and Sodhi NS (2006) Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biological Conservation 129: 256–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poulsen MK (1995) The threatened and near-threatened birds of Luzon, Philippines, and the role of the Sierra Madre mountains in their conservation. Bird Conservation International 5: 79–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132 (5): 652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. The American Naturalist 158 (1): 87–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Round PD, Gale GA and Brockelman WY (2006) A comparison of bird communities in mixed fruit orchards and natural forest at Khao Luang, southern Thailand. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 2873–2891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sekercioglu CH, Scott LR, Brenes FO, Ehrlich PR and Daily GC (2007) Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conservation Biology 21 (2): 482–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shankar Raman TR (2003) Assessment of census techniques for interspecific comparisons of tropical rainforest bird densities: a field evaluation in the Western Ghats, India. Ibis 145: 9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Prawiradilaga DM, Darjono, Tinulele I, Dwi Putra D and Han Tong Tan T (2005) Land use and conservation value for forest birds in central Sulawesi (Indonesia). Biological Conservation 122: 547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stier SC and Siebert SF (2002) The Kyoto protocol: an opportunity for biodiversity restoration forestry. Conservation Biology 16 (3): 575–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thiollay JM (1995) The role of traditional agroforests in the conservation of rain forest bird diversity in Sumatra. Conservation Biology 9: 335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van der Lans F (2005) Caves in crisis. Managing bat guano usage in NE Luzon, Philippines. Environment and Development Student Report No 187. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Weerd M and Van der Ploeg J (2004) Surveys of wetlands and waterbirds in Cagayan Valley, Luzon, Philippines. Forktail 20: 33–39Google Scholar
  65. Walter BA and Moore JL (2005) The definition of bias, precision, and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28: 815–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waltert M, Mardiastuti A and Muhlenberg M (2004) Effects of land use on bird species richness in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conservation Biology 18 (5): 1339–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. WCSP (Wildlife Conservation Society of the Philippines) (1997) Philippine red data book. Bookmark, Makati City, The Philippines, pp262Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental SciencesLeiden UniversityRA LeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations