Urban Environment

  • Chris R. de Freitas
  • Martin Perry
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter raises questions about the impact of urbanisation on the state of the environment. The concentration of the population in urban centres and especially the Auckland region is generally seen to benefit economic development. This perception explains a lack of policy interest in redistributing population away from where it continues to concentrate. Little is known about how the incidence of and capacity to manage environmental issues might be affected by the distribution of population. In the past it has been argued that urban authorities have not had the legislative power to address environmental sustainability. The Local Government Act 2002 and possible reforms of the Resource Management Act provide more scope for councils to consider environment issues in their long term planning. The environmental values of New Zealanders continue to indicate that addressing economic well being is considered more important than improving the state of the environment. The population density of New Zealand cities is low compared with cities in Europe. There are potential environmental costs and benefits from increasing urban density.

Key Concepts and Terms

Green buildings Long Term Council Community Plans Population distribution Productivity Quality of Life Recycling Social capital Spatial planning Urban consolidation Urban density Waste Zero Waste 

References

  1. Auckland City Council, et al. (1999). Quality of life in New Zealand’s six largest cities. Auckland: Auckland City Council.Google Scholar
  2. Auckland City Council. (2011a). Background paper – Auckland economic development strategy. Auckland: Auckland Council.Google Scholar
  3. Auckland City Council. (2011b). Auckland economic development strategy. Auckland: Auckland Council.Google Scholar
  4. Auckland City Council. (2011c). Auckland Council waste assessment overview. Auckland: Auckland Council.Google Scholar
  5. Nielsen, A. C. (2011). Quality of life survey 2010 eight cities report. Auckland: ACNielsen.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, C., & Legg, S. (2009, November 12–13). Ergonomics as a tool for business sustainability. Paper presented at The Sustainability Debate – The Way Forward Conference, Massey University, Albany.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, C., & Legg, S. (2011). Human factors and ergonomics for business sustainability. In G. Eweje & M. Perry (Eds.), Business and sustainability: Concepts, strategies and changes. Bradford: Emerald.Google Scholar
  8. Bührs, T., & Bartlett, R. (1993). Environment policy in New Zealand: The politics of clean & green. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Christchurch City Council. (2011). New Zealand’s greenest building. Retrieved 24 October 2011, from http://www.ccc.govt.nz/cityleisure/projectstoimprovechristchurch/newcivicbuilding/greenestbuilding.aspx
  10. Cryer, B., Felder, J., Matthews, R., Pettigrew, M., & Okrent, B. (2006). Evaluating the diffusion of green building practices. Los Angeles: UCLA Anderson School of Management.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Internal Affairs. (2006). Observations and trends from 2004/14 long-term council community plans. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  12. European Environment Agency. (2007). Europe’s environment: The fourth assessment. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  13. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Fothergill, S. (2005). A new regional policy for Britain. Regional Studies, 39(5), 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gabe, J. (2010, May 26–28). Creating an efficient market for green buildings: What can we learn from the first 450 users of the LEED assessment tool? Proceedings of New Zealand Sustainable Building Conference 2010 (SB10), Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  16. Glaeser, E. (2000). The new economics of urban and regional growth. In G. Clark, M. Feldman, & M. Gertler (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Glaeser, E., & Maré, D. (2001). Cities and skills. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 316–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosh, S., & Head, L. (2009). Retrofitting the suburban garden: Morphologies and some elements of sustainability potential of two Australian residential suburbs compared. Australian Geographer, 40(3), 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gold, H., & Webster, A. (1990). New Zealand values today. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  20. Grimes, A. (2007). Impacts of land supply and planning infrastructure on New Zealand house prices. Wellington: Motu Economics & Public Policy Research Trust.Google Scholar
  21. Haughton, G., & Hunter, C. (1994). Sustainable cities. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  22. Holdsworth, L. (2007). Report of expert reviewers on changes between the 2004–14 and 2006–16 long term council community plans. Wellington: Controller and Auditor-General.Google Scholar
  23. Hughey, K., Cullen, R., Kerr, G., & Cook, A. (2004). Application of the pressure-state-response framework to perceptions reporting of the state of the New Zealand environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 70(1), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkin, S., & Pedersen, Z. (2009). Rethinking our built environments: Towards a sustainable future. A research document. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.Google Scholar
  25. Knudsen, B., Florida, R., Stolarick, K., & Gates, G. (2008). Density and creativity in U.S. regions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(2), 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maré, D. (2008). Labour productivity in Auckland firms (Working paper 2008–12). Wellington: Motu Economics & Public Policy Research Trust.Google Scholar
  27. McDermott Associates. (1983). Regional implications of closer economic relations with Australia: A preliminary report. Study prepared for the Town and Country Planning Division. Wellington: Ministry of Works and Development.Google Scholar
  28. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2006). Remaking the way we make things: Creating a new definition of quality with cradle-to-cradle design. In D. Marinova, D. Annandale, & J. Phillimore (Eds.), The international handbook on environmental technology management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Morrison, P. (2011). Local expressions of subjective well-being: The New Zealand experience. Regional Studies, 45(8), 1039–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ministry for the Environment. (1994). Environment 2010 strategy: A statement of the government’s on the environment. Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  31. Ministry for the Environment. (1997). The state of New Zealand’s environment. Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  32. Ministry for the Environment (MfE). (2006a). Gentle Footprints: Boots ‘n’ All. Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  33. Ministry for the Environment. (2006b). Targets in the New Zealand waste strategy: 2006 Review of Progress. Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  34. Ministry for the Environment. (2009). Household consumption expenditure. Environmental report card April 2009. Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry for the Environment (MfE). (2010a). Building competitive cities: reform of the urban and infrastructure planning system (Technical Working Paper) Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  36. Ministry for the Environment. (2010b.) Building competitive cities: reform of the urban and infrastructure planning system (Discussion Document). Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  37. Ministry for the Environment. (2010c). The New Zealand waste strategy: Reducing harm, improving efficiency. Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  38. Ministry for the Environment and Local Government New Zealand. (2002). New Zealand waste strategy. Towards zero waste and a sustainable New Zealand. Wellington: MfE.Google Scholar
  39. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2009). Contributions of the land-based primary industries to New Zealand’s economic growth. Wellington: MAF.Google Scholar
  40. Ministry of Economic Development. (2011). Treasury and Statistics New Zealand, Economic development indicators 2011. Wellington: Ministry of Economic Development.Google Scholar
  41. Ministry of Transport. (2004). The New Zealand vehicle emissions screening programme. Resource document. Wellington, New Zealand, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Ministry for Transport. (2005). Annual report. Wellington: Ministry for Transport.Google Scholar
  43. New Zealand Treasury. (2001). Geography and the inclusive Economy: A regional perspective (Treasury Working Paper 01/17). Wellington: New Zealand Treasury.Google Scholar
  44. Newell, J. (2002). New Zealand regional trends in agriculture and rural communities 1986–1996. Wellington: Unpublished report to the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
  45. Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1989). Cities and automobile dependence. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  46. Nickerson, R., & Moray, N. (1995). Environmental change. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Emerging needs and opportunities for human factors research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  47. Oldfield, P., Trabucco, D., & Wood, A. (2009). Five energy generations of tall buildings: An historical analysis of energy consumption in high-rise buildings. The Journal of Architecture, 14(5), 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2007). OECD Environmental performance reviews New Zealand. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  49. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. (2002). Creating our future: Sustainable development in New Zealand. Wellington: PCE.Google Scholar
  50. Perry, M. (2002). Job transfers and regional labour migrants in New Zealand. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 8(2), 165–182.Google Scholar
  51. Perry, M. (2010). Controversies in local economic development. Abington, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Perry, M. (2011). Finding space for the creative class: A review of the issues. Urban Policy and Research, 29(4), 325–341.Google Scholar
  53. Perry, M., & Hayward, D. (2003). Contribution of demographic structure to regional migration, 1991–2001. New Zealand Population Review, 29(2), 141–151.Google Scholar
  54. Pratt, M., & Lowndes, T. (2005). Regional economic development and sustainability. In J. Rowe (Ed.), Economic development: The New Zealand experience. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  55. Rose, E., Huakau, J., & Cresswell, S. (2005). Economic values: A report from the New Zealand values study, 2005. Palmerston North: Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Massey University.Google Scholar
  56. Roseth, J. (1991). Urban consolidation – How decisions are made. Urban Futures Special Issue, 1(July), 1–7.Google Scholar
  57. Searle, G. (1991). Successes and failures of urban consolidation in Sydney. Urban Futures Special Issue, 1(July), 23–30.Google Scholar
  58. Simpson, S. (1990). The Times guide to the environment. London: Times Book.Google Scholar
  59. Statistics New Zealand. (2010). National family and household projections: 2006 (base) – 2031 update. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
  60. Sundakov, A. (2005). Greenhouse gas emissions policies – Is there a way forward? Wellington: Greenhouse Policy Coalition.Google Scholar
  61. Szabo, M. (1993). New Zealand’s poisoned paradise. New Scientist.Google Scholar
  62. Taylor, P. (2005). Local Government Act 2002: Creating the potential for a new constitutional relationship between local and central government. Butterworths Resource Management Bulletin, 6, 4–8.Google Scholar
  63. Tett, G. (2009). Fool’s gold. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Troy, P. (1992). The new feudalism. Urban Futures, 2(2), 36–44.Google Scholar
  65. Unwin, N., & Searle, G. (1991). Ecologically sustainable development and urban development. Urban Futures Special Issue, 4(November), 1–12.Google Scholar
  66. Zero Waste New Zealand Trust. (2005). Zero waste update, September Issue 48. Auckland: Zero Waste New Zealand Trust.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris R. de Freitas
    • 1
  • Martin Perry
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EnvironmentUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of ManagementMassey University (Wellington)WellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations