Advertisement

Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Characterization of Plant Litter Quality: Towards a Simpler Way of Predicting Carbon Turnover in Peatlands?

  • Petra Vávrová
  • Bo Stenberg
  • Marjut Karsisto
  • Veikko Kitunen
  • Tarja Tapanila
  • Raija Laiho

The ability of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) for the rapid determination of several chemical properties of plant litters was investigated. The chemical properties included fractions that potentially affect decomposition dynamics in peatlands: total carbon, total nitrogen, extractable (soluble) substances, holocellulose (sum of cellulose and hemicelluloses), sulfuric acid (H2SO4) insoluble lignin (Klason lignin), copper oxide (CuO) oxidation products of lignin: vanillin (V1), vanillic acid (V2), acetovanillone (V3), 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (P1), 4-hydroxyacetophenone (P2), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (P3), and ferulic acid (C2), as well as carbon (C) to nitrogen (N), and N to lignin ratios. To maximize variability, the samples included litters of nine plant species, representing five groups of plant litter: graminoid, deciduous foliage, conifer foliage, wood, and moss. For each quality parameter we compared (1) the model calibrated for all the various litter types (combined dataset) and (2) the model calibrated only for pine branch litter (branch dataset). Relationships were found between the chemical properties and near infrared (NIR) spectra using partial least squares (PLS) regression. Using both the combined and the branch datasets, very good NIR calibrations were possible for total C and N, ash content, nonpolar (dichlormethane) extractives (NPE), ethanol extractives (EE), and total extractives (TE) (sum of all soluble substances), holocellulose, C:N, and N:lignin ratios based on r 2 that varied from 0.80 to 0.99. Using only the combined dataset very good calibrations were also possible for acetone extractives (AE), water extractives (WE), lignin, P2, P3, C2, V1, V2, and V3, with r 2 from 0.81 to 0.97. The models combining all the different litter types performed better than the models constructed for the pine branch litter only, based on r 2 and residual prediction deviation (RPD), the ratio of the Y-variable standard deviation to the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP). However, RMSEP was generally smaller when a branch litter property was predicted by the branch model compared to the prediction using the combined model, indicating the potential of improving the NIR calibrations by constructing specific models for different groups of litter. NIRS proved to be an accurate and fast method for the determination of plant litter quality that might be highly relevant for decomposition and C dynamics in peatlands.

Keywords

Decomposition litter quality NIRS peatlands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber, J.D., & Melillo, J.M. (1980). Litter decomposition: Measuring relative contribution of organic matter and nitrogen to forest soils. Canadian Journal of Botany, 58, 416–421.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, R.J., Dhanoa, M.S., & Lister, S.J. (1989). Standard normal variate transformation and detrending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Applied Spectroscopy, 43, 772–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beining, B., Holden, N.M., Ward, S.M., & Farrell, E.P. (2001). The distribution and prediction of gross heat value in Irish industrial peat. International Peat Journal, 10, 49–55.Google Scholar
  4. Berendse, F., Berg, B., & Bosatta, E. (1987). The effect of lignin and nitrogen on the decomposition of litter in nutrient-poor ecosystems: A theoretical approach. Canadian Journal of Botany, 65, 1116–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, B., & Ekbohm, G. (1991). Litter mass-loss rates and decomposition patterns in some needle and leaf litter types. Long-term decomposition in a Scots pine forest. VII. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69, 1449–1456.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, B., & Matzner, E. (1997). The effect of N deposition on the mineralization of C from plant litter and humus. Environmental Reviews, 5, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg, B., & Staaf, H. (1980). Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. II. Ecological Bulletin, 32, 373–390.Google Scholar
  8. Blair, J.M. (1988). Nitrogen, sulfur and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing deciduous leaf litter in the southern Appalachians. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 20, 693–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolster, K.L., Martin, M.E., & Aber, J.D. (1996). Determination of carbon fraction and nitrogen concentration in tree foliage by near infrared reflectance: A comparison of statistical methods. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26, 590–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouchard, V., Gillon, D., Joffre, R., & Lefeuvre, J.C. (2003). Actual litter decomposition rates in salt marshes measured using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 290, 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brinkmann, K., Blaschke, L., & Polle, A. (2002). Comparison of different methods for lignin determination as a basis for calibration of Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and implications of lignoproteins. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28, 2483–2501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruun, S., Stenberg, B., Breland, T.A., Gudmundsson, J., Henriksen, T.M., Jensen, L.S., Korsæth, A., Luxhøi, J., Pálmason, F., Pedersen, A., & Salo, T. (2005). Empirical predictions of plant material C and N mineralization patterns from near infrared spectroscopy, stepwise chemical digestion and C/N ratios. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 2283–2296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Card, D.H., Peterson, D.J., Matson, P.A., & Aber, J.D. (1988). Prediction of leaf chemistry by the use of visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 26, 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang, C.W., & Laird, D.A. (2002). Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopic analysis of soil C and N. Soil Science, 167, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang, C.W., Laird, D.A., Mausbach, M.J., & Hurburgh, C.R. (2001). Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy-principal components regression analyses of soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 480–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chodak, M., Ludvik, B., Khanna, P., & Beese, F. (2002). Use of near infrared spectroscopy to determine biological and chemical characteristics of organic layers under spruce and beech stands. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Confalonieri, M., Fornaiser, F., Ursino, A., Boccardi, F., Pintus, B., & Odoardi, M. (2001). The potential of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a tool for the chemical characterization of agricultural soils. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 9, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coûteaux, M.M., Rovira, P., & Berg, B. (2003). Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for determination of organic matter fractions including microbial biomass in coniferous forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 1587–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cozzolino, D., Fassio, A., & Giminez, A. (2000). The use of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to predict the composition of whole maize plants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81, 142–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cozzolino, D., & Moron, N. (2003). The potential of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to analyse soil chemical and physical characteristics. Journal of Agricultural Science, 140, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Curran, P.J. (1989). Remote sensing of foliar chemistry. Remote sensing of Environment, 30, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalal, R.C., & Henry, R.J. (1986). Simultaneous determination of moisture, organic carbon, and total nitrogen by near infrared reflectance spectrophotometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50, 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duncan, P., Clanton, D., & Clark, D. (1987). Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for quality analysis of sandhills meadow forage. Journal of Animal Science, 64, 1743–1750.Google Scholar
  24. Edmonds, R.L. (1987). Decomposition rates and nutrient dynamics in small-diameter woody litter in four forest ecosystems in Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esbensen, K.H. (2002). Multivariate data analysis: In practice. Oslo: CAMO Process AS.Google Scholar
  26. FORCE Technology (2007). Biolex – a database of solid biomass fuels. Retrieved April 14, 2007 from http://biolex.dk-teknik.dk.
  27. Garnsworthy, P.C., Wiseman, J., & Fegeros, K. (2000). Prediction of chemical, nutritive and agronomic characteristics of wheat by near infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural Science, 135, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gillon, D., Jofre, R., & Dardenne, P. (1993). Predicting the stage of decay of decomposing leaves by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 2552–2559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gillon, D., Houssard, C., & Jofre, R. (1999a). Using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content in heterogenus plant material. Oecologia, 118, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gillon, D., Joffre, R., & Ibrahima, A. (1999b). Can litter decomposability be predicted by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy? Ecology, 80, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gillon, D., Dauriac, F., Deshayes, M., Valette, J.C. and Moro, C. (2004). Estimation of foliage moisture content using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 124, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gorham, E. (1991). Northern peatlands: Role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecological Applications, 1, 182–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grossmann, Y.L., Ustin, S.L., Jacquemoud, S., Sanderson, E.W., Schmuck, G., & Verdebout, J. (1996). Critique of stepwise multiple linear regression for the extraction of leaf biochemistry information from leaf reflectance data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 56, 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hedges, J.I., & Ertel, J.R. (1982). Characterization of lignin by capillary chromatography of cupric oxide oxidation products. Analytical Chemistry, 54, 174–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jofre, R., Gillon, D., Dardenne, P., Agneessens, R., & Biston, R. (1992). The use of near-infrared spectroscopy in litter decomposition studies. Annales des Sciences Forestières, 49, 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karsisto, M., Savitski, M., Kitunen, V., Penttilä, T., Laine, J., & Laiho, R. (2003). Quantification of organic fractions in litter and peat organic matter. In J.O. Honkanen & P.S. Koponen (Eds.), Current perspectives in environmental science and technology (pp. 135–137). Joensuu, Finland: Finnish Society for Environmental Sciences.Google Scholar
  37. Kelley, S.S., Rowell, R.M., Davis, M., Jurich, C.K., Ibach, R. (2004). Rapid analysis of the chemical composition of agricultural fibers using near infrared spectroscopy and pyrolysis molecular beam mass spectrometry. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lacaze, B., & Joffre, R. (1994). Extracting biochemical information from visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy of fresh and dried leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144, 277–281.Google Scholar
  39. Laiho, R. (2006). Decomposition in peatlands: Reconciling seemingly contrasting results on the impacts of lowered water levels. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38, 2011–2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ludwig, B., Khanna, P.K., Bauhus, J., & Hopmans, P. (2002). Near infrared spectroscopy of forest soils to determine chemical and biological properties related to soil sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management, 171, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martens, H., Naes, T. (1991). Multivariate Calibration. (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
  42. Martin, M.E., & Aber, J.D. (1994). Analysis of forest foliage. III: Determining nitrogen, lignin and cellulose in fresh leaves using near infrared reflectance data. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, P.D., Malley, D.F., Manning, G., & Fuller, L. (2002). Determination of soil organic carbon and nitrogen at the field level using near infrared spectroscopy. Canadian Journal of Soil Scence, 82, 413–422.Google Scholar
  44. McCarty, G.W., Reeves III, J.B., Reeves, V.B., Follet, R.F., Kimble, J.M. (2002). Mid-infrared and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for soil carbon measurement. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 640–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McLellan, T.M., Aber, J.D., & Martin, M.E. (1991a). Determination of nitrogen, lignin and cellulose content of decomposing leaf material by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 1684–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McLellan, T.M., Martin, M.E., Aber, J.D., Melillo, J.M., Nadelhoffer, K.J., & Dewey, B. (1991b). Comparison of wet chemistry and near infrared reflectance measurements of carbon-fraction chemistry and nitrogen concentration of forest foliage. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 1689–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meentemeyer, V. (1978). Macroclimate and lignin control of liter decomposition rates. Ecology, 59, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murphy, K.L., Klopatek, J.M., & Klopatek, C.C. (1998). The effects of litter quality and climate on decomposition along an elevational gradient. Ecological Applications, 8, 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norris, K.H., Barnes, R.F., Moore, J.E., & Shenk, J.S. (1976). Predicting forage quality by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Animal Science, 43, 889–897.Google Scholar
  50. Ono, K., Hiraide, M., & Amari, M. (2003). Determination of lignin, holocellulose, and organic solvent extractives in fresh leaf, litterfall, and organic material on forest floor using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Forest Research, 8, 1341–6979.Google Scholar
  51. Päivänen, J., & Vasander, H. (1994). Carbon balance in mire ecosystems. World Resource Review, 6, 102–111.Google Scholar
  52. Quaramby, C., & Allen, S.E. (1989). Organic constituents. In S.E. Allen (Ed.), Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials (pp. 160–200). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Ryan, M.G., Melillo, J.M., & Ricca, A. (1990). A comparison of methods for determining proximate carbon fractions of forest litter. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Savitzky, A., & Golay, M.J.E. (1964). Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry, 36, 1627–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schimleck, L.R., & Yazaki, Y. (2003) Analysis of Pinus radiata D. Don Bark by Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Holzforschung, 57, 520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shenk, J.S. (1992). NIRS analysis of natural agricultural products. In K.I. Hildrum, T. Isaaksson, T. Naes, & A. Tandberg (Eds.), Near infra-red spectroscopy. Bridging the gap between data analysis and NIR applications (pp. 235–240). London: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
  57. Shenk, J.S., & Westerhaus, M.O. (1991). Population definition, sample selection, and calibration procedure for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Science, 31, 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shepherd, K.D., Vanlauwe, B., Gachengo, C.N., Palm, C.A. (2005). Decomposition and mineralization of organic residues predicted using near infrared spectroscopy. Plant and Soil, 277, 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stenberg, B., Jensen, L.S., Nordkvist, E., Breland, T.A., Pedersen, A., Gudmundsson, J., Bruun, S., Salo, T., Palmason, F., Henriksen, T.M. & Korsaeth, A. (2004). Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for quantification of crop residue, green manure and catch crop C and N fractions governing decomposition dynamics in soil. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 12, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stohlgren, T.J. (1988). Litter dynamics in two Sierran mixed conifer forests, II: Nutrient release in decomposing leaf litter. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 1136–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, B., Parkinson, D., & Parsons, W.J.F. (1989). Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test. Ecology, 70, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor, B.R., Prescott, C.E., Parsons, W.J.F., &Parkinson, D. (1991). Substrate control of litter decomposition in four Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Canadian Journal of Boany, 69, 2242–2250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tian, G., Kang, B.T., & Brussard, L. (1992). Biological effects of plant residues with contrasting chemical compositions under humid tropical conditions – decomposition and nutrient release. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24, 1051–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Terhoeven-Urselmans, T., Michel, K., Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., & Ludwig, B. (2006). Near-infrared spectroscopy can predict the composition of organic matter in soil and litter. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 169, 168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watson, C.A., Etchevers, G. & Shuey, W.C. (1976). Relationship between ash and protein contents of flour mill streams determined with the InfraAnalyzer and standard approved methods. Cereal Chemistry, 53, 803–804.Google Scholar
  66. Wessman, C.A., Aber, J.D., Peterson, D.L., & Melillo, J.M. (1988). Foliar analysis using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams, P., & Sobering, D.C. (1996). How do we do it: A brief summary of the methods we use in developing near infrared calibrations. In A.M.C. Davies & P. Williams (Eds.), Near infrared spectroscopy: The future waves (pp. 185–188). Chichester, UK: NIR Publications.Google Scholar
  68. Winch, J.E., & Major, H. (1981). Predicting nitrogen and digestibility of forages using near infrared reflectance photometry. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 61, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Windham, W.R., Hill, N.S., & Stuedemann, J.A. (1991). Ash in forage, esophageal, and faecal samples analyzed using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Science, 31, 1345–1349.Google Scholar
  70. Yeh, T.F., Yamada, T., Capanema, E., Chang, H.M., Chiang, V., & Kadla, J.F. (2005). Rapid Screening of Wood Chemical Component Variations Using Transmittance Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 53, 3328–3332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Vávrová
    • 1
  • Bo Stenberg
    • 2
  • Marjut Karsisto
    • 3
  • Veikko Kitunen
    • 3
  • Tarja Tapanila
    • 3
  • Raija Laiho
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Forest EcologyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Soil SciencesSLUSweden
  3. 3.Vantaa Research UnitFinnish Forest Research InstituteFinland
  4. 4.Department of Forest EcologyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations