Skip to main content

The Role of Vegetation in Phosphorus Removal by Cold Climate Constructed Wetland: The Effects of Aeration and Growing Season

  • Chapter
Wastewater Treatment, Plant Dynamics and Management in Constructed and Natural Wetlands

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and contribution of Schoenoplectus fluviatilis (Torr.) (river bulrush) to phosphorus (P) removal from dairy-farm effluent in a cold climate constructed wetland. After 3 years of operation (1,073 days), both nonaerated wetland cell 3 (C3) and aerated cell 4 (C4) exhibited a sharp decline in dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) storage, indicating wetlands saturation. The quantities of DRP stored during the three growing seasons (433 days) represented only 10.0%(C3) and 17.7%(C4) of the total amount of DRP (435.06 ± 2.3 g m–2, 97.02 kg) added to each cell (C3 and C4) over the entire 3-year period. However, of the total DRP retained by both wetland cells during 1,073 days of operation, the quantities stored during the three growing seasons (433 days) represented 50.3%(C3) and 36.50%(C4) of the total DRP retention. This indicated that vegetation had an important role in the overall DRP storage regardless of supplemental aeration. Overall, nonaerated C3 DRP mass removal efficiency during the 3-year period of investigation was low, averaging 19.9%. Aerated C4 DRP mass removal efficiency was 2.4-fold higher, averaging 48.4%. Belowground (BG) biomass had significantly higher (p < 0.001) P content than aboveground (AG) biomass, throughout the 3-year period of investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • APHA, AWWA, and WEF (1998). In A.D. Eaton, L.S. Clesceri, & A.E. Greenberg (Eds.), Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 19th ed. Washington DC: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W.C., Hook, P.B., Biederman, J.A., & Stein, O.R. (2002). Temperature and wetland plant species effects on wastewater treatment and root zone oxidation. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, 1010–1016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brix, H. (1997). Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands?. Water Science and Technology, 35(5), 11–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brix, H., Schierup, H.-H., & Arias, C. (2006). Twenty years experience with constructed wetland systems in Denmark – what did we learn? In Proceedings Of the 10th International Conference Constructed Wetlands for Water Pollution Control (pp. 1633–1641). MAOTDR: Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, P. (2007). The Constructed Wetland Association UK database of constructed wetland systems. Water Science & Technology 56(3), 1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DiPietro, T. (2004). Wastewater strength and forced aeration impacts on root architecture, plant biomass, and wastewater treatment of three plant species using laboratory-scale wetland cells. MS Thesis, University of Vermont, Burlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drizo, A., Twohig, E., Weber, D., Bird, S., & Ross, D. (2006). Constructed wetlands for dairy effluent treatment in Vermont: 36 months of operation. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference Constructed Wetlands for Water Pollution Control (pp. 1611–1621). MAOTDR: Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschall, N., Boutin, C., Crolla, A., Kinsley, C., & Champagne, P. (2007). The role of plants in the removal of nutrients at a constructed wetland treating agricultural (dairy) wastewater, Ontario, Canada. Ecological Engineering, 29, 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D.A. (1989) (ed). Constructed Wetlands for Waste Water Treatment: Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, P.G., & Poach, M.E. (2001). State of the art for animal wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 44 (11–12), 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, T.S., Stratton, G.W., Gordon, R., & Madani, A. (2003). The use of aeration to enhance ammonia nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands. Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 45, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R.H. (1999). The limits of phosphorus removal in wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 7, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R.H., & Knight, R. (1996). Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R.H., Knight, R., Vymazal, J., Brix, H., Cooper, P., & Haberl, R. (2000). Constructed Wetlands for Pollution Control. Published by International Water Association, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, J., & Idler, C. (1999). Treatment of domestic and agricultural wastewater by reed bed systems. Ecological Engineering, 12, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R.L., Payne, V.W.E., Borer, R.E., Clarke, R.A., & Pries, J.H. (2000). Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecological Engineering, 15, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luderitz, V., & Gerlach, F. (2002). Phosphorus removal in different constructed wetlands. Acta Biotechnologica, 22, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, P., Drizo, A., & Hessoin, C. (2006). Flow patterns of dairy farm wastewater constructed wetlands in a cold climate. Water Research, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellet-Plamondon, C., Chazarenc, C., Comeau, Y., & Brisson, J. (2006). Artificial aeration to increase pollutant removal efficiency of constructed wetlands in cold climate. Ecological Engineering, 27, 258–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, C.R., Lauchlan, F.H., & Steer, D. (2005). The interacting effects of temperature and plant community type on nutrient removal in wetland microcosms. Bioresource Technology, 96, 1039–1047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K.R., & Smith, W.H. (1987). Aquatic plants for water treatment and resource recovery. Orlando, FL: Magnolia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaafsma, J.A., Baldwin, A.H., & Streb, C.A. (2000). An evaluation of a constructed wetland to treat wastewater from a dairy farm in Maryland, USA. Ecological Engineering, 14, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serodes, J.B., & Normand, D. (1999). Phosphorus removal in agricultural wastewater by a recently constructed wetland. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 26, 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., Gordon, R., Madani, A., & Stratton, G. (2005). Cold climate hydrological flow characteristics of constructed wetlands. Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 47, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C.C., Clayton, J.S., & Upsell, M.P. (1995). Effect of loading rate and planting on treatment of dairy farm wastewaters in constructed wetlands-II. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Research, 29, 27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C.C. (2001) Growth and nutrient dynamics of soft-stem bulrush in constructed wetlands treating nutrient-rich wastewaters. Wetlands Ecology and Management 9, 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (2006). Constructed wetlands with emergent macrophytes: from experiments to a high quality treatment technology. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Constructed Wetlands for Water Pollution Control (pp. 3–27). MAOTDR: Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J., Brix, H., Cooper, P.F., Green, M.B., & Haberl, R. (1998). Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S., Parkin, G., & Cross, C. (2001). Cold Climate Wetlands: Design & Performance. Water Sci Tech. 44(11–12), 259–265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, D., Drizo, A., Twohig, E., Bird, S., & Ross, D. (2007). Upgrading Constructed Wetlands Phosphorus Reduction from a Dairy Effluent using EAF Steel Slag Filters. Water Science and Technology 56(3), 135–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drizo, A., Seitz, E., Twohig, E., Weber, D., Bird, S., Ross, D. (2008). The Role of Vegetation in Phosphorus Removal by Cold Climate Constructed Wetland: The Effects of Aeration and Growing Season. In: Vymazal, J. (eds) Wastewater Treatment, Plant Dynamics and Management in Constructed and Natural Wetlands. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8235-1_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics