Skip to main content
  • 3085 Accesses

Constructed wetland Břehov for 100 PE was put in operation in October 2003. It is a typical horizontal subsurface flow system designed to treat municipal wastewater in the Czech Republic. Vegetated beds with a total surface area of 504 m2 are filled with washed gravel (4–8 mm) and planted with bands of Phalaris arundinacea and Phragmites australis. During the period 2004–2006, the treatment performance and vegetation growth were regularly monitored. The average treatment effects for BOD5, COD and suspended solids were high and amounted to 88%, 77% and 88%, respectively. The average outflow BOD5, COD and TSS concentrations during the monitored period were 16.5 mg l–1, 78.3 mg l–1 and 19.2 mg l–1, respectively. Removal of TN and TP amounted to 45% and 40%, with respective average outflow concentrations of 28 mg l–1 and 4.3 mg l–1. These results are quite commonly achieved in horizontal subsurface constructed wetlands in the Czech Republic. The results also indicated that during the warm period (May–October) treatment efficiency for nitrogen and phosphorus was higher than that during cold period of the year (November–April). Removal of organics and suspended solids was not affected by the season. Phalaris reached its aboveground biomass during the second growing season (2,265 g m–2), while Phragmites increased its biomass over the 3-year period (2,532 g m–2). The nutrient aboveground standing stocks were comparable with those observed in natural stands and did not exceed 5.3% and 6.2% of the inflow load of phosphorus and nitrogen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Behrends, L.L., Bailey, E., Bulls, M.J., Coonrod, H.S., & Sikora, F.J. (1994). Seasonal trends in growth and biomass accumulation of selected nutrients and metals in six species of emergent aquatic macrophytes. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control (pp. 274–289). Guangzhou, P.R., China: ICWS’94 Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J.M., & Lauve, T.E. (1995). A comparison of growth and nutrient uptake in Phalaris arundinacea L. growing in a wetland and a constructed bed receiving landfill leachate. Wetlands, 15, 176–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brix, H. (1997). Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands?. Water Science and Technology, 35(5), 11–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brix, H., & Schierup, H.-H. (1989). The use of aquatic macrophytes in water pollution control. Ambio, 18, 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čížková-Končalová, H., Květ, J., & Lukavská, J. (1996). Response of Phragmites australis, Glyceria maxima and Typha latifolia to addition of piggery sewage in a flooded sand culture. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 4, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gries, C., & Garbe, D. (1989). Biomass, nitrogen, phosphorus and heavy metal content of Phragmites australis during the third growing season in a root zone waste water treatment. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 117, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, R., & Perfler, R. (1990). Seven years of research work and experience with wastewater treatment by a reed bed system. In P.F. Cooper & B.C. Findlater (Eds.), Constructed wetlands in water pollution control (pp. 205–214). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen, P.D., & Mæhlum, T. (2003). Treatment performance of multistage wastewater constructed wetlands in Norway. In Ü. Mander, C. Vohla, & A. Poom (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Constructed and Riverine Wetlands for Optimal Control of Wastewater at Catchment Scale (pp. 11–16). Tartu, Estonia: University of Tartu, Institute of Geography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C.A. (1991). Sediments and nutrient retention by freshwater wetlands: Effects on surface water quality. CRC Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 21, 491–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R.H., Axler, R., McCarthy, B., & Henneck, J. (2003). Subsurface treatment wetlands in the cold climate in Minnestota. In Ü. Mander & P. Jenssen (Eds.), Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in cold climates (pp. 19–52). Southampton, UK: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Květ, J., Dušek, J., & Husák, Š. (1999). Vascular plants suitable for wastewater treatment in temperate zones. In J. Vymazal (Ed.), Nutrient cycling and retention in natural and constructed wetlands (pp. 101–110). Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W.J., & Gosselink, J.G. (2000). Wetlands, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (1995). Algae and element cycling in wetlands. Chelsea, MI: Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (1998). Czech Republic. In J. Vymazal, H. Brix, P.F. Cooper, M.B. Green, & R. Haberl (Eds.), Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe (pp. 95–121). Leiden, Netherlands: Backhuys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (2004). Élimination du phosphore par faucardage de la fraction aérienne de la végétation dans les marais artificiels pour le traitement des eaux usées. Ingénieries eau agriculture territoires, Special issue, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (2005). Removal of nitrogen via harvesting of emergent vegetation in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. In J. Vymazal (Ed.), Natural and constructed wetlands: Nutrients, metals and management (pp. 209–221). Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (2006). The use constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic. In A.R. Burk (Ed.), Focus on ecology research (pp. 175–196). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (2007). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 380, 48–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J., & Kröpfelová, L. (2005). Growth of Phragmites australis and Phalaris arundinacea in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic. Ecological Engineering, 25, 606–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J., Brix, H., Cooper, P.F., Haberl, R., Perfler, R., & Laber, J. (1998). Removal mechanisms and types of constructed wetlands. In J. Vymazal, H. Brix, P.F. Cooper, M.B. Green & R. Haberl (Eds.), Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe (pp. 17–66). Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J., Dušek, J., & Květ, J. (1999). Nutrient uptake and storage by plants in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: a comparative study. In J. Vymazal (Ed.), Nutrient cycling and retention in natural and constructed wetlands (pp. 85–100), Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Züst, B., & Schönborn, A. (2003). Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in cold climates: Planted soil filter Schattweid – 13 years’ experience. In Ü. Mander & P. Jenssen (Eds.), Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in cold climates (pp. 53–68). Southampton, UK: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kröpfelová, L. (2008). Constructed Wetland Břehov: Three Years of Monitoring. In: Vymazal, J. (eds) Wastewater Treatment, Plant Dynamics and Management in Constructed and Natural Wetlands. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8235-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics