In this study three general claims are made. (1) Aristotle’s logic conflates methodology and epistemology. (2) Aristotle’s conflation of methodology and epistemology has had a tremendous influence upon the development of logic. (3) George Boole’s extensionalism has undone the Aristotelian conflation. It, thus, cleared the road for modern logic, for the study of logic as a methodology-in-the-weak-sense.
We should begin by a brief inspection of the background to Aristotle’s conflation of methodology and epistemology: the pre-history of logic. For the conflation clearly prevails in the most rudimentary conceptions of logical proof that we know of. It is appropriate to begin, then, with a few notes on Parmenides poem, for Parmenides has been called ‘the father of logical proof’ and even ‘the father of logical indirect proof.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). The Mother of All Conflations: Parmenides' Proof. In: Extensionalism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8168-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8168-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8167-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8168-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)