Skip to main content

Sensor Management

  • Chapter
Wireless Sensor Networks
  • 963 Accesses

Abstract

Sensors are deployed in a sensor network for the purpose of providing data about environmental phenomena to the sink node(s). As not all sensors may be able to transmit their data directly to the sink(s), sensors must also route other sensors’ data. Therefore, sensors must assume roles of both data provider and router. However, there are often many more sensors in the network than are needed at a given time to accomplish these tasks. Sensor management is needed to assign roles to each sensor, so that nodes that are not needed at a given time can enter a sleep state to save energy until they are needed, thereby extending network lifetime. The area of sensor management, as defined here, includes topology control--choosing which nodes should be routers to ensure a connected network—and sensing mode selection—choosing which nodes should sense data to meet application requirements (application QoS). It is possible to maximize network lifetime by finding optimal schedules of when each node should perform each function. However, these optimizations are computationally intensive, require global knowledge, and are not robust to changes in network topology. Therefore, there is a need for distributed, robust, and computationally efficient sensor management protocols that extend network lifetime while ensuring that application goals are met. In this chapter, protocols for both topology control and sensing mode selection are described and a qualitative comparison of these protocols is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bhardwaj, M. and A. Chandrakasan: 2002, ‘Bounding the Lifetime of Sensor Networks Via Optimal Role Assignments’. In: Proceedings of the Twenty First lnternational Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blough, D., M. Leoncini, G. Resta, and P. Santi: 2003, ‘The K-Neigh Protocol for Symmetric Topology Control in Ad Hoc Networks’. In: Proceedings of MobiHOC.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cerpa, A. and D. Estrin: 2002, ‘ASCENT: Adaptive Self-configuring sEnsor Networks Topologies’. In: Proceedings of the Twenty First International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, B., K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Morris: 2000, ‘Span: An Energy-Efficient Coordination Algorithm for Topology Maintenance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks’. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chu, M., H. Haussecker, and F. Zhao: 2002, ‘Scalable Information-Driven Sensor Querying and Routing for Ad Hoc Heterogeneous Sensor Networks’. lnternational Journal of High Pe$ormance Computing Applications 16(3).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ertin, E., J. W. F. III, and L. C. Potter: 2003, ‘Maximum Mutual Information Principle for Dynamic Sensor Query Problems’. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta, H., S. Das, and Q. Gu: 2003, ‘Connected Sensor Cover: Self-organization of Sensor Networks for Efficient Query Execution’. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gutierrez, J. A., M. Naeve, E. Callaway, M. Bourgeois, V. Mitter, and B. Heile: 2001, ‘IEEE 802.15.4: A Developing Standard for Low-Power, LowCost Wireless Personal Area Networks’. IEEE Network 15(5), 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haartsen, J., M. Naghshineh, J. Inouye, 0. Joeressen, and W. Allen: 1998, ‘Bluetooth: Vision, Goals, and Architecture’. Mobile Computing and Communications Review 2(4), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heinzelman, W., A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan: 2002, ‘An Application-Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor Networks’. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 1(4), 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hui, J., Z. Ren, and B. H. Krogh: 2003, ‘Sentry-Based Power Management in Wireless Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ishwar, P., A. Kumar, and K. Ramchandran: 2003, ‘Distributed Sampling for Dense Sensor Networks: A Bit-Conservation Principle’. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iyer, R. and L. Kleinrock: 2003a, ‘QoS Control For Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the IEEE lnternational Conference on Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iyer, R. and L. Kleinrock: 2003b, ‘Scalable Sensor Network Resolution’. In: Proceedings of Sensys.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kalpakis, K., K. Dasgupta, and P. Namjoshi: 2002, ‘Maximum Lifetime Data Gathering and Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Networking.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Q. and D. Rus: 2000, ‘Sending Messages to Mobile Users in Disconnected Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks’. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lindsey, S., C. Raghavendra, and K. Sivalingam: 2002, ‘Data Gathering Algorithms in Sensor Networks Using Energy Metrics’. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 13(9), 924–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, J., P. Cheung, L. Guibas, and F. Zhao: 2002, ‘A Dual-Space Approach to Tracking and Sensor Management in Wireless Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meguerdichian, S., F. Koushinfar, M. Potkonjak, and M. Srivastava: 2001, ‘Coverage Problems in Wireless Ad-hoc Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pattem, S., S. Poduri, and B. Krishnamachari: 2003, ‘Energy-Quality Tradeoffs for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perillo, M. and W. Heinzelman: 2003a, ‘Sensor Management and Routing Protocols For Prolonging Network Lifetime (Technical Report)’. In: University of Rochester Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perillo, M. and W. Heinzelman: 2003b, ‘Simple Approaches for Providing Application QoS Trhough Intelligent Sensor Management’. Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks Journal l(2–3), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramanathan, R. and R. Hain: 2000, ‘Topology Control of Multihop Wireless Networks Using Transmit Power Adjustment’. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rodoplu, V. and T. Meng: 1998, ‘Minimum Energy Mobile Wireless Networks’. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schurgers, C., V. Tsiatsis, S. Ganeriwal, and M. Srivastava: 2002, ‘Optimizing Sensor Networks in the Energy-Latency-Density Design Space’. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 1(1), 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sternm, M. and R. H. Katz: 1997, ‘Measuring and reducing energy consumption of network interfaces in hand-held devices’. IElCE Transactions on Communications ESO-B(8), 1125–31.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tian, D. and N. Georganas: 2003, ‘A Node Scheduling Scheme for Energy Conservation in Large Wireless Sensor Networks’. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Journal 3(2), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tilak, S., N. Abu-Ghazaleh, and W. Heinzelman: 2002, ‘Infrastructure Tradeoffs for Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the First ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tseng, Y., Y. Chang, and P. Tseng: 2002, ‘Energy-Efficient Topology Control for Wireless Ad Hoc Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, X., G. Xing, Y. Zhang, C. Lu, R. Pless, and C. Gill: 2003, ‘Integrated Coverage and Connectivity Configuration in Wireless Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of Sensys.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, Y., J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin: 2001, ‘Geography-informed Energy Conservation for Ad Hoc Routing’. In: Proceedings of the ACMIIEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yan, T., T. He, and J. A. Stankovic: 2003, ‘Differentiated Surveillance for Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of Sensys.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ye, F., G. Zhong, J. Cheng, S. Lu, and L. Zhang: 2003, ‘PEAS: A Robust Energy Conserving Protocol for Long-lived Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ye, W., J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin: 2002, ‘An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the Twenty First International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zou, Y. and K. Chakrabarty: 2003, ‘Target Localization Based on Energy Considerations in Distributed Sensor Networks’. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perillo, M., Heinzelman, W. (2004). Sensor Management. In: Raghavendra, C.S., Sivalingam, K.M., Znati, T. (eds) Wireless Sensor Networks. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7884-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7884-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-35269-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7884-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics