Skip to main content

Rankings and Classifications in Higher Education: A European Perspective

  • Chapter
Higher Education

Part of the book series: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 23))

As the number of students has grown, the number of higher education institutions, and the diversity of their mission has grown too. It has become difficult to consider them as a homogeneous group. Prioritization of activities and choice of mission have become a central concern. At the same time, globalization leads to increasing competitive pressures on institutions, in particular related to their position on global university rankings, for which their research performance is almost exclusively the measure. Key questions related to these two trends are: How do rankings affect diversity? What is their impact on institutional behavior and strategy? What is their relationship with classifications? It will be argued that in order to avoid an adverse effect on diversity, rankings should only be used within defined groups of comparable institutions (classifications) and that the development of indicators to measure performance areas other than research, such as teaching, needs to be advanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alesi, B., Burger, S., Kehm, B., & Teichler, U. (2005). Bachelor and Master courses in selected countries compared with Germany. Bonn/Berlin: Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (2006). The dilemmas of ranking. International Higher Education, 42, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1983). Maintaining diversity in higher education. Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2007). No world-class university left behind. International Higher Education, 47, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (2005). Measuring university quality. The Review of Higher Education, 29, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2006). League tables—do we have to live with them? Perspective, 10, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Higher Education Development (CHE) (2006). Study and research in Germany. University rankings, published in association with Die Zeit. Retrieved March 16, 2006, from http://www.daad.de/deutschland/studium/ hochschulranking/04708.en.html.

  • Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS) (2005). The European higher education and research landscape 2020. Scenarios and strategic debates. Enschede: CHEPS, University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2007). The impact of higher education rankings on student access, choice, and opportunity. In College and university ranking systems. Global perspectives and American challenges. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • CWTS (2007). The Leiden ranking. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://www.cwts.nl/cwts/LeidenRankingWebsite.html

  • Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (UK) (2004). The future of higher education. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/hegateway/uploads/White%20Pape.pdf

  • Dill, D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university rankings. Higher Education, 49, 495–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EUA (2006). The contribution of universities to Europe’s competitiveness. Speech of EUA President Prof. Georg Winckler to the Conference of the European Ministers of Education, Vienna, March 16–17, 2006. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/EUA_Winckler_Speech_160306.1142503291 615.pdf

  • European Commission (EC) (2003). Communication from the Commission. The role of universities in the Europe of knowledge. COM (2003) 58 final. Brussels: EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2005). Communication from the Commission. Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: Enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy. COM (2005) 152 final. Brussels: EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R., & Cook, P. (1995). The winner-take-all society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino. C., Ridgeway, G., Chun, M., & Buddin, R. (2005). Latent variable analysis: A new approach to university ranking. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl, E. (2001). The intrusion and expansion of community policies in higher education. Higher Education Management, 13(3), 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2007). The impact of league tables and ranking systems on higher education decision-making. Higher Education Management and Policy. Vol 19(2), pp. 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., & van der Wende, M.C. (Eds.) (2004). On cooperation and competition. National and European policies for internationalisation of higher education. ACA Papers on International Cooperation. Bonn: Lemmens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., & van der Wende, M.C. (Eds.) (2005). On cooperation and competition II. Institutional responses to internationalisation, Europeanisation and globalisation. ACA Papers on International Cooperation. Bonn: Lemmens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP) (2007). College and university ranking systems. Global perspectives and American challenges. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirp, D. (2004). Shakespeare, Einstein and the bottom-line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N., & Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lub, A., van der Wende, M., & Witte, J. (2003). The implementation of the bachelor- master system in Germany and the Netherlands, TEAM, 9, 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006). Global university rankings at the end of 2006: Is this the hierarchy we have to have? Paper presented at the OECD/IMHE & HRK seminar on Institutional diversity: Rankings and typologies in higher education. Bonn, Germany, December 4–5, 2006. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/people/staff_pages/Marginson/IMHE_Bonn_ranki ngs041206.pdf

  • Marginson, S. (2007). Going global: Trends in higher education and research in the APEC region. Paper presented at the APEC HRDWG Symposium on Education Policy Challenges. Brisbane, April 17, 2007. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/people/staff_pages/Marginson/APEC_HRDWG_Symposium_170407.pdf

  • Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M.C. (2007a). Globalization and higher education. Education Working Paper No. 8. Paris: OECD. Retrieved July 6, 2007, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/12/38918635.pdf

  • Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M.C. (2007b). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal for Studies in International Education. Vol. 11 (3–4), pp. 274–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, I. (2004). Unified national system or uniform national system? The Australian experience. Paper to CHE conference, Berlin, April 29–30, 2004. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from www.che.de/news.php?id=183

  • Müller-Böling, D., & Federkeil, G. (2007). The CHE-Ranking of German, Swiss and Austrian universities. In J. Sadlac & Lui Nian Cai (Eds.). The world-class university and ranking: Aiming beyond status. Paris: UNESCO-CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) (2007). The power of information: How do US News rankings affect the financial resources of public colleges? Cambridge, MA: NBER. Retrieved 3 May, 2007, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12941

  • Reichert, S., & Tauch, C. (2005). Trends IV: European universities implementing Bologna. Brussels: EUA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., & Thompson, L. (2007). Reputation management for universities. University league tables and the impact on student recruitment. Working Paper Series, 2. The Knowledge Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocki, M. (2005). Statistical and mathematical aspects of ranking: Lessons from Poland. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadlac, J. (2007). Development in higher education and how they stimulate the university rankings’ phenomenon. In The world-class university and ranking: Aiming beyond status, 75–87. Paris: UNESCO-CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadlac, J., & Liu, L.N. (Eds.) (2007). The world-class university and ranking: Aiming beyond status. Paris: UNESCO-CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmi, J., & Saroyan, A. (2006). League tables as policy instruments: Uses and misuses. Higher Education Management and Policy. Vol 19(2), pp. 24–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, M., & McCormick, A. (2006). Revision of the Carnegie classifications. In Special Issue - AIR Alert #25. Update 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (2004). Hierarchy or diversity? Dilemmas for 21st-century higher education. Paper to CHE conference, Berlin, April 29–30, 2004. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from www.che.de/news.php?id=183

  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University Institute of Higher Education (SJTUIHE) (2007). Academic ranking of world universities. Retrieved May 4, 2007, from http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm

  • The Times Higher (2006). World university rankings. The Times Higher Education Supplement. Retrieved April 10, 2006, from www.thes.co.uk [subscription required]

  • UNESCO/IHEP (2006). International partnership issues groundbreaking principles on ranking of higher education institutions. Retrieved June 3, 2007, from http://www.che.de/downloads/Berlin_Principles_IREG_534.pdf

  • Usher, A., & Savino, M. (2007). A global survey of rankings and league tables. In College and university ranking systems. Global perspectives and American challenges, 23–35. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, D (2006). Diversity and typology of institutions: Policy perspectives. Paper presented at the OECD/IMHE & HRK Seminar on Institutional diversity: Rankings and typologies in higher education. Bonn, Germany, December 4–5, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wende, M.C. (2007). European responses to global competition in higher education. Paper presented at the symposium on Crisis of the publics. Centre for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 26–27, March 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, N. (2005). Twenty years of university reports cards. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A.F.J. (2007). Challenges in the ranking of universities. In J. Sadlac & Lui Nian Cai (Eds.). The world-class university and ranking: Aiming beyond status. Paris: UNESCO-CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F.A. (1996). Isomorphism in higher education? Towards a theory of differentiation and diversity in higher education systems. In L.V. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen & R. Rinne (Eds.). The Mockers and the mocked: Comparative perspective on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education. Oxford: IAU.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F.A. (2006a). Higher education system dynamics and useful knowledge creation. In J. Duderstadt & L. Weber (Eds.). Universities and business: Partnering for the knowledge society. New York: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F.A. (2006b). Conclusions. Paper presented at the OECD/IMHE & HRK seminar on Institutional diversity: Rankings and typologies in higher education. Bonn, Germany, December 4–5, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F.A., Bartelse, J., Bohmert, D., Burquel, N., Divis, J., Huisman, J., & van der Wende, M.C. (2005). Institutional profiles. Towards a typology of higher education institutions in Europe. Report to the European Commission. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from http://www.utwente.nl/cheps/documenten/engreport05institutionalprofiles.pdf

  • Williams, R., & Van Dyke, N. (2007). Measuring university performance at the discipline/departmental level. Paper to the Griffith University Symposium on International trends in university rankings and classifications. Griffith University, Brisbane, February 12, 2007. Retrieved June 19, 2007, from http://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/university-rankings/

  • Witte, J. (2006). Change of degrees and degrees of change. Comparing adaptations of European higher education systems in the cntext of the Bologna process. Doctoral dissertation. Enschede: CHEPS, University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Wende, M. (2008). Rankings and Classifications in Higher Education: A European Perspective. In: Smart, J.C. (eds) Higher Education. Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6959-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics