Skip to main content

Economic Models and Policy Analysis in Higher Education: A Diagrammatic Exposition

  • Chapter
Higher Education

Part of the book series: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 23))

This chapter uses diagrams and narration to illustrate how economists utilize models of decision making behavior to analyze higher education policies. Models of the behavior of decision-makers consider their goals and the constraints they face in pursuing those goals. Many higher education policies influence the constraints—on income, information or time—that decision-makers face, and economics provides analytical frameworks that are particularly useful for understanding and evaluating the effectiveness of such policies. The chapter details how human capital theory—the most widely-used theoretical framework in economics of education—and a model of the market for investment in higher education are applied to analyze higher education policies regarding student access. The presentation is intended as an introduction to economic models and higher education policy analysis for scholars, administrators, and policymakers who are not trained in economics, but would like to understand how economics can be used to analyze higher education policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altonji, J. G., & Dunn, T. A. (1996). Using siblings to estimate the effect of school quality on wages. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (4): 665–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai, K. (1998). The economics of education: An analysis of college-going behavior. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O., & Rouse, C. (2000). Schooling, intelligence and income in America. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, and S. Durlauf (eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 89–117). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averett, S. L., & Burton, M. L. (1996). College attendance and the wage premium: Differences by gender. Economics of Education Review 15 (1): 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, C., & Hoxby, C. M. (2004). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? In C. M. Hoxby (ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 239–302). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, C., & Kane, T. J. (2004). Student perceptions of college opportunities: The Boston COACH Program. In C. M. Hoxby (ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 355–394). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battistin, E., & Rettore, E. (2002). Testing for programme effects in a regression discontinuity design with imperfect compliance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 165 (1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S. (2004). A primer on economics for financial aid professionals. New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S., & Payea, K. (2004). Education pays 2004: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Washington, DC: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. A. (1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy 70 (Supplement): 9–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R., Kletzer, L. G., McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1992). The college investment decision: Direct and indirect effects of family background on choice of postsecondary enrollment and quality. Discussion Paper Series No. 18. Williamstown, MA: Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfield, C. R. (2000). Economic principles for education: Theory and evidence. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977a). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977b). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1977). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breneman, D. W., & Nelson, S. C. (1981). Financing community colleges: An economic perspective. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (2003). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (1995). Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling. In L. Christophides, E. Grant, & R. Swidinsky (eds.), Aspects of labor market behavior: Essays in honor of John Vanderkamp. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Volume 3A) (pp. 1801–1863). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (2001). Estimating the return to schooling: Progress on some persistent econometric problems. Econometrica 69(5): 1127–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., & Krueger, A. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy 100 (1): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., & Krueger, A. (1996). The economic return to school quality. In W. Becker & W. Baumol (eds.), Assessing educational practices: The contribution of economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (1995). Rates of return to education. In M. Carnoy (ed.), International encyclopedia of economics of education (2nd ed.). Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checchi, D. (2006). The economics of education: Human capital, family background and inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipillone, P. (1995). Education and earnings. In M. Carnoy (ed.), International encyclopedia of economics of education (2nd ed.). Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, E., & Geske, T. (1990). The economics of education (3rd ed.). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catsiapis, G. (1987). A model of educational investment decisions. Review of Economics and Statistics 69: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement): 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Entrance Examination Board (1971). The college choices of thirty black project opportunity students. Atlanta, GA: College Entrance Examination Board. ED 062914.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Board, The (2006a). Trends in college pricing 2006. Washington, DC: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Board, The (2006b). Trends in student aid 2006. Washington, DC: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (1999). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection and unobservables. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. W7322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (1): 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2005). Are students really rational? The development of rational thought and its application to student choice. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Volume 20) (pp. 191–240). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynarski, S. (2003). Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. American Economic Review 93 (1): 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynarski, S. (2004). The new merit aid. In C. M. Hoxby (ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 63–100). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., & Smith, R. S. (2006). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy (9th ed.). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenske, R. H., Geranios, C. A, Keller, J. E., & Moore, D. E. (1997). Early intervention programs: Opening the door to higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (2003). Microeconomics and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. (1976). The overeducated American. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, D. T., & Kane, T. J. (2000). Who is getting a college education? Family background and the growing gaps in enrollment. In S. Danziger & J. Waldfogel (eds.), Securing the future: Investing in children from birth to college (pp. 283–324). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatima, N., & Paulsen, M. B. (2004). Higher education and state workforce productivity in the 1990s. Thought and Action: NEA Higher Education Journal 20 (1): 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, J., Todd, P., & Van der Klaauw, W. (2001). Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69 (3): 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47: 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1990). Varieties of selection bias. American Economic Review 80: 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies 65: 261–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (1997). Student price response in higher education: An update to Leslie and Brinkman. Journal of Higher Education 68: 624–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (1999). The effects of tuition and state financial aid on public college enrollment. Review of Higher Education 23 (1): 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (2006). State support of higher education: Past, present, and future. In D. M. Priest & E. P. St. John (eds.), Privatization and public universities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, E. M. (2001). Understanding equity and access in higher education: The potential contribution of Pierre Bourdieu. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Volume 16). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., & Schmit, J. (1995). The Indiana postsecondary-encouragement experiment. In E. P. St. John (ed.), Rethinking tuition and student aid strategies. New Directions for Higher Education No. 89. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Schmit, J., & Vesper, N. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2005). The investment payoff: A fifty-state analysis of the public and private benefits of higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schools in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1979). Who gets ahead? The determinants of economic success in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1999). Aptitude or achievement: Why do test scores predict education attainment and earnings? In S. E. Mayer & P. E. Peterson (eds.), Earning and learning: How schools matter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, G. (1993). The economics of education. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J. (1995). Rising public college tuition and college entry: How well do public subsidies promote access to college? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J. (1999). The price of admission: Rethinking how Americans pay for college. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, B. E., & Hotchkiss, J. L. (2000). The economics of labor markets (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korenman, S., & Winship, C. (2000). A reanalysis of The Bell Curve: Intelligence, family background and schooling. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 137–178). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory 6: 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. L., & Brinkman, P. T. (1988). The economic value of higher education. New York: American Council on Education/MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B. T. (2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics 121: 271–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G. (2007). Principles of microeconomics, 4th Edition. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F., & Wise, D. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Charles, C. Z., Lundy, G. F., & Fischer, M. J. (2003). The source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America’s selective colleges and universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., & MacPherson, D. A. (2003). Contemporary labor economics (6th ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEachern, W. (2006). Microeconomics: A contemporary introduction (with InfoTrac), 7th Edition. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W. (1976). Influences on investment by blacks in higher education. American Economic Review 66 (2): 320–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W. (1984). Why families invest in education. In S. Sudman & M. A. Spaeth (eds.), The collection and analysis of economic and consumer behavior data: In memory of Robert Ferber (pp. 75–91). Urbana, IL: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W. (1991). Improving higher education through increased efficiency. In D. H. Finifter, R. G. Baldwin, & J. R. Thelin (eds.), The uneasy public policy triangle in higher education: Quality, diversity, and budgetary efficiency (pp. 143–161). New York: ACE/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W., & Wagner, A. P. (1982). The monetary returns to education as partial social efficiency criteria. In W. W. McMahon & T. G. Geske (eds.), Financing education: Overcoming inefficiency and inequity. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1991). Keeping college affordable: Government and educational opportunity. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2007). Retrieved July 25,2007,from http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/policy.

  • Mincer, J. (1993). The distribution of labor incomes: A survey. In J. Mincer (ed.), Studies in human capital: Collected essays of Jacob Mincer. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, J. (2000). The returns to individual and college characteristics: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Economics of Education Review 19: 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumper, M. (1996). Removing college price barriers. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumper, M., & Freeman, M. L. (2005). The causes and consequences of public college tuition inflation. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Volume 20) (pp. 307–361). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. M., & Welch, F. (1989). Wage premiums for college graduates: Recent growth and possible explanations. Educational Researcher 18 (4): 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. M., & Welch, F. (1992). The structure of wages. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (1): 285–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Digest of education statistics 2005. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, M. (2004). Investing in human capital: A capital markets approach to student funding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. (1990). College choice: Understanding student enrollment behavior. Report No. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B. (1998). Recent research on the economics of attending college: Returns on investment and responsiveness to price. Research in Higher Education 39 (4): 471–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B. (2000). Economic perspectives on rising college tuition: A theoretical and empirical exploration. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Volume 15) (pp. 39–104). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B. (2001a). The economics of human capital and investment in higher education. In M. B. Paulsen & J. C. Smart (eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice. (pp. 55–94). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B. (2001b). The economics of the public sector: The nature and role of public policy in the finance of higher education. In M. B. Paulsen & J. C. Smart (eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp. 95–132). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & Fatima, N. (2007). Higher education and growth in state workforce productivity, 1980–2000: Evidence of the public benefits of college. In P. B. Richards (ed.), Global issues in higher education (pp. 37–56). F. Columbus (ed.), Higher education research perspectives. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & Pogue, T. F. (1988). Higher education enrollment: The interaction of labor market conditions, curriculum and selectivity. Economics of Education Review 7 (3): 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & Smart, J. C. (eds.) (2001). The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice. New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & St. John, E. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education 73: 189–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2006a). Economics and IR: Expanding the connections and applications. In R. K. Toutkoushian & M. B. Paulsen (eds.), Applying economics to institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research No. 132 (pp. 95–104). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2006b). Overview of economic concepts, models and methods for institutional research. In R. K. Toutkoushian & M. B. Paulsen (eds.), Applying economics to institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research No. 132 (pp. 5–24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2000). Differences in the decision to enroll in college among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Higher Education 71: 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2005). The key to college access: A college preparatory curriculum. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. E. Colyar (eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 113–134). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Volume 21) (pp. 99–157). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education 76 (5): 485–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2005). Microeconomics, 5th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1973). Returns to education: An international comparison. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, C. E. (1994). What to do after high school: The two-year versus four-year college enrollment decision. In R. G. Ehrenberg (ed.), Choices and consequences: Contemporary policy issues in education (pp. 59–88). New York: IRL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, R. W. (1984). The changing economic benefits of college graduates. Economics of Education Review 3: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 51: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1976). Causes and consequences of higher education: models of the status attainment process. In W. H. Sewell, R. M. Hauser, & D. L. Featherman (eds.), Schooling and achievement in American society. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, D. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E. P. (1994). Prices, productivity, and investment: Assessing financial strategies in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 3. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E. P. (2003). Refinancing the college dream: Access, equal opportunity, and justice for taxpayers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, P., & Wales, T. (1974). Higher education and earnings: College as an investment and a screening device. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. L., & Perna, L. W. (2004). The opportunity agenda: A reexamination of postsecondary reward and opportunity. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Volume 19) (pp. 43–84). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. (1970). Investment in human capital. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. C. (1975). Generating inequality: Mechanisms of distribution in the U.S. economy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian, R., & Paulsen, M. (eds.) (2006). Applying economics to institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 132. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2003). Education policy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhall, M. (1995). Human capital concepts. In M. Carnoy (ed.), International encyclopedia of economics of education (2nd ed.). Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & Thomas, S. L. (2005). Investments in human capital: Sources of variation in the return to college quality. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Volume 20) (pp. 241–306). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paulsen, M.B., Toutkoushian, R.K. (2008). Economic Models and Policy Analysis in Higher Education: A Diagrammatic Exposition. In: Smart, J.C. (eds) Higher Education. Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6959-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics