Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation ((AGDN,volume 3))

  • 7389 Accesses

Emerson recognized and celebrated the unique beauty of each individual. Diversity consultants Frederick Miller and Judith Katz (2002) note that while on some level we are all alike as humans, we are like some others who share similar culture and experience, and finally, we are unique and like no other. Understanding individuals—ourselves and others—is crucial for members of a high-performing team since problematic interpersonal issues are destructive. Without that understanding, we are apt to think that others feel and respond as we do and if they do not something is wrong with them. Even if we have a clear handle on ourselves—our values, attitudes, and emotions—we may not understand how we impact others. Once we understand how we impact others, we might want to modify our behavior.

The importance of the tri-lens of overlapping personal, social, and cultural identities that members bring to a team was discussed in Chapter 1. The previous chapter looked at how that unique beauty is shaped by an individual’s culture; in this chapter we will look at the impact of membership in social identity groups, and unique aspects which influence individual behavior: personality and multiple intelligences. Models for personal change are presented. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss other aspects that influence individual behavior such as motivation, skills and experience, and learning style.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, N. (2002). International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior. Canada: South-Western Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, K. (2004). Social Intelligence: Beyond IQ. Training, 41(12), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allik, J. & McCrae, R. (2004). Toward a Geography of Personality Traits: Patterns of Profiles Across 36 Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R. (1999). Being the Only. In Reading Book for Human Relations Training (pp. 83-86). Alexandria, VA: NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. & Humphrey, R.H. (1995). Emotion in the Workplace: A Reappraisal. Human Relations, 48(2), 77–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamshad, M. & Olson, S. (2003). Does Race Exist? Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barger, N. (1992). The Myers Briggs—Crossing National Cultures. Cultural Diversity at Work, 4(6), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, R. (1997). Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical Manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, R. & Parker, J.D.A. (Eds.) (2000). The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment and Application at Home, School and in the Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barger, N. & Kirby, L.K. 2005. Working in a Multicultural World. Downloaded Feb. 10, 2005 from www.bargerkirby.com/services.

  • Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D. & Hay/McMer (1999). Emotional Competence Inventory. Boston, MA: HayGroup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B., Eber, H.W. & Tatsuoka, M.M. (1970). The Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F.M., Leung, K., Zhang, J.X., Sun, H.F., Gan, Y.Q., Song, W.Z. & Dong, X. (2001). Indigenous Chinese Personality Constructs: Is the Five-Factor Model Complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(4), 407–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carskadon, T. & Cook, D. (1982). Validity of MBTI Descriptions as Perceived by Recipients Unfamiliar with Type. Research in Psychological Type, 5, 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B.E. (1970). Social Psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connerley, M.L. & Pedersen, P.B. (2005). Leadership in a Diverse and Multicultural Environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., Jr. (1994). Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J.M. (1997). Higher-order Factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P.C. (2002). Redefining Interactions Across Cultures and Organizations: Moving Forward with Cultural Intelligence. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (Ed.) (2000). Emotion in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. (1997). The Personality Puzzle. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins, J.K. (1992). Myers Briggs: Valid with Co-Cultures? Cultural Diversity at Work, 5(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory and Practice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1975). On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. American Scientist, 63, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L.R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 36–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D.W. & Bartholomew, K. (1994). The Metaphysics of Measurement: The Case of Adult Attachment. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships (vol. 5, pp. 17–52). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, G.W. (1983). Group Versus Individual Performance: Are N + 1 Heads Better Than One? Psychological Bulletin 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P.J. & Howard, J.M. (2001). The Owner’s Manual for Personality at Work: How the Big Five Personality Traits Affect Performance, Communications, Teamwork, Leadership, and Sales. Austin, TX: Bard.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O.P. (1990). The “Big Five” Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in the Natural Language and in Questionnaires. In L.A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research (pp. 66–100). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. (2006). Privilege, Power and Difference. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey, D. (1998). Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey, D. & Bates, M. (1978). Please Understand Me: Character & Temperament Types. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, L.K. & Barger, N. (1998). Uses of Type in Multicultural Settings. In L.K. Myers, M.H. McCaulley, N.L. Quenk & A.L. Hammer (Eds.), MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (3rd ed. pp. 367–385). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, T. (1999). Remaking Teams. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R.M. (1986). Concepts and Theories of Human Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science, New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R.G., Klimoski, R. & Kanfer, R. (Eds.) (2002). Emotions in the Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. (2004). The MBTI is a Flawed Measure of Personality (http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/ cgi/eletters/328/7450/1244). bmj.com Rapid Responses

  • Mayer, J.D. Caruso, D. & Solovey, P. (1999). Emotional Intelligence Meets Traditional Standards for an Intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the Perspective of the Five Factor Model of Personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1997). Toward a New Generation of Personality Theories: Theoretical Contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In. J.S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R. & Allik, J. (Eds.) (2002). The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr., Martin, T., Oryol, V., Rukavishnikov, A., Senin, I., Hrebicková, M. & Tomáŝ, Urgbánek, T. (2004). Consensual Validation of Personality Traits Across Cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(2), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in Collectivist and Individualist Contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F.A. & Katz, J. (2002). The Inclusion Breakthrough: Unleashing the Real Power of Diversity. San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss Kanter, R. (1980). The Tale of O, On Being Different in an Organization. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I.B. & McCaulley, M.H. (1985). Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S.V. & Jackson, D.N. (2000). What is Beyond the Big Five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68(5), 821–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. London, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittenger, D. (1993). Measuring the MBTI… And Coming Up Short (http://www.indiana.edu/~jobtalk/HRMWebsite/hrm/articles/develop/mbti.pdf) Journal of Career Planning & Placement.

  • Robbins, S. (2003). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolland, J.P. (2002). Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of Personality. In McCrae, R.R. & Allik, J. (Eds), The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L.R. (1998). What Is Beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66(4), 495–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, C.N., Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions Across Cultures and Methods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(3), 304–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldz, S. & Vaillant, G.E. (1999). The Big Five Personality Traits and the Life Course: A 45-year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(2), 208–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, L. & Ross, J. (1964). An Assessment of Some Structural Properties of the Jungian Personality Typology. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(1), 62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.E., Satterwhite, R. & Saiz, J. (1998). The Importance of Psychological Traits: A Cross-Cultural Study. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. (1998). Born That Way: Genes, Personality and Behavior. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, K., Schmidt, F. & Ilies, R. (2002). Cross-Cultural Construct Validity of the Five Factor Model of Personality among Korean Employees. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halverson, C.B. (2008). Social Identity Group and Individual Behavior. In: Halverson, C.B., Tirmizi, S.A. (eds) Effective Multicultural Teams: Theory and Practice. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6957-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics