From material processes to elusive patterns, artists and scientists seek models of explanation (Kemp, 2000). Sometimes illusionally evocative, sometimes rigorously formulaic, and at other times sculpturally bounded, these conceptualizing tools have historically linked art and science. Bring to the fore new technologies, digitally driven, and a vast array of alternative schemes become possibilities. High resolution images of cells, scanned helical DNA structures and synaptic neural connections can presently be viewed in real time. Add to the mix embodied transgenic life forms and fabricated animal models, and our conceptualizing tools expand the possibilities for dimensional invention.
The accelerating dynamic between cultural and genetic evolution produces what can be termed a co-evolution between technical knowledge and living matter. And it is this co-evolution between technical expertise and animate matter we term technogenesis. 2 In other terms, technogenesis is the way in which the interactions between technology and biology impact our understanding of how nature exists, or would be, conceived and reconfigured in the future.
But how do art practices and the life sciences rely on the efficacy of images? And what part do these images play in the acquisition, comprehension, dissemination and even funding of visual or scientific study? In what ways do images reflect the socio/ economic and cultural conditions of producing knowledge? Located somewhere between illusion, proof and cognitive projection, images, hence, become critical fictions operating within the cultural imaginary. They often traverse contested territories situated elsewhere on the axis between fact and fiction. These visualizing models, ubiquitously employed by artists, scientists, designers, corporate advertisers, journalists and politicians, clarify, mislead, aggrandize, stimulate and document. In brief, they are representations embedded in social structures, policy decisions and commercial ventures. As aesthetic devices such images perform their semiotic function activating thought and emotion by their salient powers of communication and circumscribed belief (Anker, 2004).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, Brian (2003). Rapture: How Biotechnology Became the New Religion. New York: Basic Books.
Anker, Suzanne (1996). “Cellular Archeology,” Art Journal (Spring).
Anker, Suzanne (1997). “From Genesis to Gene,” paper delivered at ARC: The Society for the Arts, Religion and Contemporary Culture, NYC at the conference The Artist in/and Community: Millennial Visions.
Anker, Suzanne (2004). Excerpt from “Picture Perfect: From Golden Rules to Golden Boys”; keynote address, “The Image in Science”, sponsored by the Freie University in Berlin at the Hamburger Bahnof, December 13.
Anker, Suzanne, and Dorothy Nelkin (2004). The Molecular Gaze: Art in the Genetic Age. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Appelyard, Brian (1998). Brave New Worlds. New York: Viking.
Armenini, Giovam Battista (1989 [1587]). De’veri precetti della pictura, In David Freedberg (ed.), The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of Response. Chicago, IL/London: The University of Chicago Press.
BBC News (2001). “Gallery Puts DNA in the Frame,” September 19. Beard, Mark (2004). “Twisted Tale of Art, Death, DNA,” Wired (June).
Bowler, Peter J. (1986). Theories of Human Evolution: A Century of Debate, 1844-1944. Baltimore, MD/London: John Hopkins University Press.
Celent, Germano (2000). Marc Quinn. Catalogue published on occasion of the exhibition Marc Quinn at the Fondazione Prada in Milan, 5 May-10 June.
CNN (2004). “Is Anybody Out There?,” Sunday, August 8, 8:00PM.
Cook, Gareth (2000). “Cross Hare: Hop and Glow,” The Boston Globe, September 17, A01.
Coyne, Brendan (2004). “Anti-biotech Artist Indicted for Possessing ‘Harmless Bacteria’,” The New Scientist, July 6. http://newstandardnews.net (Accessed July 3, 2006).
de Duve, Christian (1984). A Guided Tour of the Living Cell. New York: Scientific American Books.
Eco, Umberto (1984). Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Edgerton, Samuel (1975). The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
Flusser, Villem (1988). “Curie’s Children”, Art Forum XXXVI, Nr.7, March 1988, p. 15; XXVI, Nr.10, Summer 1988, p. 18; and XXVII, Nr.2, October 1988, p. 2.
Frankel, Felice (2002). Envisioning Science: The Design and Craft of the Science Image. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freedberg, David (1989). The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of Response. Chicago, IL/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Fry, Northrup (1982). The Great Code. New York: Harcourt.
Kac, Eduardo (website). “Genesis,” http://www.ekac.org/geninfo.html.
Kac, Eduardo (website). “GFP Bunny,” online publication: http://www.ekac.org/gfpbunny.html.
Kac, Eduardo (2004). Interview with Edward A. Shanken, November 26, Oak Park, IL.
Kac, Eduardo (2005). Telephone interview with Edward A. Shanken, February 27.
Karafyllis, Nicole C. (ed.) (2003). Biofakte:Versuch uber Menschen zwischen Artefakt und Lebewesen. Paderborn, Germany: Mentis.
Kay, Lily (2000). Who Wrote The Book of Life: A History of the Genetic Code. California: Stanford University Press.
Kemp, Martin (2000). Visualizations: The Nature Book of Art and Science. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA: The University of California Press.
Kemp, Martin, and Marina Wallace (2000). Spectacular Bodies: The Art and Science of the Human Body from Leonardo da Vinci to Now. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kemper, Joanna (2004). “What a Headache.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.
Kevles, Bettyann (1998). Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century. Reading, MA: Perseus Books Group.
Kevles, Daniel, and Leroy Hood (eds.) (1992). The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Koerner, Lisbet (1999). Linnaeus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewontin, Richard (1992). “The Dream of the Human Genome,” New York Review of Books, 39(10), May 28.
Marks, Jonathan (2002). What It Means to be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People and their Genes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Mitchell, Syne (2002). Technogenesis. London: Roc.
Mitchell, William J.T. (2006). What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Nelkin, Dorothy, and Susan Lindee (2004). The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. Maryland: University of Maryland Press (originally published in 1996.).
Noble, David F. (1997). The Religion of Technology. New York: Penguin Books.
Nye, Robert A. (1976). “Heredity or Milieu: The Foundations of Modern European Criminological Theory,” Isis 67(3).
Ottinger, Didier (2004). “Eduardo Kac in Wonderland,” in Stephen Berg (trans.), Eduardo Kac (ed.), Rabbit Remix (exhibition catalog). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Laura Marsiaj Arte Contemporânea.
Petrullo, Lynn A. (2000). “The Church of DNA.” Paper delivered at CAA Conference, February 25.
Philipkoski, Kristen (2002). “RIP: Alba, the Glowing Bunny,” Wired News, August 12. Available online: http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,54399,00.html.
Princenthal, Nancy (2000). Review of “codeX: genome”, exhibition at Universal Concepts Unlimited, NYC, September.
Reichle, Ingeborg (2001). “Kunst und Genetik.” Zur Rezeption der Gentechnik in der zeitgenös-sischen Kunst. Die Philosophin. Forum für feministische Theorie und Philosophie, Heft 23, Jg. 12, Tübingen, S. 28-42.
Reichle, Ingeborg (2005). Kunst Aus Dem Labor: Zum Verhaltnis von Kunst und Wissenschaft im Zeitalter der Technoscience. New York/Wien: Springer.
Reodica, Julia (2004). “Un/Clean: Visualizing Im/Purity in Art and Science,” Art and Biotechnologies. Montreal, Canada: Presses de l’Universite.
Rojek, Chris (2001). Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books.
Serres, Michael (2004). Orlan: Carnal Art. Paris: Editions Flammerions.
Shanken, Edward (2004). “Art, Ethics, and Genetic Engineering: The Transgenic Art of Eduardo Kac,” In Dorothy Nelkin and Suzanne Anker (eds.), The Molecular Gaze: Art in the Genetic Age. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Shea, William R. (ed.) (2000). Science and the Visual Image in the Enlightenment. Canton, MA: Science History Publications.
Shlain, Leonard (1999). The Alphabet Versus the Goddess: The Conflict Between Word and Image. New York: Penguin.
Stafford, Barbara Maria, and Frances Terpak (2001). Devices of Wonder: From the World in A Box to Images on a Screen. Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Research Institute.
Staniszewski, Mary Anne (1995). Believing Is Seeing: Creating the Culture of Art. New York: Penguin Books.
Stepan, Nancy (1986). “Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science” Isis 77(2).
Sulston, John, and Georgia Ferry (2002). The Common Thread: A Story of Science, Politics, Ethics and the Human Genome. London: Bantam; National Portrait Gallery Press Release, 2001, “Mark Quinn and John Sulston Unveil Genomic Portrait”.
Symbiotica (2004). “Semi-Living Artist Performs in Bilbao, Spain.” April (Symbiotica press release). See http://www.symbiotica.uwa.edu.au/.
Van Dijck, Jose (1998). Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics. New York: New York University Press.
Walby, Catherine (2000). The Visible Human Project: Informic Bodies and Posthuman Medicine. London/New York: Routledge.
Weiss, Jeffrey, and Carol Mancusi-Ungaro (2000). Mark Rothko. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anker, S., Lindee, S., Shanken, E.A., Nelkin, D. (2008). Technogenesis: Aesthetic Dimensions of Art and Biotechnology. In: Lustig, B.A., Brody, B.A., McKenny, G.P. (eds) Altering Nature. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 97. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6921-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6921-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6920-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6921-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)