Skip to main content

Philosophical Approaches to Nature

  • Chapter
Book cover Altering Nature

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 97))

“Do we have the ethical resources to use our genetic powers wisely and humanely? … Do existing ethical theories, concepts, and principles provide the materials for constructing more adequate instruments for moral navigation?” These questions posed at the outset of From Chance to Choice go to the heart of the whole project upon which we are embarked. Its authors observe that “even if we were more assured than we should be that our technical control will be complete, we would continue to wonder whether we will be able to distinguish between what we can do and what we ought to do.” They resolve that “something more is needed. A systematic vision of the moral character of the world we hope to be moving toward is required” (Buchanan et al., 2000, 4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Agarwal, Bina (1998). “Environmental Management, Equity, and Ecofeminism: Debating India’s Experience,” Journal of Peasant Studies 25(4), 55-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleman, Philip, (ed.) (2001). Darwin: A Norton Critical Edition, 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1941). “Metaphysics,” In Richard McKeon (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House, 689-934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1985). Nicomachean Ethics, Terence Irwin (trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnhart, Larry (1998). Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, John (1961). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis (2000). New Organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, Jerome H., Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby (1992). The Adapted Mind. New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Barry, and David Edge (eds.) (1982). Science in Context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvoir, Simone de (1953). The Second Sex, H. M. Parshley (ed. and trans.) New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri (1907). L’Evolution Creatrice. Geneva, Switzerland: Skira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biology and Gender Study Group (1988). “The Importance of Feminist Critique for Contemporary Cell Biology,” Hypatia 3(1), 61-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, Ruth (1984). Science and Gender. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Richard (1984). “The Current Status of Scientific Realism,” In Jarrettt Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 41-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert (1664). Some Considerations Touching the Usefulness of Experimental Natural Philosophy. Oxford: H. Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert (1996). A Free Inquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature (orig. 1686). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, Robert (1981). “Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 12, 91-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, Michel (1988). Reasoning with the Infinite: From the Closed World to the Mathematical Universe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Theodore (1941). The Mechanical Philosophy and the ‘Animal Oeconomy.’ New York: Arno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler (2000). From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffon (1954). Œuvres philosophiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffon (1988). Des Epoques de la nature, In Jacques Roger (ed.), reprint. Paris: Museum d’histoire naturelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, Edwin A. (1949). Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. Baird (1982). “Hume’s Is/Ought Dichotomy and the Relation of Ecology to Leopold’s Land Ethic,” Environmental Ethics 4, 163-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. Baird (1994). Earth’s Insights: A Multicultural Survey of Ecological Ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian Outback. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. Baird, and Roger T. Ames (eds.) (1989). Nature in Asian Traditions of Thought: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1928). Die Logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1956). Meaning and Necessity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy (1999). The Dappled World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamber, Ephraim (1728). Cyclopaedia: Or an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences (first edition). London J. and J. Knapton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Robert (1994). Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Other Evolutionary Writings, facsimile of the first (1844) edition, In James A. Secord (ed.). Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chardin, Pierre Teilhard de (1956). La Phénomène Humaine. Completed 1926. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. Floris (1994). The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, Auguste (1998). Cours de philosophie positive, new ed. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranor, Carl, (ed.) (1994). Are Genes Us? New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, Richard E. (1995). “The ‘Is-Ought’ Controversy,” In Stanley Tweyman (ed.), David Hume: Critical Assessments, Vol. IV: Ethics, Passions, Sympathy, “Is” and “Ought”. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 517-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, Francis (1970). “The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology,” Nature 227 (8 August), 461-563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cskiszentmihalyi, Mark, and Philip J. Ivanhoe (eds.) (1998). Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi. New York: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Andrew, and Perry Williams (1993). “De-centring the ‘Big Picture’: The Origins of Modern Science and the Modern Origins of Science,” British Journal of the History of Science 26, 407-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Mary (1978). Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, Lindley, and Nancy Maull (1977). “Interfield Theories,” Philosophy of Science 41, 43-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles (1988). The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, Vol. 4, Frederick Burkhardt et al. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine (1988). Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard (1989). The Selfish Gene, new ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, Peter (ed.) (1995). The Scientific Enterprise in Early Modern Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deason, Gary (1986). “Reformation Theology and the Mechanistic Conception of Nature,” In David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers (eds.), God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter Between Christianity and Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 167-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René (1971). Descartes Dictionary, John Morris (trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René (1985). Philosophical Writings, 3 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John (1925). Experience and Nature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, Denis (1964). “D’Alembert’s Dream,” In Jacques Barzun and Ralph H. Bowen (trans.), Rameau’s Nephew and Other Works. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, Denis (1998). “Pensées philosophiques”, In P. Vernière (ed.), Oeuvres philosophiques, Paris: Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1961). The Mechanization of the World Picture. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeser, Marinus (1986). “Can the Dichotomy of Fact and Value Be Maintained?,” In Doeser and John Kraay (eds.), Facts and Values: Philosophical Reflections from Western and Non-Western Perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driesch, Hans (1908). The Science and Philosophy of the Organism. London: Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubos, René (1961). The Dreams of Reason: Science and Metaphysics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, John (1993). The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, John, and John Roberts (1999). “Ceteris Paribus. There Are No Provisos,” Synthese 118, 439-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, John, John Roberts, and Sheldon Smith (2002). “Ceteris Paribus Lost,” Erkenntnis 57, 281-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, John (1970). Facing Reality: Philosophical Adventures by a Brain Scientist. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Gerald (1987). Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrard, Jean (1994). L’Idée de Nature en France dans la première moitié du xviiie siècle, new ed. Paris: Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Ralph W. (1903). “Nature,” (orig. 1841), In The Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Vol. III. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 169-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshevsky, Marc (1998). “Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism,” Philosophy of Science 65, 103-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, Paul L. (1994). The Temptation of Evolutionary Ethics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne (1985). Myths of Gender. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favretti, Rema Rossini, Giorgio Sandri, and Roberto Scazzieri., (eds.) (1999). Incommensurability and Translation: Kuhnian Perspectives on Scientific Communication and Theory Change. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul (1962). “Explanation, Reductionism and Empiricism,” In Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space and Time. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. III. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Arthur (1984). “The Natural Ontological Attitude,” In Jarrett Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 83-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1966). Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, Bas van (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Philip (1949). Modern Science and Its Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, William (1939). “The Naturalistic Fallacy,” Mind (N.S.) 48, 464-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, William (1973). Ethics, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Michael (1999). Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, Ronald, and Alan Richardson, (eds) (1996). Origins of Logical Empiricism, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XVI. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Woman’s Development, reprint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillispie, Charles (1960). The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldmann, Lucien (1964). The Hidden God. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A. C. (trans.) (2001). Chuang-tzu: The Inner Chapters. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (“Chuang-tzu” is another romanization of “Zhuangzi.”)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Edward (1978). “Aristotelianism and the Longevity of the Medieval World View,” History of Science 16, 93-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Susan (1978). Women and Nature. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, Lori, and Dale Jamieson, (eds). (1994). Reflecting on Nature: Readings in Environmental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutting, Gary, (ed.) (1980). Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian (1975). The Emergence of Probability. London/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Mary Boas (1941). The Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Arno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Roger N. (1974). Twentieth Century Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Norwood Russell (1958). Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna (1978). “Animal Sociology and the Body Politic,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 4, 21-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna (1991). “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminist for the 1980s (orig. 1985), Socialist Review 8 (1985), 65-108; In Haraway (ed.), Simians, Cyborgs and Women, reprint. New York: Routledge, 149-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, Richard M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazard, Paul (1953). The European Mind: The Critical Years 1680-1715. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberger, Michael(online).“Naturphilosophie,” in von Edward Craig(ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at http://www.rep.routledge.com.

  • Held, Virginia (1996). “Whose Agenda? Ethics Versus Cognitive Science,” In Larry May, Marilyn Friedman, and Andy Clark (eds.), Mind and Morals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 69-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helden, Albert van (1997). “The Telescope in the Seventeenth Century,” In Peter Dear (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise in Early Modern Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 133-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, John (1986). “Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory,” History of Science 24, 335-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Thomas E., Jr. (1994). “Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving the Natural Environment,” In Lori Gruen and Dale Jamieson (eds.), Reflecting on Nature: Readings in Environmental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 98-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, Jack (2003). “A Gospel According to the Earth,” Harpers 307 (July), 41-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, Paul (ed.) (1993). World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hösle, Vittorio, and Christian Illies (eds.) (2005). Darwinism and Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Ruth, Mary Sue Henifin, and Marian Lowe (eds.) (1979). Women Look at Biology Looking at Women. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. D. (ed.) (1969). The Is/Ought Question. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, David (1972). “Reduction in Genetics - Biology or Philosophy?,” Philosophy of Science 39, 491-499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David (1888). Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David (1947). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David (1977). Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Keith (1983). “Supernaturalism and the Mechanical Philosophy,” History of Science 21, 297-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Keith (1997). “What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?,” In Peter Dear (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise in Early Modern Europe. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press, 86-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Thomas (1894). Evolution and Ethics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. (1991). “A Happy Symmetry: Xunzi’s Ethical Thought,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 59(2) (Summer), 309-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. (trans.) (2003). The Laozi or Daodejing. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Frank (1974). “Defining the Autonomy of Ethics,” Philosophical Review 83, 88-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, Alison M. (1983). Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, Nicholas (1996). “Naturphilosophie and the Kingdoms of Nature,” In Nicholas Jardine, James A. Secord, and Emma Spary (eds.), Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 230-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, Nicholas (1999). “Inner History; or, How to End Enlightenment,” In William Clark, Jan Golinski, and Simon Schaffer (eds.), The Sciences in Enlightened Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 477-494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1784). “An Answer to the Question, What is Enlightenment?” (1784), In Hans Reiss (ed.), Kant: Political Writings. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, pp. 54-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1786). “Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science”, In Immanuel Kant, Philosophy of Material Nature, James Ellington (trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, Part 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1956). Critique of Practical Reason, Lewis W. Beck (trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1964). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, H. J. Paton (trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1965). Critique of Pure Reason, Norman Kemp Smith (trans.). New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, Stuart (1993). The Origins of Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn F. (1983a). “The Force of the Pacemaker Concept in Theories of Cellular Slime Mold Aggregation,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 26, 515-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn F. (1983b). A Feeling for the Organism. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn F. (1994). “Master Molecules,” In Carl Cranor (ed.), Are Genes Us? New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 89-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn F. (2000). The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, Stephen R., and Edward O. Wilson (eds.) (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip (1984).“1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences,” Philosophical Review 93, 335-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip (1992). “The Naturalists Return,” Philosophical Review 101, 53-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, Paul, and Philip J. Ivanhoe (1996). Essays on Skepticism, Relativism and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline III, T. C., and Philip J. Ivanhoe (eds.) (2000). Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblock, John (trans.) (1988-1994). Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Vols. 1-3. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koertge, Noreta (ed.) (1998). A House Built on Sand. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, Christine (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhard (1985). Futures Past. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyre, Alexandre (1957). From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, Alexandre (1965). Newtonian Studies. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, Alexandre (1978). Galileo Studies. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas (1970). Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarck, Jean B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique. Paris: Chez Dantu et l’Auteur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarck, Jean B. (1991). “Nature,” In Julien-Joseph Virey (ed.), Nouveau dictionnaire d’histoire naturelle, 2nd ed. (1816-1819), in Jacques Roger and Goulven Laurent (eds), Lamarck: Articles d’histoire naturelle, reprint. Paris: Belin, pp. 307-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, Peter (1971). The World We Have Lost, 2nd ed. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. (trans.) (1970). Mencius. Harmondsworth, London: Penguin (“Mencius” is another romanization of “Mengzi.”).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. (trans.) (1979). The Analects. New York: Dorset (The most reliable source of the teach-ings of Kongzi or “Confucius”).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry (1966). “The Clock Metaphor and Probabilism: The Impact of Descartes on English Methodological Thought, 1650-65,” Annals of Science 22, 73-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry (1977). Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried W., and Samuel Clarke (2000). Correspondence. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiss, William (1972). The Domination of Nature. New York: Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, Aldo (1970). A Sand County Almanac, reprint. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplin, Jarrett (ed.) (1984). Scientific Realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. S. (1996). The Abolition of Man. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, David C., and Robert S. Westman (eds.) (1990). Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xiusheng, and Philip J. Ivanhoe (eds.) (2002). Essays on Mengzi’s Moral Philosophy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Elisabeth (1994). “Normality and Variation,” in Cranor (ed.), Are Genes Us?, pp. 99-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John (1975). Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, David, and Christopher Hamlin (eds.) (2006). Religion and the New Ecology: Environ mental Responsibility in a World of Flux. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, Jacques (1912). The Mechanistic Conception of Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, Helen E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, Helen E. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, Arthur (1927). “ ‘Nature’ as Aesthetic Norm,” Modern Language Notes, pp. 444-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, Arthur (1936). The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, James E. (1979). Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, James E. (1995). The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of Our Living Earth, reprint. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, Peter, Lindley Darden, and Carl Craver (2000). “Thinking about Mechanisms,” Philosophy of Science 67, 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair (1969). “Hume on ‘Is’ and ‘Ought,’ ” In W. D. Hudson (ed.), The Is/Ought Question. London: Macmillan, pp. 35-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair (1984). After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Inquiry. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, Jane, and Michael Ruse (eds.) (1999). Biology and the Foundation of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, Paolo (1996). Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Richard (1997). The God of Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. E. (1972). “Boyle’s Conception of Nature,” Journal of the History of Ideas 33, 523-542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menand, Louis (ed.) (1997). Pragmatism: A Reader. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Carolyn (1980). The Death of Nature. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, James (2001). Political Nature: Environmentalism and the Interpretation of Western Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, Mary (1995). Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature, rev. ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, Mary (2000). “Biotechnology and Monstrosity: Why We Should Pay Attention to the ‘Yuk’ Factor,” Hastings Center Report 30, 7-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, Mary (2003). “Criticizing the Cosmos,” In Willem B. Drees (ed.), Is Nature Ever Evil? London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millgram, Elijah (1995). “Was Hume a Humean?,” Hume Studies 21, 75-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millgram, Elijah (1997). “Hume on Practical Reasoning,” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 46, 235-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip, and Esther-Mirjam Sent (eds.) (2003). Science Bought and Sold. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Sandra (1995). “Function, Fitness, and Disposition,” Biology and Philosophy 10, 39-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Sandra (2004). Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George E. (1968). Principia Ethica, reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, Arne (1973). “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A Summary,” Inquiry 16, 95-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, Arne (1989). Ecology, Community and Lifestyles: Outlines of an Ecosophy, David Rothenberg (trans. and ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Ernest (1961). The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Jack (1996). “The Last Dogma of Empiricism?,” In Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson (eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 59-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, William (1998). “Alchemy, Domination, and Gender,” In Noreta Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 216-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac (1952). Opiticks. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac (1953). Newton’s Philosophy of Nature: Selections from his Writings, H. Standish Thayer (ed.). New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, Thomas (ed.) (2002). Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobis, Heribert (1967). “Frühneuzeitliche Verständnisweisen der Natur und ihr Wandel bis zum 18. Jahrhundert,” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 11, 37-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel (1984). Caring: A Feminist Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley, VA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. (1993). “Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach,” In Amartya Sen and Martha C. Nussbaum (eds.), The Quality of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 242-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, Susan Moller (1989). Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, Paul, and Hilary Putnam (1968). “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis,” In Herbert Feigl, Michael Scriven, and Grover Maxwell (eds.), Concepts, Theories and the Mind-Body Problem. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osler, Margaret (1994). Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, Susan (2000). The Ontogeny of Information, 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, Blaise (1941). Pensées and Provincial Letters. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Philip (1987). Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckham, Morse (2006). The Origin of Species: A Variorum Text. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgen, Charles (1989). “Logic and the Autonomy of Ethics,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67, 127-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, Alexander (1994). Essay on Man. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Roy (1986). “The Scientific Revolution: A Spoke in the Wheel?,” In Roy Porter and Mikulas Teich (eds.), Revolution in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 290-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, Arthur N. (1960). “The Autonomy of Ethics,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38, 199-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essay. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard van Orman (1980). “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” (orig. 1950), In Quine, From a Logical Point of View, 2nd, rev. ed., reprint. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 20-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, Abraham (1819). Cyclopedia, or Universal Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and Literature. Philadelphia, PA: Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans (1938). Experience and Prediction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reill, Peter Hanns (2005). Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Hans (ed.) (1970). Kant: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, Thomas (1983). The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restivo, Sal (1978). “Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: I - A Critical Reconnaissance,” Social Studies of Science 8, 143-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restivo, Sal (1982). “Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Easterm Mysticism: II - A Sociological Perspective on Parallelism,” Social Studies of Science 12, 37-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Robert (2002). The Romantic Conception of Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, Jacques (1997). Les Sciences de la vie dans la pensée française du xviiie siècle, 3rd ed. (Paris: Michel, 1997), partially translated as The Life Sciences in Eighteenth-Century French Thought, R. Ellrich (trans.) Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1991). “Solidarity or Objectivity?,” In Richard Rorty (ed.), Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosphical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander (1985). The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander (2000). Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Paolo (1968). Francis Bacon: From Magic to Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, Kenneth (1967). “Approaches to Reduction,” Philosophy of Science 34, 137-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm J. (1867). “Introduction to the Outlines of a System of Natural Philosophy,” T. Davidson (trans.), Journal of Speculative Philosophy 1, 194-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm J. (2004). First Outline to a System of the Philosophy of Nature, K. R. Peterson (trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, Moritz (1936). “Meaning and Verification,” Philosophical Review 45, 339-369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, Gerhard (1997). The Is-Ought Problem. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, James A. (2000). Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Lee, and Evelyn F. Keller (1970). “Slime Mold Aggregation Viewed as an Instability,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 26, 399-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby-Bigge, Lewis A. (ed.) (1897). British Moralists. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer (1985). Leviathan and the Air Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Lee M. (1997). Remaking Eden. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Rae (1992). “Environmental Factors Influencing Hormone Secretion,” In Jill Becker S. Marc Breedlove, and David Crews (eds.), Behavioral Endocrinology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 401-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter (1979). Practical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, Lawrence (2003). “Dappled Theories in a Uniform World,” Philosophy of Science 70, 424-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Phillip (1999). “From Natural Law to Evolutionary Ethics in Enlightenment French Natural History,” In Maienschein, and Ruse (eds.), Biology and the Foundations of Ethics, pp. 52-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Phillip (2001). “ ‘The Sense of Sublimity’: Darwin on Nature and Divinity,” Osiris 16, 251-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Phillip (2005). “ ‘It Might Be Called Reverence,’ ” In V. Hösle and C. Illies (eds.), Darwinism and Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 143-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Phillip (2007). “Kant and British Bioscience,” In P. Hunemmann (ed.), Understanding Purpose: Kant and the Philosophy of Biology. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, pp. 149-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott, and David Sloan Wilson (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soble, Alan (1998). “In Defense of Bacon,” in Noreta Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaemann, Robert (1967). “Genetisches zum Naturbegriff des 18. Jahrhunderts,” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 11, 59-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert (1896). First Principles, 4th ed. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, Robert (ed.) (1975). Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman-Jones, Sue (1998). “Fact/Value,” In Chris Jenks (ed.), Core Sociological Dichotomies. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 49-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, Carol (1992). The Mismeasure of Women. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (1989). Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, Paul (2004). “How We Dapple the World,” Philosophy of Science 71, 730-741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Keith (1971). Religion and the Decline of Magic. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Keith (1996). Man and the Natural World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoreau, Henry David (1992). Walden and Resistance to Civil Government, William Rossi (ed.), 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuana, Nancy (1990). “Re-fusing Nature-Nurture,” In Azizah Y al- Hibri and Margaret Simons, (eds.), Hypatia Reborn. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 70-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, Mary Evelyn, and John Berthrong (eds.) (1998). Confucianism and Ecology: The Interrelation of Heaven, Earth, and Humans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, G. J. (1967). Contemporary Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Anthony (1985). “Beyond Intrinsic Value: Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics,” Environmental Ethics 7, 321-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Karen (1990). “The Power and Promise of Ecological Feminism,” Environmental Ethics 12, 125-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Karen (ed.) (1997). Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Karen (2000). Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, C. Kenneth (1994). “Genes made Molecular,” Philosophy of Science 61, 163-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, C. Kenneth, Helen Longino, and Steven Kellert (2006). “The Pluralist Stance,” In Kenneth C. Waters, Helen Longino, and Steven Kellert (eds.), Scientific Pluralism. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. XIX. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1946). “Politics as a Vocation,” and “Science as a Vocation,” In Kurt Wolff (ed.), From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press, 77-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Steven (2001). Facing Up. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, Richard (1971). The Construction of Modern Science. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Jr., Lynn (1968). “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis,” In Machina ex Deo: Essays in the Dynamism of Western Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard A. O. (1978). Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Sussex, England: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard A. O. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Catherine (1995). The Invisible World: Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of the Microscope. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. (1978). On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. (1980). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. (1994). Naturalist. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. (1998). Consilience. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958). Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1999). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, Peter (1999). “The Case against Evolutionary Ethics Today,” In Maienschein and Ruse (eds.), Biology and the Foundation of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 276-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Larry (1976). Teleological Explanations. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Robert (1994). The Moral Animal. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammito, John (2002). Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammito, John (2004). A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zihlman, Adrienne (1981). “Women as Shapers of the Human Adaptation,” In Frances Dahlberg (ed.), Woman the Gatherer. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zammito, J.H., Ivanhoe, P.J., Longino, H., Sloan, P.R. (2008). Philosophical Approaches to Nature. In: Lustig, B.A., Brody, B.A., McKenny, G.P. (eds) Altering Nature. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 97. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6921-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics