Knowing Me, Knowing You – Profiling, Privacy and the Public Interest
There is nothing like predicting the future and the future might turn out to be nothing like we predict. Even so, it is a fair assumption that, as the twenty-first century unfolds, we will know a great deal more about ourselves but, equally, others will know a great deal more about us. To put to a broader use the evocative terms of contrast employed by Serge Gutwirth and Paul De Hert, we might say that in the foreseeable future, there will be rather more transparency and rather less opacity. When I say that there will be this shift from opacity to transparency, I mean not only that more raw data about ourselves and others will be available but that this data will translate into meaningful statements that impact our agency-based interests (particularly our interests in autonomy and privacy). Such is the prospect of profiling. A recurring theme of the essays in this book is that profiling promises benefits but, simultaneously represents various threats.
KeywordsPublic Interest Personal Information Crime Scene Privacy Interest Moral Choice
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allen, A. L., ‘Genetic Privacy: Emerging Concepts and Values’, in Rothstein, M.A,, (ed), Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- Archard, D., ‘The Value of Privacy’, in Claes, E., Duff, A, Gutwirth, S., (eds), Privacy and the Criminal Law, Antwerp and Oxford, Intersentia, 2006.Google Scholar
- Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R. Law as a Moral Judgment, London, Sweet and Maxwell, 1986 (reprinted Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994).Google Scholar
- Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R., Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
- Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R., Consent in the Law, Oxford, Hart, 2007.Google Scholar
- Bird, S., ‘Architect who Dressed as Tramp to Attack Girls Trapped by DNA’, The Times, June 15, 3, 2006.Google Scholar
- Brownsword, R., ‘Happy Families, Consenting Couples and Children with Dignity: Sex Selection and Saviour Siblings’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 17, No.4, Jordan & Sons Ltd., Bristol, 2005, pp. 435–473.Google Scholar
- Burgess, A., A Clockwork Orange, London, William Heinemann Ltd, 1962/2000.Google Scholar
- Eagleton, T., After Theory, London, Allen Lane, 2003.Google Scholar
- Friedewald, M., ‘Introduction to the SWAMI Project’, Friedewald and Wright (eds), Report on the Final Conference, Brussels, 21–22 March 2006, SWAMI Deliverable D5. A report of the SWAMI consortium to the European Commission under contract 006507, April 2006. Available at http://swami.jrc.es.
- Gauthier, D., Morals by Agreement, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
- Gewirth, A., Reason and Morality, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
- Gewirth, A., The Community of Rights, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
- Gutwirth, S. and De Hert, P., ‘Privacy, Data Protection and Law Enforcement. Opacity of the Individual and Transparency of Power’, in Claes, E., Duff, A. and Gutwirth, S. (eds), Privacy and the Criminal Law, Antwerp and Oxford, Intersentia, 2006.Google Scholar
- Koops, B.-J. and Leenes, R., ‘ ‘Code’ and the Slow Erosion of Privacy’, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 12, No.1, 2005, pp. 115–188.Google Scholar
- Laurie, G., Genetic Privacy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
- Lessig, L., Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York, Basic Books, 1999a.Google Scholar
- Norfolk, A., ‘Shoe Rapist is Trapped by Sister’s DNA 20 Years After Serial Attacks’, The Times, July 18, 3, 2006.Google Scholar
- Plato, The Republic, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1974.Google Scholar
- President’s Council on Bioethics, Beyond Therapy, Washington, Dana Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- Randerson, J., ‘Tighter Laws Needed on Sale of DNA Samples, Says Research Chief’, The Guardian, June 15, 3, 2006.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C., Laws of Fear, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
- Tadros, V., ‘Power and the Value of Privacy’, in Claes, E., Duff, A. and Gutwirth, S., (eds), Privacy and the Criminal Law, Antwerp and Oxford, Intersentia, 2006.Google Scholar
- Tien, L., ‘Architectural Regulation and the Evolution of Social Norms’, International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, Vol. 7, 2004.Google Scholar
- Toddington, S., Rationality, Social Action and Moral Judgment, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- Touraine, A., ‘The Crisis of ‘Progress’, in Bauer, M., (ed.), Resistance to New Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- Warren, S.D. and Brandeis, L.D., ‘The Right to Privacy’, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 4, No.5, 1890–1891, pp. 193–220. Available at: http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/6805/articles/privacy/Privacy_brand_warr2.html.
- Webster, B., ‘Cameras Set to Catch Side-Street Speeders’, The Times, June 15, 1–2, 2006.Google Scholar