Advertisement

Values and Ethics in Conservation

In this chapter, you will learn about:
  1. 1.

    Characteristics that distinguish major categories of value in conservation

     
  2. 2.

    Methods for determining economic values in conservation

     
  3. 3.

    Philosophical, cultural, and religious traditions that affirm instrumental and intrinsic values of species, biodiversity, and natural objects, and their engagement in the global conservation effort

     

In their book, Among the Elephants, Iain and Oria Douglas-Hamilton describe their study of the relationship of African elephants to acacia trees in Tanzania’s Manyara National Park (Douglas-Hamilton and Douglas- Hamilton 1975). The elephants were destroying the acacias in the park, and the Douglas-Hamilton’s job was to decide what course of action should be taken: reduce the size of the population by having some of the elephants killed or let the animals continue to destroy the acacias. Regarding the feelings of fellow scientists working in the Park, they wrote,

The very desire to preserve the animals was a subjective statement of faith in the animal’s intrinsic worth. It was a feeling possessed by most of the scientists there …, but they would not admit this sentiment into their arguments because it could not be backed up by facts; the right and wrong of aesthetics being imponderables not open to scientific analysis. (Douglas-Hamilton and Douglas-Hamilton 1975:75–76)

This kind of reasoning, not uncommon among conservation biologists, leads to serious internal conflict, as well as intellectual confusion and contradiction. One is expected to believe that elephants, sea turtles, African violets, or butterflies are intrinsically valuable and therefore worth preserving, and at the same time pretend that such values are not important in determining a conservation solution that will ensure the species’ preservation. Such thinking is selfdeception, a kind of “doublethink” George Orwell described in his novel, 1984, as “the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them” (Orwell 1962:176).

Keywords

Conservation Biology Religious Tradition Green Turtle Environmental Ethic Conservation Biologist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abuyuan, A. T. 2006. Faith-based organizations, international development agencies, and environmental management. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. Alliance of Religion and Conservation. 2006. Available from www.arcworld.org/news.asp?pageID=71 (accessed May 2007)
  3. A Rocha International. 2006. Available from www.arocha.org (accessed August 2006)
  4. Batchelor, M. 1992. Even the stones smile: selections from the scriptures. In: M. Batchelor and K. Brown (eds) Buddhism and ecology. Cassell, London, pp 2–17Google Scholar
  5. Bouma-Prediger, S. 1998. Creation care and character: the nature and necessity of ecological virtues. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 50:6–21Google Scholar
  6. Brockelman, W. 1987. Nature conservation. In: A. Arbhabhirama, D. Phantumvanit, J. Elkington, and P. Ingkasuman (eds) Thailand natural resources profile. Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok, pp 90–119Google Scholar
  7. Brungs, R. A., and M. Postiglione (eds). 1991. Some Christian and Jewish perspectives on the creation. Proceedings of the ITEST workshop March 15–17, 1991. Institute for Theological Encounter with Science and Technology, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  8. Buri, R. 1989. Wildlife in Thai culture. Culture and Environment in Thailand 22:51–59Google Scholar
  9. Callicott, J. B. 1986. On the intrinsic value of nonhuman species. In: B. G. Norton (ed) The preservation of species: the value of biological diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 138–172Google Scholar
  10. Callicott, J. B. 1994a. Conservation values and ethics. In: G. K. Meffe and C. Ronald Carroll (eds) Principles of conservation biology. 1994. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 24–49Google Scholar
  11. Callicott, J. B. 1994b. Earth’s insights: a survey of ecological ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian Outback. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Callicott, J. B. 1999a. Holistic environmental ethics and the problem of ecofacism. In: J. B. Callicott (ed) Beyond the land ethic: more essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp 59–76Google Scholar
  13. Callicott, J. B. 1999b. Do deconstructive ecology and sociobiology undermine the Leopold land ethic? In: J. B. Callicott (ed) Beyond the land ethic: more essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp 117–139Google Scholar
  14. Carson, R., N. E. Flores, and W. M. Hannemann. 1998. Sequencing and valuing public goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36:314–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapple, C. K. 2000. Introduction. In: C. K. Chapple and M. E. Tucker (eds) Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky, and water. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp xxxiii–xlixGoogle Scholar
  16. Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life. 1993. Available from www.coejl.org (accessed May 2007)
  17. Colinvaux, P. A. 1973. Introduction to ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Conservation International. 2007. Conservation and faith. Available from http://web.conservation.org/xp/CIWEB/programs/faith/ (accessed August 2007)
  19. Disch, R. (ed). 1970. The ecological conscience: values for survival. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. Douglas-Hamilton, I., and O. Douglas-Hamilton. 1975. Among the elephants. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Dustin, D. L., and L. H. McAvoy. 1982. The decline and fall of quality recreational environments. Environmental Ethics 4:48–55Google Scholar
  22. Dwivedi, O. P. 2000. Dharmic ecology. In: C. K. Chapple and M. E. Tucker (eds) Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky, and water. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 3–22Google Scholar
  23. Ehrenfeld, D. 1992. The business of conservation. Conservation Biology 6:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehrlich, P. R. 1971. How to be a survivor. Ballantine Books, Westminster, MDGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiedler, P. L, P. S. White, and R. L. Leidy. 1997. The paradigm shift in ecology and its implications for conservation. In: S. T. A. Pickett, M. Shachak, and G. E. Likens (eds) The ecological basis of conservation: heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 78–95Google Scholar
  26. Guenthner, D. 1995. To till it and to keep it: new models for congregational involvement with the land. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and The Land Stewardship Project, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  27. Hinckley, A. D. 1976. Applied ecology: a nontechnical approach. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Hope, M., and J. Young. 1994. Islam and ecology. Cross Currents 44(2):180–192Google Scholar
  29. Hunter, M. L., Jr. 1996. Fundamentals of conservation biology. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Islamic Foundation for Ecology and Environmental Sciences. www.ifees.org (accessed 24 May 2007)
  31. James, G. A. 2000. Ethical and religious dimensions of Chipko resistance. In: C. K. Chapple and M. E. Tucker (eds) Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky, and water. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 499–530Google Scholar
  32. Kabilsingh, C. 1990. Early Buddhist views on nature. In: A. Hunt-Badiner (ed) Dharma gaia. Parallax, Berkeley, CA, pp 34–53Google Scholar
  33. Kalupahana, D. J. 1987. The principles of Buddhist psychology. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaza, S. 1990. Towards a Buddhist environmental ethic. Buddhism at the Crossroads 1:22–25Google Scholar
  35. Kaza, S. 1993. Acting with compassion: Buddhism, feminism, and the environmental crisis. In: C. J. Adams (ed) Ecofeminism and the sacred. Continuum, New York, pp 50–69Google Scholar
  36. Kellert, S. R. 1985. American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: an update. In: M. Fox and L. Mickley (eds) Advances in animal welfare science. Humane Society of the United States, Washington, DC, pp 177–213Google Scholar
  37. Kellert, S. R. 1986. Social and perceptual factors in the preservation of animal species. In: B. G. Norton (ed) The preservation of species: the value of biological diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 50–73Google Scholar
  38. Kellert, S. R. 1989. Perception of animals in American culture. In: R. J. Hoage (ed) Perceptions of animals in American culture. Smithsonian, Washington, DC, pp 5–24Google Scholar
  39. Kellert, S. R. 1991. Japanese perceptions of wildlife. Conservation Biology 5:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelman, S. 1986. Cost–benefit analysis: an ethical critique. In: D. VanDeVeer and C. Pierce (eds) People, penguins, and plastic trees: basic issues in environmental ethics. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp 242–249Google Scholar
  41. Krebs, C. J. 1972. Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Krieger, M. H. 1973. What’s wrong with plastic trees? Science 179:446–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leopold, A. 1966. A Sand County Almanac with essays on conservation from Round River. Sierra Club/Ballantine Books. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewis, C. S. 1947. The abolition of man. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Manzoor, S. P. 1984. Environment and values: the Islamic perspective. In: Z. Sardar (ed) The touch of Midas: science, values, and environment in Islam and the West. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, pp 39–54Google Scholar
  46. Masri, A. B. A. 1992. Islam and ecology. In: F. Khalid and J. O’Brien (ed) Islam and ecology. Cassell, London, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  47. McHarg, I. 1969. Design with nature. Natural History Press, Garden City, NYGoogle Scholar
  48. Muir, J. 1916. A thousand mile walk to the Gulf. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Naess, A. 1986. Intrinsic value: will the defenders of nature please rise? In: M. E. Soule (ed) Conservation biology, the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 504–515Google Scholar
  50. Naess, A. 1989. Ecology, community, and lifestyle. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Norton, B. G. 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Orr, D. 2005. Armageddon versus extinction. Conservation Biology 19:290–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Orwell, G. 1962, 1984. New American Library of World Literature, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Porter, W. F., and H. B. Underwood. 1999. Of elephants and blind men: deer management in the U.S. national parks. Ecological Applications 9:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Randall, A. 1986. Human preference, economics, and the preservation of species. In: B. G. Norton (ed) The preservation of species: the value of biological diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 79–109Google Scholar
  56. Rao, K. L. S. 2000. The five great elements (Pañcamahābhūta): an ecological perspective. In: C. K. Chapple and M. E. Tucker (eds) Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky, and water. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 23–38Google Scholar
  57. Regan, D. H. 1986. Duties of preservation. In: B. G. Norton (ed) The preservation of species: the value of biological diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 195–220Google Scholar
  58. Rolston, H. III. 1986. Philosophy gone wild: essays in environmental ethics. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NYGoogle Scholar
  59. Sagoff, M. 2000. Environmental economics and the conflation of value and benefit. Environmental Science and Technology 34:1426–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schorsch, I. 1992. Learning to live with less: a Jewish perspective. In: S. C. Rockefeller and J. C. Elder (ed) Spirit and nature: why the environment is a religious issue. Beacon, Boston, MA, pp 25–38Google Scholar
  61. Shellenberger, M., and T. Nordhaus. 2004. The death of environmentalism: global warming politics in a post-environmental world. http:www.thebreakthrough.org (accessed May 2006)
  62. Shepard, P. Jr. 1978. Thinking animals. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Shiva, V. 1989. Staying alive: women, ecology, and development. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Shyamsundar, P., and R. A. Kramer. 1996. Tropical forest protection: an empirical analysis of the costs borne by local people. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, H. 1958. The religions of man. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Soulé, M. E. 1985. What is conservation biology? BioScience 35:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sponsel, L. E., and P. Natadecha-Sponsel. 1993. In: L. S. Hamilton (ed) Ethics, religion, and biodiversity: relations between conservation and cultural values. White Horse Press, Cambridge, pp 75–97Google Scholar
  68. Stuart, S. N. et al. 2005. Conservation theology for conservation biologists–a reply to David Orr. Conservation Biology 19:1689–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tribe, L. H. 1974. Ways not to think about plastic trees. Yale Law Journal 83:1315–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tzu Chi. 2006. www.tzuchi.org/global/services/environ.html (accessed May 2006)
  71. Van Houtan, K. 2006. Conservation as virtue: a scientific and social process for conservation ethics. Conservation Biology 20:1367–1372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walton, J. H. 2001. Genesis: the NIV application commentary. Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MIGoogle Scholar
  73. Wersal, L. 1995. Islam and environmental ethics: tradition responds to contemporary challenges. Zygon 30:451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. White, L. 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155:1203–1207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zaidi, I. H. 1991. On the ethics of man’s interactions with the environment: an Islamic approach. Environmental Ethics 3:35–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Personalised recommendations