Skip to main content

Do biodiversity patterns in Dutch wetland complexes relate to variation in urbanisation, intensity of agricultural land use or fragmentation?

  • Original Paper
  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biodiversity and Conservation in Europe

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 7))

Abstract

Red list species densities of birds (maximally 22 km−2), and angiosperms (maximally 39 km−2) were used as biodiversity indicators in 21 larger complexes of wetlands across the Netherlands. Their covariability with a range of indicators of human land use was assessed, including population, road and visitor density, area covered by agriculture, open water, forest and residential housing. Data were collected on the wetland complexes as well as for a perimeter with 10 km radius. In a principal components analysis (PCA) with all land use variables, it was found that the population-density-related complex of urbanisation, fragmentation (by roads), and intensity of fertilizer use together explained most of the variability present (i.e. the first PCA axis explained 50%), whilst land use within these complexes was second with an additional 19% and waterside recreation third with 12%. Red list bird species density did not correlate with that of angiosperms, nor with any of the indicators used. For the 13 complexes on organic peatland, we observed an increase in maximum red list angiosperm species density with the proportion of open marshland (P < 0.01, r > 0.55), which, in turn, was negatively and closely correlated with the first PCA axis reflecting an urbanisation gradient across the Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andelman SJ, Fagan WF (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:5954–5959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P et al (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barendregt A, Wassen MJ, Schot PP (1995) Hydrological systems beyond a nature reserve, the major problem in wetland conservation of Naardermeer (The Netherlands). Biol Conserv 72:393–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey SA, Haines-Young RH, Watkins RC (2002) Species presence in fragmented landscapes: modelling of species requirements at the national level. Biol Conserv 108:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker SA, Van den Berg NJ, Speleers BP (1994) Vegetation transitions of floating wetlands in a complex of turbaries between 1937 and 1989 as determined from aerial photographs with GIS. Vegetatio 114:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltman B, Van den Broek T, Bloemen S, Witsel C (1996) Effects of restoration measures on nutrient availability in a formerly nutrient poor floating fen after acidification and eutropication. Biol Conserv 62:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist MM, Vos P, Klinkhamer PGL, Ter Keurs WJ (2003) Declining plant species richness of grassland ditch banks – a problem of colonisation or extinction? Biol Conserv 109:391–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander L, Vermaat JE, Florax RJGM (2006). The empirics of wetland valuation, a meta-analysis. Envn Resour Econ 33:223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brose U (2001) Relative importance of isolation, area and habitat heterogeneity for vascular plant species richness of temporary wetlands in east-German farmland. Ecography 24:722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBS (2000) Bestand bodemgebruik/Netherlands digital land use map. Netherlands Statistics Service, Voorburg

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS (2005) Statline, online data depository. Netherlands Statistics Service. www.cbs.nl. Accessed in August 2005

  • Cornwell WK, Grubb PJ (2003) Regional and local patterns in plant species richness with respect to resource availability. Oikos 100:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson AJP, Rodrigue JP, Roberts WM, Wilcove DS (1997) Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275:550–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP (2000) Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 14:314–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graveland J (1998) Reed die-back, water level management and the decline of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in The Netherlands. Ardea 86:187–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein L, De Groot R, Van Ierland E (2005) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. In: Hein L, Optimizing the management of complex dynamic ecosystems, an ecological-economic modelling approach, Thesis Wageningen University, pp 73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough RE, Fornwall HD, Negele BJ et al (1989) Plant community dynamics in a chain of lakes, principal factors in the decline of rooted macrophytes with eutrophication. Hydrobiologia 173:199–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrene M et al (2004) Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18:667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamers LPM, Smolders AJP, Roelofs JGM (2002) The restoration of fens in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 478:107–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller TR, Rørdam CP (1985) Species number of vascular plants in relation to area, isolation and age of ponds in Denmark. Oikos 45:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natuurloket (2004) Natuurloket, online biomonitoring data depository, www.natuurloket.nl, accessed in November 2004

  • Ozinga WA, Schaminée JHJ, Bekker RM et al (2005) Predictability of plant species composition from environmental conditions is constrained by dispersal limitation. Oikos 108:555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellet J, Guisan A, Perrin N (2004) A concentric analysis of the impact of urbanisation on the threatened European tree frog in an agricultural landscape. Conserv Biol 18:1599–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips GL, Eminson DF, Moss B (1978) A mechanism to account for macrophyte decline in progressively eutrophicated waters. Aquat Bot 4:103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soons MB, Messelink JH, Jongejans E, Heil GW (2005) Habitat fragmentation reduces grassland connectivity for both short-distance and long-distance wind-dispersed forbs. J Ecol 93:1214–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Molen DT, Portielje R (1999). Multi-lake studies in The Netherlands, trends in eutrophication. Hydrobiologia 408/409:359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Diggelen R, Molenaar WJ, Kooijman AM (1996) Vegetation succession in a floating mire in relation to management. J Veg Sci 7:809–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verboom J, Foppen R, Chardon P et al (2001) Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds. Biol Conserv 100:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vereniging Natuurmonumenten (1998) Omkijken naar laagveen. Resultaten van beheer en wensen voor de toekomst van de laagvenen van Natuurmonumenten. ‘s-Graveland, 84 pp (in Dutch, policy document on the management of Dutch fenlands)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven JTA (ed) (1992) Fens and bogs in The Netherlands, vegetation, history, nutrient dynamics and conservation. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Geobotany 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermaat JE, De Bruyne RJ (1993) Factors limiting the distribution of submerged waterplants in the lowland river Vecht (The Netherlands). Freshw Biol 30:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Chardon JP (1998) Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis. J Appl Ecol 35:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BD (1988) Species richness, species rarity and conservation evaluation of rich-fen vegetation in lowland England and Wales. J Appl Ecol 25:331–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan E. Vermaat .

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vermaat, J.E., Goosen, H., Omtzigt, N. (2006). Do biodiversity patterns in Dutch wetland complexes relate to variation in urbanisation, intensity of agricultural land use or fragmentation?. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Biodiversity and Conservation in Europe. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6865-2_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics