The Karelian Regional Seismic Network in NW Russia

  • Tatiana Matveeva
  • Yury V. Fedorenko
  • Eystein S. Husebye
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (NAIV, volume 81)

NW Russia is an aseismic region implying that few and infrequent earthquakes occur. Its seismicity is mainly mapped through analysis of historic macroseismic observations which is incomplete regarding small earthquakes say below ML = 4.5. For the Karelia Region (north of St. Petersburg) most located seismic events are explosions in origin and further more recorded mainly by stations and arrays adjacent to Karelia that is in Kola, Finland and N. Norway. From a Karelian point of view this is not entirely satisfactorily so some initiative has been taken for installing a local seismograph network. Note that deployment and subsequent network operations are a costly undertakings but using the inexpensive and versatile Cossack Ranger II instrumentation a high quality and affordable network operation for Karelia has been achieved. These efforts are the topic of this article.


Karelia NW Russia seismograph network Cossack Ranger II earthquake monitoring 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chernouss, P., Zuzin, Yu., Mokrov, E., Fedorenko, Yu.V., Kalabin, G., Husebye, E. S., 1999. Avalanche Hazards in Khibiny Massif, KOLA, and the new Nansen Seismograph Station. IRIS Newsletter 1, 12–13.Google Scholar
  2. Fedorenko, Yu. V., Husebye, E. S., Bulaenko, E., 2000. School Yard Seismology. Orfeus Newsletter 2, 3, 22.Google Scholar
  3. Fedorenko, Y.V., Matveeva, T, Beketova, E.B., Husebye, E.S., 2008a. Secondary phase validation - phase classification by polarization. M/s submitted Physics Earth Planetary Interiors.Google Scholar
  4. Fedorenko, Y.V., Husebye, E.S., and Matveeva, T., 2008b. A 2-D Seismic Signal Detector for Stand Alone 3-Component Stations. In E.S. Husebye (ed.) Earthquake Monitoring and Seismic Hazard in Balkan Countries. Springer Publishing, Berlin, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fedorenko, Y.V., Husebye, E.S., Matveeva, T., 2008c. Cossack Ranger II–A High Quality, Versatile and Affordable 3-Component Short-Period Station. In E.S. Husebye (ed.) Earthquake Monitoring and Seismic Hazard in Balkan Countries. Springer Publishing, Berlin, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Husebye, E.S., Beketova, E.B., Fedorenko, Y.V., 2003. School Yard Seismology. J. Geoscience Education 51, 329–355.Google Scholar
  7. Husebye, E.S., Mäntyniemi, P., 2007. The Kaliningrad, West Russia earthquake on the 21st of September–surprise events in a very low-seismicity area. Physics Earth Planetary Interiors 153, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Katkalov, Yu., Husebye, E.S., 2008. Cossack Ranger field operation–efficient data transfer via mobile phones. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  9. Sharov, N.V., (ed.), 2004. Deep structure and seismicity of the Karelia region and its margins. Karelian Research Center, Institute of Geology, Petrozavodsk, Russia, pp 245–255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana Matveeva
    • 1
  • Yury V. Fedorenko
    • 2
  • Eystein S. Husebye
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of GeologyKarSC RASRussia
  2. 2.Polar Geophysical InstituteKSC RASRussia
  3. 3.Bergen Center for Computational ScienceUNIFOB A/S, University of BergenNorway

Personalised recommendations