Skip to main content

NGO Approaches to Minimizing the Impacts of Aquaculture: A Review

  • Chapter
Aquaculture in the Ecosystem

The rapid growth of the aquaculture industry and its associated environmental and social impacts have brought aquaculture to the forefront of debates about the long term viability of global food production systems. Environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are involved in aquaculture from the point of view of environmental sustainability at the local farm level, the larger ecosystem level, and the level of international trade. NGOs are driven by their missions, which may be focused on conserving nature and biodiversity, protecting the marine environment, improving the quality of food, or creating a sustainable society. NGO concerns with aquaculture are related to their missions and are often derived from related conservation themes such as agriculture, fisheries, or other marine or freshwater issues or develop out of specific local concerns of their communities. NGO activities range from research, information distribution and training to local organization, lobbying for legislative change, and partnering with industry to minimize impacts. Increasingly, the aquaculture industry is recognizing the diversity of NGOs and that each organization addresses aquaculture's impacts through a unique combination of approaches. This chapter discusses a variety of specific approaches used by NGOs to influence the aquaculture industry including encouraging the use of better management practices, educating consumers, and developing standards, with WWF-US as a specific example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Black KD, Cook EJ, Jones KJ, Kelly MS, Leakey RJ, Nickell TD, Sayer MDJ, Tett P, Willis K (2002) Review and synthesis of the environmental impacts of aquaculture. Report for the Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CE, McNevin AA, Clay J Johnson HM (2005) Certification issues for some common aquaculture species. Reviews in Fisheries Science 13:231–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgespan Group (2005) Seafood choices initiative evaluation. Prepared for the David & Lucile Packard Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay J (2004) World Agriculture and the Environment: a commodity-by-commodity guide to impacts and practices. World Wildlife Fund and Island Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker W (2007) Eel stocks dangerously close to collapse. ICES Article. Downloaded from http://www.ices.dk/marineworld/eel.asp May 28, 2007.

  • Esmark M, Stensland S, Synnove Lilleeng M (2005) On the run—escaped farmed fish in Norwegian waters. WWF-Norway, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransen T (2005) The economic and environmental case against farming marginal land in commercial agriculture operations. In: Clay J, Rajbhandari B (eds), Agriculture and the Environment Volume II, Thematic Issues: A WWF Handbook on Agriculture Policies and Issues. World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2004) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2004. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2007a) The State of World Fisheries and Aquacutlure 2006. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2007b) FISHSTAT Plus. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Fisheries Aquaculture Information and Statistics Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LP, Fiske P, Holm M, Jensen AJ, og Sægrov H (2006) Bestandsstatus for laks. Rapport fra arbeidsgruppe. Utredning for DN 2006–3:48 sider.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES (2006) Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management., Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment and Advisory Committee on Ecosystems, 2006. ICES Advice Books 1–10:6, 310 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HM (2005) Annual Report on the United States Seafood Industry, Thirteenth Edition. H.M. Johnson & Associates, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konefal J (2006) Protecting the Oceans and Marine Life via the Market and Consumption: The Sustainable Seafood Movement. Submitted for the Sustainable Consumption and Society Conference, Univ. Wisconsin, 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor R, Goldburg R, Primavera J, Kautsky N, Beveridge M, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017–1024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor R, Burke M (2005) Aquaculture and Ocean Resources: Raising Tigers of the Sea. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:185–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, L, Whitney J, Bonine K, Schmelz K, Ritchlin J, Rothenbush T, Wahlberg L (2005) Closing in on Environmentally Sound Salmon Aquaculture: a fresh look at the economics of closed tank systems. Produced for the Coastal Alliance of Aquaculture Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto F, Kremerman M (2005) Cultivando Pobreza: Condiciones laborales en la salmonicultura. Fundación Terram, Santiago, Registro de Problemas Públicos 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter G (2003) Protecting Wild Atlantic Salmon from Impacts of Salmon Aquaculture:A Country-by-country Progress Report. World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC and Atlantic Salmon Federation, St. Andrews, NB Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckes E (2003) World fish trade demand forecasts and regulatory framework. In: FAO (2004) Report of the Expert Consultation on International Fish Trade, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3–5 December 2003. FAO Fisheries Report. No. 744. Rome, FAO, pp 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway S, Davis C, Downey R, Karney R, Kraeuter J, Parsons J, Rheault R, Wikfors G (2003) Shellfish aquaculture—in praise of sustainable economies and environments. World Aquaculture 34(4):15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacon GJ (2005) State of information on salmon aquaculture feed and the environment. WWF report, New York, pp 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudela S, García R (2004) Tuna farming in the Mediterranean: the bluefin tuna stock at stake. World Wide Fund for Nature, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, NACA, WWF, FAO (2002) Shrimp Farming and the Environment, A World Bank, NACA, WWF and FAO Consortium Program: To analyze and share experiences on the better management of shrimp aquaculture in coastal areas. Synthesis report. Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute, IUCN-The World Conservation Union, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in consultation with the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (1992) Global Biodiversity Strategy: Guidelines for action to save, study and use Earth’s biotic wealth sustainably and equitably. WRI, IUCN, and UNEP, 260 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bostick, K. (2008). NGO Approaches to Minimizing the Impacts of Aquaculture: A Review. In: Holmer, M., Black, K., Duarte, C.M., Marbà, N., Karakassis, I. (eds) Aquaculture in the Ecosystem. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6810-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics