Patterns of Embryonic Development in Early to Middle Devonian Ammonoids

  • Susan M. Klofak
  • Neil H. Landman
  • Royal H. Mapes

The basic structure of the ammonitella or embryonic shell of the Ammonoidea has been well documented (Sandberger, 1851; Branco, 1879–1880, 1880–1881; Schindewolf, 1933; Erben, 1960). The ammonitella begins with a small egg-shaped or spherical initial chamber (=protoconch) (for discussion of terms see Schindewolf, 1933; House, 1996; and Landman et al., 1996; see Landman et al., 1996 for additional references) and extends as a straight shaft or coiled tube (called the ammonitella coil by House, 1996: 168). In most species the ammonitella extends approximately one whorl ending in a primary constriction (Landman et al., 1996; Klofak et al., 1999). Internally, the siphuncle originates in the initial chamber as a rounded caecum and is attached to the shell wall by a prosiphon (Landman, 1988: Figs. 1, 2 and Klofak et al., 1999: Figs. 1, 2).

Keywords

Permian Quartz Cretaceous Jurassic Perforation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, J. M., N. H. Landman, and H. Mutvei. 1987. Development of the embryonic shell of Nautilus. In W. B. Saunders, and N. H. Landman (editors), Nautilus–the Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil, pp. 373–400. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bandel, K. 1982. Morphologie und Bildung der früh ontogenetischen Gehäuse bei conchiferen Mollusken. Facies 7: 1–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandel, K. 1986. The ammonitella: a model of formation with the aid of the embryonic shell of archaeogastropods. Lethaia 19: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrande, J. 1865. Systême Silurien du centre de la Bohême. I. Vol. II. Céphalopodes. Praha and Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, R. T., and M. R. House. 1994. International Devonian goniatite zonation, Emsian to Givetian, with new records from Morocco. Courier Forschungs-institut Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main 169: 79–135.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, R. T., and J. Kullmann. 1996. Paleozoic ammonoids in space and time. In N. H. Landman, K. Tanabe, and R. A. Davis (editors), Ammonoid Paleobiology, pp. 711–753. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bensaïd, M. 1974. Étude sur des Goniatites à la limite du Dévonien moyen et supérieur du Sud marocain. Notes du Service Géologique du Maroc 36(264): 81–140.Google Scholar
  8. Berthold, T., and T. Engeser. 1987. Phylogenetic analysis and systematization of the Cephalopoda (Mollusca). Verhandlungen Naturwissenscaftlichen vereins in Hamburg (NF) 29: 187–220.Google Scholar
  9. Branco, W. 1879–80. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der fossilen Cephalopoden, Theile I. Palaeontographica 26: 19–50, pls. 4–13.Google Scholar
  10. Branco, W. 1880–81. Beiträge zur Entwicklungensgeschichte der fossilen Cephalopoden, Theile II. Palaeontographica 27: 17–81, pls. 3–17.Google Scholar
  11. Bogoslovsky, B. I. 1969. Devonskie Ammonoidei. I. Agoniatity. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Institita Akademiya Nauk SSSR 124: 341pp.Google Scholar
  12. Bucher, H., N. H. Landman, S. M. Klofak, and J. Guex. 1996. Modes and rate of growth in ammonoids. In N. H. Landman, K. Tanabe, and R. A. Davis (editors), Ammonoid Paleobiology, pp. 407–461. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bucher, H., R. Chirat, and J. Guex. 2003. Morphogenetic origin of radial lirae and mode of shell growth in Calliphylloceras (Jurassic Ammonoidea). Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae 96: 495–502.Google Scholar
  14. Checa, A. 1995. A model for the morphogenesis of ribs in ammonites inferred from associated microsculptures. Palaeontology 37: 863–888.Google Scholar
  15. Chirat, R., and S. v. Boletzky. 2003. Morphogenetic significance of the conchal furrow in nautiloids: evidence from early embryonic shell development of Jurassic Nautilida. Lethaia 36: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chlupácˇ, I., and V. Turek. 1983. Devonian goniatites from the Barrandian area, Czechoslovakia. Edice Rozpravy Ustrední_hoústavu geologického, svazek 46: 159pp. [Translated by I. Chlupácˇand H. Zárubová].Google Scholar
  17. Clarke, J. M. 1899. Notes on the early stages of certain goniatites. Annual Report of the New York State Geologist 16 (Annual Report of the New York State Museum) 50(2): 163–169.Google Scholar
  18. Clausen, C. D. 1969. Oberdevonische Cephalopoden aus dem Rheinischen Schiefergebirge, II Gephuroceratidae, Beloceratidae. Palaeontographica Abteilungen A 132: 95–178.Google Scholar
  19. Doguzhaeva, L. A. 1996a. Microstructure of juvenile shells of the Permian Hemibactrites sp. (Cephalopoda: Bactritoidea). Doklady Biological Sciences 349(2): 275–279.Google Scholar
  20. Doguzhaeva, L. A. 1996b. Shell ultrastructure of the early Permian bactritella and ammonitella, and its phylogenetic implication. Jost Wiedmann Symposium. Cretaceous Stratigraphy, Paleobiogeology and Paleobiogeography Abstracts, pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
  21. Doguzhaeva, L. A. 2002. Adolescent bactritoid, orthoceroid, ammonoid and coleoid shells from the upper Carboniferous and lower Permian of the South Urals. In H. Summesberger, K. Histon, and A. Daurer (editors), Cephalopods–Present and Past. Abhandlungen Geologische Bundesanstalt 57: 9–55.Google Scholar
  22. Drushschits, V. V., L. A. Doguzhayeva, and I. A. Mikhaylova. 1977. The structure of the ammonitella and the direct development of ammonites. Paleontological Journal 2: 57–69.Google Scholar
  23. Engeser, T. 1990. Major events in cephalopod evolution. In P. D. Taylor, and G. P. Larwood (editors), Major Evolutionary Radiations. Systematics Association Special Volume 42: 119–138, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Engeser, T. 1996. The position of the Ammonoidea within the Cephalopoda. In N. H. Landman, K. Tanabe, and R. A. Davis (editors), Ammonoid Paleobiology, pp. 3–19. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Erben, H. K. 1950. Bemerkungen zu Anomalien mancher Anfangswindungen von Mimagoniatites fecundus (Barr.) Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monathefte, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
  26. Erben, H. K. 1953. Goniatitacea (Ceph.) aus dem Unterdevon und Unterem Mitteldevon. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 98: 175–225.Google Scholar
  27. Erben, H. K. 1960. Primitive Ammonoidea aus dem Unterdevon Frankreichs und Deutschlands. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 110(1): 1–128.Google Scholar
  28. Erben, H. K. 1962. Über böhmische und türkische Vertreter von Anetoceras (Ammon., Unterdevon). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 36(1/2): 14–27.Google Scholar
  29. Erben, H. K. 1964a. Bactritoidea. In R. C. Moore (editor), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part K, Mollusca 4, Cephalopoda: K491–505. Lawrence, Kansas, and New York: The University of Kansas Press and the Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
  30. Erben, H. K. 1964b. Die Evolution der ältesten Ammonoidea, Lieferung 1. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, Paläontologie Abhandlungen 120(2): 107–212.Google Scholar
  31. Erben, H. K. 1965. Die Evolution der ältesten Ammonoidea (Lieferung II). Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie Paläontologie Abhandlungen 122(3): 275–313.Google Scholar
  32. Erben, H. K. 1966. Über den Ursprung der Ammonoidea. Biological Review 41: 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Erben, H. K., G. Flajs, and A. Siehl 1968. Ammonoids: early ontogeny of ultramicroscopical shell structure. Nature 219(5152): 396–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Göddertz, B. 1987. Devonische Goniatiten aus SW-Algerien und ihre stratigraphische Einordnung in die conodonten-Abfolge. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 197: 127–220.Google Scholar
  35. Göddertz, B. 1989. Unterdevonische Hercynische Goniatiten aus Deutschland, Frankreich und der Türkei. Palaeontographica Abteilungen A 208(1–3): 61–89.Google Scholar
  36. House, M. R. 1962. Observations on the ammonoid succession of the North American Devonian. Journal of Paleontology 36(2): 247–284.Google Scholar
  37. House, M. R. 1965. A Study on the Tornoceratidae: the succession of Tornoceras and related genera in the North American Devonian. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Series B 250: 79–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. House, M. R. 1981. On the origin, classification and evolution of the early Ammonoidea. In. M. R. House, and J. R. Senior (editors), The Ammonoidea. Systematic Association Special Volume 18: 3–36, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. House, M. R. 1996. Juvenile goniatite survival strategies following Devonian extinction events. In M. B. Hart (editor), Biotic Recovery from Mass Extinction Events. Geological Society Special Publication 102: 163–185.Google Scholar
  40. Hyatt, A. 1883. Fossil cephalopods in the Museum of Comparative Zoology. American Association for the Advancement of Science Proceedings 32: 323–361.Google Scholar
  41. Jacobs, D. K., and N. H. Landman. 1993. Nautilus–a poor model for the function and behavior of ammonoids? Lethaia 26: 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klofak, S. M., N. H. Landman, and R. H. Mapes. 1999. Embryonic development of primitive ammonoids and the monophyly of the Ammonoidea. In F. Oloriz, and F. J. Rodriguez-Tovar (editors), Advancing Research on Living and Fossil Cephalopods, pp. 23–45. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  43. Klug, C. 2001. Early Emsian ammonoids from the eastern Anti-Atlas (Morocco) and their succession. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 74(4): 479–515.Google Scholar
  44. Klug, C., D. Korn, and A. Reisdorf. 2000. Ammonoid and conodont stratigraphy of the late Emsian to early Eifelian (Devonian) at the Jebel Ouaoufilal (near Taouz, Tafilalt, Morocco). Travaux de l’Institut Scientifique, Rabat, Série Géologie et Géographie Physique 20: 45–56.Google Scholar
  45. Korn, D. 2001. Morphometric evolution and phylogeny of Palaeozoic ammonoids. Early and Middle Devonian. Acta Geologica Polonica 5(3): 193–215.Google Scholar
  46. Korn D., and C. Klug. 2002. Ammoneae Devonicae. In W. Riegraf (editor), Fossilium Catalogus 1: Animalia 138: 1–375, Leiden: Backhuys.Google Scholar
  47. Kulicki, C. 1974. Remarks on the embryogeny and postembryonal development of ammonites. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 19(2): 201–224.Google Scholar
  48. Kulicki, C. 1979. The ammonite shell: its structure, development and biological significance. Palaeontologia Polonica 39: 96–141.Google Scholar
  49. Landman, N. H. 1988. Heterochrony in ammonites. In M. L. McKinney (editor), Heterochrony in Evolution, pp. 159–182. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  50. Landman, N. H., K. Tanabe, and Y. Shigeta. 1996. Ammonoid embryonic development. In N. H. Landman, K. Tanabe, and R. A. Davis (editors), Ammonoid Paleobiology, pp. 343–405. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
  51. Landman, N. H., F. Bizzarini, K. Tanabe, R. H. Mapes, and C. Kulicki. 2001. Micro-ornament on the embryonic shells of Triassic ceratites (Ammonoidea). American Malacological Bulletin 16(1/2): 1–12.Google Scholar
  52. Mapes, R. H. 1979. Carboniferous and Permian Bactritoidea (Cephalopoda) in North America. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Article 64: 1–75.Google Scholar
  53. Miller, A. K. 1938. Devonian ammonoids of America. Geological Society of America Special Papers Number 14: 262pp.Google Scholar
  54. Miller, A. K., and W. M. Furnish. 1954. The classification of the Paleozoic ammonoids. Journal of Paleontology 28(5): 685–692.Google Scholar
  55. Owen, C. B. 1878. On the relative positions to their constructors of the chambered shells of Cephalopods. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1878: 955–975.Google Scholar
  56. Petter, G. 1959. Goniatites Dévoniennes du Sahara. Publications du Service de la Carte Géologique de l’Algérie (Nouvelle Séries) Paléontologie Mémoire 2: 313pp.Google Scholar
  57. Ristedt, H., 1968. Zur Revision der Orthoceratidae. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1968: 211–287.Google Scholar
  58. Ruzhentsev, V. E. 1960. Printsipy sistematiki, sistema i filogeniya paleozoyskikh ammonoidey. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademiya Nauk SSSR 83: 331pp. [Principles of systematics, classification and phylogeny of Paleozoic ammonoids].Google Scholar
  59. Ruzhentsev, V. E. 1974. Suborder Ammonoidea; general section. In V. E. Ruzhentsev (editor), Fundamentals of Paleontology, Mollusca-Cephalopoda I 5: 371–503. Jerusalem: Kater Publishing House. [Translated by Israel Program for Scientific Translation].Google Scholar
  60. Sandberger, G. 1851. Beobachtungen über mehrere schwierige Puncte der Organisation der Goniatiten. Jahrbücher des Vereins für Naturkunde im Herzogthum Nassau 7: 292–304.Google Scholar
  61. Schimansky, V. N. 1954. Pryamye nautiloidei i baktritoidei sakmarskogo artinskogo yarusov Yuzhnogo Urala (Straight nautiloids and bactritoids from the Sakmarian and Artinskian stages of the southern Urals). Trudy Paleontologicheskii Institut Akademiia Nauk SSSR 44: 1–156.Google Scholar
  62. Schindewolf, O. H. 1933. Vergleichende Morphologie und Phylogenie der Anfangskammern tetrabrachiater Cephalopoden–eine Studie über Herkunft, Stammesentwicklung und System der niederen Ammonoideen. Abhandlungen preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Berlin. Neue folge 148: 1–115.Google Scholar
  63. Sprey, A. 2002. Tuberculate micro-ornament on the juvenile shell of Middle Jurassic ammonoids. Lethaia 34: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tanabe, K. 1989. Endocochliate embryo model in the Mesozoic Ammonitida. Historical Biology 2: 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tanabe, K., N. H. Landman, and R. H. Mapes. 1994. Early shell features of some Late Paleozoic ammonoids and their systematic implications. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series 173: 384–400.Google Scholar
  66. Tanabe, K., J. Tsukahara, Y. Fukuda, and Y. Fukada. 1991. Histology of a living Nautilus embryo: preliminary observations. Journal of Cephalopod Biology 2(1): 13–22.Google Scholar
  67. Vermeij, G. J. 1993. A Natural History of Sea Shells. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wissner, U. F. G., and A. W. Norris. 1991. Middle Devonian goniatites from the Dunedin and Besa River Formations of Northeastern British Columbia. Contributions to Paleontology, Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 412: 45–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan M. Klofak
    • 1
  • Neil H. Landman
    • 1
  • Royal H. Mapes
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Paleontology (Invertebrates)American Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geological SciencesOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations