Advertisement

Evaluation of Exotic Parasitoids and Predators in Field Cages in California

  • Kim Hoelmer
  • William J. Roltsch
Part of the Progress in Biological Control book series (PIBC, volume 4)

Field-cage evaluations of parasitoids in the genera Eretmocerus and Encarsia from 13 different countries were conducted from 1995 to 1997 to identify effective new species or geographic populations of natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci on key host crops of whiteflies in desert valleys in the southwestern USA. Top performing species and selected populations of Eretmocerus were then compared on cantaloupe, a key crop for spring whitefly increase, and on citrus, an overwintering host. The best-performing species included Eret. emiratus and/or Eret. sp. near emiratus from the United Arab Emirates and Ethiopia, several populations of Eret. mundus, and a population of Enc. sophia from Pakistan. These species originated in regions with climates very similar to the Imperial Valley, California.

Keywords

Natural Enemy Dominican Republic Geographic Population Female Parasitoid Progeny Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Booth, R.G. and A. Polaszek. 1996. The identities of ladybird beetle predators used for whitefly control, with notes on some whitefly parasitoids, in Europe. Brighton Crop Protection Conference–Pests & Diseases, Brighton England, November 18–21, 1996. Proceedings Vol. 2B–2: 69–74. British Crop Protection Council, Alton Hampshire, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Ellis, D.R., R.J. McAvoy, L. Abu Ayyash, M. Flanagan, and M.A. Ciomperlik. 2001. Evaluation of Serangium parcesetosum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for biological control of silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), on poinsettia. Florida Entomologist 84: 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Faust, R.M. 1992. Conference report and 5-year national research and action plan for development of management and control methodology for the sweetpotato whitefly. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-107.Google Scholar
  4. Goolsby, J.A., M.A. Ciomperlik, B.C. Legaspi, J.C. Legaspi, and L.E. Wendel. 1998. Laboratory and field evaluation of exotic parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci (Biotype ‘B’) in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Biological Control 12: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goolsby, J., J.C. Legaspi, and B.C. Legaspi. 1996. Quarantine evaluation of exotic parasitoids of the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Southwestern Entomologist 21: 13–21.Google Scholar
  6. Gonzalez, R.A., G.E. Goldman, E.T. Natwick, H.R. Rosenberg., J.I. Grieshop, S.R. Sutter, T. Funakoshi, and S. Davila-Garcia. 1992. Whitefly invasion in Imperial Valley costs growers, workers millions in losses. California Agriculture 46 (Sept.–Oct.): 7–8.Google Scholar
  7. Headrick, D.H., T.S. Bellows, Jr., and T.M. Perring. 1996. Behaviors of female Eretmocerus sp. nr. californicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) attacking Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (Malvaceae) and melon, Cucumis melo (Cucurbitaceae). Biological Control 6: 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joyce, A. and T.S. Bellows. 1997. Field cage evaluation of Amitus bennetti (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae), a parasitoid of Bemisia argentifolii. In T.J. Henneberry, N.C. Toscano, T.M. Perring, and R.M. Faust, eds., Silverleaf Whitefly: 1997 Supplement, 5-Year National Research and Action Plan, 5th Annual Review, San Diego, CA, January 28–30, 1997. US Department of Agriculture, ARS, Washington, DC. ARS 1997–02, p. 153.Google Scholar
  9. Joyce, A.L., T.S. Bellows, and D.H. Headrick. 1999. Reproductive biology and search behavior of Amitus bennetti (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae), a parasitoid of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environmental Entomology 28: 282–289.Google Scholar
  10. Legaspi, J.C., B.C. Legaspi, Jr., R.L. Meagher, Jr., and M.A. Ciomperlik. 1996. Evaluation of Serangium parcesetosum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) as a biological control agent of the silverleaf whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environmental Entomology 25: 1421–1427.Google Scholar
  11. Naranjo, S.E. 2001. Conservation and evaluation of natural enemies in IPM systems for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Protection 20: 835–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pantoja, A., M.A. Ciomperlik, N. Gabriel, P. Vasquez, L. Wiscovitch, and W. Robles. 2002. Evaluation of the establishment and distribution of exotic biological control agents of silverleaf whitefly in Puerto Rico. In T.J.Henneberry, R.M. Faust, W.A. Jones, and T.M. Perring, eds., Silverleaf Whitefly: National Research, Action and Technology Transfer Plan (Formerly Sweetpotato Whitefly, Strain B): 4th Annual Review of the Second 5-Year Plan and Final Report for 1992–2002. San Diego, CA, February 10–12, 2002. US Department of Agriculture, ARS, Washington, DC, p. 165.Google Scholar
  13. Perring, T.M., A. Cooper, D.J. Kazmer, C. Shields, and J. Shields. 1991. New strain of sweetpotato whitefly invades California vegetables. California Agriculture 45 (Nov.–Dec.): 10–12.Google Scholar
  14. Quicke, D.L.J. 1997. Parasitic Wasps. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Hoelmer
    • 1
  • William J. Roltsch
    • 2
  1. 1.Beneficial Insect Introduction Research UnitUSDA-ARSNewarkUSA
  2. 2.California Department of Food & AgricultureBiological Control ProgramSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations