Among other things, Gregory Bateson is considered a pioneer in the study of communication in living systems and evolution. His contribution to cybernetics was very special because for him communication was a characteristic property of the living world. But his formulation of information as differences sensed by living systems did not hinder him from using the rest of the conceptual tool-box from cybernetics like, e.g., the notions of feedback, digital and analogical codes, and even information as improbability or restraints, which in his view emphasised the importance of the context in a developmental pathway. Being a central figure in the development of cybernetic theory he collaborated with a range of researchers from the life sciences who were innovating their own disciplines by introducing cybernetic concepts in their particular fields and disciplines. In the light of this, it should not come as a surprise today to realize how the general ideas that he was postulating for the study of communication systems in biology fit so well with the astonishing findings of current molecular biology, for example in the field of cellular signal transduction networks. I guess this is the case due to the fruitfulness of his abductive approach, being as he was concerned with advancing the search for fundamental principles in communication processes in living systems at different hierarchical levels. In this paper I point out some passages to illustrate Bateson’s coherent approach to context-dependent information, hierarchical contexts and analog/digital communication, which I think molecular biologists could find of great inspiration. In particular I highlight ten “Batesonean ideas” that may prove to be of great relevance to the field of cellular signal transduction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baldwin, Ian T; Halitschke, Rayko; Kessler, Andre; Schittko, Ursula (2001). Merging molecular and ecological approaches in plant-insect interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4 (4): 351–358.
Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Chandler Publishing Company.
Bateson, Gregory (1979). Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity. New York: Bantam Books.
Bateson, Gregory and Mary Catherine Bateson (1987). Angels Fear. Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Bateson, Patrick (1998). Genes, environment and the development of behaviour. In: Gregory R. Bock and Jamie A. Goode (eds.), The Limits of Reductionism in Biology. England: Novartis Foundation–John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 193–202.
Bruni, Luis E. (2002). Does “quorum sensing” imply a new type of biological information? Sign Systems Studies 30 (1): 221–243.
Bruni, Luis E. (2003). A Sign-theoretic Approach to Biotechnology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen.
Bruni, Luis E. (2006). Cellular Semiotics and Signal Transduction. In: M. Barbieri (ed.), Introduction to Biosemiotics. The New Biological Synthesis. Springer.
Eder, Jörg and Fersht, Alan R. (1995). Pro-sequence-assisted protein folding. Molecular Microbiology 16 (4): 609–614.
Emmeche, Claus (1999). The Sarkar challenge to biosemiotics: is there any information in a cell? Semiotica 127 (1/4): 273–293.
Heims, Steve J. (1991). The Cybernetics Group. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Henderson Richard (1998). Macromolecular structure and self-assembly. In: Gregory R. Bock and Jamie A. Goode (eds.), The Limits of Reductionism in Biology. England: Novartis Foundation–John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 36–55.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1997). Biosemiotics: Towards a New Synthesis in Biology. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 9 (2): 355–376.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper and Claus Emmeche (1991). Code-Duality and the Semiotics of Nature. In: Anderson Myrdene and Merrell Floyd (eds.), On Semiotic Modelling. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 117–166.
Levy, Robert I. and Roy Rappaport (1982). “Obituary.” American Anthropologist 84 (2), June 1982.
Lodish, H., A. Berk, S.L. Zipursky, P. Matsudaira, D. Baltimore and J. Darnell (2000). Molecular Cell Biology. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
May, Rober (1998). Levels of organization in ecological systems. In: Gregory R. Bock and Jamie A. Goode (eds.), The Limits of Reductionism in Biology. England: Novartis Foundation–John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 193–202.
Nagel, Thomas (1998). Reductionism and antireductionism. In: Gregory R. Bock and Jamie A. Goode (eds.), The Limits of Reductionism in Biology. England: Novartis Foundation–John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 3–14.
Nimchuk, Zachary, Laurence Rohmer, Jeff H. Chang, and Jeffery L. Dangl (2001). Knowing the dancer from the dance: R-gene products and their interactions with other proteins from host and pathogen. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4: 288–294.
Noble, Denis (1998). Reduction and integration in understanding the heart. In: Gregory R. Bock and Jamie A. Goode (eds.), The limits of reductionism in biology. England: Novartis Foundation-John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 56–72.
Nurse, Paul (1998). Reductionism and explanation in cell biology. In: Gregory R. Bock and Jamie A. Goode (eds.), The Limits of Reductionism in Biology. England: Novartis Foundation–John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 93–105.
Pongor, S. and Landsman, D. (1999). Bioinformatics and the Developing World. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, No. 40:10–13.
Quinn, W.G. (1998). Reductionism in learning and memory. In: Gregory R. Bock and Jamie A. Goode (eds.), The Limits of Reductionism in Biology. England: Novartis Foundation–John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 117–132.
Santaella Braga, Lucia (1999). A new causality for the understanding of the living. Semiotica 127 (1/4): 497–519.
Sarkar, Sahotra (1996). Biological Information: a Skeptical Look at Some Central Dogmas of Molecular Biology. In: Sarkar Sahotra (ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187–231.
Segal, Jérôme (1998). Theorie de l’information: science, techniques et société de la seconde guerre mondiale à l’aube du XXIe siècle. Thèse de Doctorat. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2.
Smaglik, Paul (2000). “For my next trick …” Nature 407: 828–829, 19 October 2000.
Tomkins, G. M. (1975). The Metabolic Code. Science 189: 760–763.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bruni, L.E. (2008). Gregory Bateson's Relevance to Current Molecular Biology. In: Hoffmeyer, J. (eds) A Legacy for Living Systems. Biosemiotics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6706-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6706-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6705-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6706-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)