Shepherds, Sheep and Forest Fires: A Reconception of Grazingland Management

  • Bernard Hubert
  • Michel Meuret
  • Joseph Bonnemaire

Abstract

New research relating to Mediterranean grazingland management issues, e.g. fire hazard control, biodiversity conservation, vibrant rural areas, etc. addresses the role that livestock farming systems can play. Established technical knowledge about livestock farming cannot contribute to these issues because it relies on standardised animal feeding techniques, focusing on cultivable forage areas and distribution of feed. These have led to the decline of the herders’ knowledge of grazing management and of herding practices. Thus original research works were needed. The works have been carried out by an interdisciplinary team of researchers in animal sciences, ecology and social sciences, from an INRA laboratory in Avignon (France)

The research focuses on how the herders interact with ecosystems and landscapes through the management of their flocks, and investigations deal with the question of ‘how can one steer grazing for animal production and environment maintenance?’ (i.e. control scrub development, maintain biodiversity and promote the habitat of particular populations of plants and animals in need of protection). The paper presents the chronicle of this research over twenty years. It asks how the problematic evolved as a result of the accumulated scientific knowledge and the shift in societal questioning in relation to the rise of environmental concerns and the changes in rural and residential issues. Field observations, surveys and inquiries, public policies analysis, farm monitoring and systems modelling were used, combined or successively, in the course of five different research stages

The authors lead up to an analysis of the different epistemological standpoints of disciplines and types of actual action representing a transdisciplinary approach. This approach is founded on a distributed view of knowledge, articulating different forms of scientific knowledge – according to the set of involved disciplines – and lay person knowledge and know-how in order to produce relevant categories and rules of action.

Keywords

Problem oriented research Knowledge and action Forest fire hazards Grazing and herding practices Mediterranean areas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agreil, C. and Meuret, M.: 2004, An improved method for quantifying intake rate and ingestive behaviour of ruminants in diverse and variable habitats using direct observation, Small Ruminant Research 54, 1–2, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agreil, C., Meuret, M., and Fritz, H.: 2005, Adjustment of feeding choices and intake by a ruminant foraging in varied and variable environments: new insights from continuous bite monitoring. In: V. Bels (ed.), Feeding in Domestic Vertebrates: from Structure to Behaviour, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 302–325.Google Scholar
  3. Agreil, C., Meuret, M., and Vincent, M.: 2004, Grenouille: une méthode pour gérer les ressources alimentaires pour des ovins sur milieux embroussaillés, Fourrages 180, 467–481.Google Scholar
  4. Akrich, M.: 1993, Les objets techniques et leurs utilisateurs. De la conception à l’action. In: B. Conein, N. Dodier, and L. Thévenot (eds), Les objets dans l’action. De la maison au laboratoire. coll. “Raisons pratiques”, 4, EHESS, Paris, pp. 35–58.Google Scholar
  5. Alphandéry, P. and Billaud, J.-P. (eds): 1996, Cultiver la nature, Études Rurales 141–142, 233pp.Google Scholar
  6. Bawden, R.J.: 1997, Learning to persist: A systemic view of development. In: F.A. Stowell, R.L. Ison, R. Armson, J. Holloway, S. Jackson, and S. McRobb (eds), Systems for Sustainability, Plenum Press, New York and London, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U.: 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London, 260pp.Google Scholar
  8. Bonnemaire, J.: 2001, Enjeux sur les savoirs et les objets de la zootechnie: l’élevage entre science, technologie, nature et société, C.R. Acad Agric, Fr., 87, 4, 237–260.Google Scholar
  9. Bonnemaire, J. and Osty, P.L.: 2004, Approche systémique des systèmes d’élevage: Quelques avancées et enjeux de recherche. C.R. Acad. Agric. Fr., 90, n2 – séance du 11 février 2004, 29 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Callon, M.: 1989, La science et ses réseaux. Genèse et circulation des faits scientifiques, Paris, La Découverte.Google Scholar
  11. Callon, M.: 1998, Des différentes formes de démocratie technique, Annales des Mines, janvier, 63–73.Google Scholar
  12. Chabert, J.-P., Lécrivain, E., and Meuret, M.: 1998, Éleveurs et chercheurs face aux broussailles, Courrier Environnement Inra 35, 5–12.Google Scholar
  13. Checkland, P.: 1993, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 330pp.Google Scholar
  14. Colas, S., Müller, F., Meuret, M., and Agreil, C. (eds): 2002, Pâturage sur pelouses sèches: un guide d’aide à la mise en oeuvre. Espaces Naturels de France, Fédération des Conservatoires régionaux d’Espaces naturels, Programme LIFE-Nature Protection des pelouses relictuelles de France, 139pp.Google Scholar
  15. Couix, N. and Hubert, B.: 2000, Promoting collective learning in a land-use management project: Thirteen years experience in researcher-technician partnership in the Cévennes, France. In: LEARN (eds), Cow up a Tree. Knowing and learning for change in agriculture. Case studies from Industrialised Countries. Science Update, INRA Editions, Paris, pp. 121–140.Google Scholar
  16. Daget, P. and Poissonet, J.: 1971, Une méthode d’analyse phytoécologique des prairies. Critères d’application, Annales d’Agronomie 22, 5–41.Google Scholar
  17. Deverre, C.: 2004, Les nouveaux liens sociaux au territoire, Natures, Sciences et Sociétés 2, 12, 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deverre, C., Hubert, B., and Meuret, M.: 1995, The know-how of Livestock farmers challenged by new objectives for European farming: I. Rangelands usages, greatness and decay. In: Proceedings of Vth International Rangeland Congress, Salt Lake City, pp. 115–116.Google Scholar
  19. Deverre, C., Mormont, M., and Selman, P.: 2000, Consensus building for sustainability in the wider countryside, Rapport final à l’Union Européenne, contrat no. ENV4-CT96-0293.Google Scholar
  20. Dodier, N.: 1997, Remarques sur la conscience du collectif dans les réseaux socio-techniques, Sociol. Travail 2, 131–148.Google Scholar
  21. Etienne, M., Hubert, B., Jullian, P., Lécrivain, E., Legrand, C., Meuret, M., Napoléone, M., Arnaud, M.-T., Garde, L., Mathey, F., Prévost, F., and Thavaud, P.: 1990, Espaces forestiers, élevage et incendies, Revue Forestière Française, n spécial ’Espaces forestiers et incendies’, 42, 156–172.Google Scholar
  22. Hatchuel, A.: 2000, Intervention research and the production of knowledge. In: LEARN (eds), Cow up a tree. Knowing and learning for change in agriculture. Case studies from industrialised countries. Science Update, INRA Editions, Paris, pp. 55–68.Google Scholar
  23. Hubert, B.: 2001, Une démarche systémique pour une agriculture durable: concilier survie et durabilité des systèmes pastoraux, Journal for Farming Systems Research-Extension, special issue, 57–85.Google Scholar
  24. Hubert, B.: 2002, Le traitement du long terme et de la prospective dans les zones ateliers (suite). Les rapports entre chercheurs et acteurs, Natures, Sciences, Sociétés 10, 4, 51–62.Google Scholar
  25. Hubert, B.: 2005, L’interdisciplinarité sciences sociales/sciences de la nature dans les recherches sur problème. In: R. Teulier and P. Lorino (eds), Entre connaissance et organisation: l’activité collective. L’entreprise face au défi de la connaissance, Colloque de Cerisy, La découverte, Paris, pp. 133–155.Google Scholar
  26. Hubert, B. and Bonnemaire, J.: 2000, La construction des objets dans la recherche interdisciplinaire finalisée: de nouvelles exigences pour l’évaluation, Natures, Sciences, Sociétés 8, 3, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hubert, B., Deverre, C., and Meuret, M.: 1995, The know-how of Livestock farmers challenged by new objectives for European farming: II. Reassigning rangelands to new, environment-related usages. In: Proceedings of Vth International Rangeland Congress, Salt Lake City, pp. 251–252.Google Scholar
  28. Joffre, R., Hubert, B., and Meuret, M.: 1991, Les systèmes agrosylvopastoraux méditerranéens: réflexions à propos de la gestion de ces espaces fragiles. Dossier MAB 10, Unesco, Paris.Google Scholar
  29. Legay, J.M.: 1993, Questions sur la dynamique de l’exploitation halieutique. Préface. Actes de la table ronde ORSTOM/IFREMER. In: F. Laloé, H. Rey, and J.L. Durand (eds), Questions sur la dynamique de l’exploitation halieutique, ORSTOM Editions, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar
  30. Legay, J.M.: 1997, L’expérience et le modèle. Un discours sur la méthode. Coll. Sciences en questions, INRA éd., Paris.Google Scholar
  31. Le Moigne, J.L.: 1983, La théorie du système général. Théorie de la modélisation.Puf (2ème édition), Paris.Google Scholar
  32. Magda, M., Agreil, C., Meuret, M., Chambon-Dubreuil, E., and Osty, P.-L.: 2005, Managing resources by grazing in grasslands dominated by dominant shrub species. In: J.-A. Milne (ed), Pastoral Systems in Marginal Environments, Wageningen Academic Publishers, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  33. Meuret, M.: 1988, Feasibility of in vivo digestibility trials with lactating goats browsing fresh leafy branches, Small Ruminant Research 1, 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meuret, M.: 1993, Les règles de l’Art: garder des troupeaux au pâturage, Études et Recherches Systèmes Agraires et Développement 27, 199–216.Google Scholar
  35. Meuret, M.: 1997, How do I cope with that bush?: Optimizing on less palatable feeds at pasture using the Menu model. Recent advances. In: J.E. Gonda et.al. (eds), Small Ruminant Nutrition, Options Méditerranéennes, A-34, pp. 53–57.Google Scholar
  36. Meuret, M.: 2004, Concevoir des habitats pour troupeaux domestiques, Espaces Naturels 8, 11.Google Scholar
  37. Meuret, M., Bartiaux-Thill, N., and Bourbouze, A.: 1985, Évaluation de la consommation d’un troupeau de chèvres laitières sur parcours forestier: méthode d’observation directe des coups de dents; méthode du marqueur oxyde de chrome, Annales de Zootechnie, 34, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meuret, M. and Dumont, B.: 2000, Advances in modelling animal-vegetation interactions and their use in guiding grazing management. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Livestock Farming Systems. Integrating Animal Science Advances into the Search for Sustainability, Posieux (Switzerland), EAAP Pub, Wageningen, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar
  39. Meuret, M. and Giger-Reverdin, S.: 1990, A comparison of two ways of expressing the voluntary intake of oak foliage-based diets in goats raised on rangelands, Reproduction, Nutrition, Développement, 6, 2, 205s–206s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mormont, M.: 1996, Agriculture et environnement: pour une sociologie des dispositifs, Economie rurale 236, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pavé, A.: 1994, Modélisation en biologie et en écologie, Aléas éd., Lyon.Google Scholar
  42. Priéto, L.: 1975, Pertinence et pratique. Essai de sémiologie, Edition de Minuit Paris.Google Scholar
  43. De Simiane, M. and Meuret, M.: 1994, Un complément spécial parcours, La Chèvre, 2002, 26–29.Google Scholar
  44. Teulier, R. and Hubert, B.: 2004, The notion of “intermediary concept” contributes to a better understanding of the generative dance between knowledge and knowing. In: 20th EGOS Conference, Ljubljana (Slovenia), 30-06/3-07/2004. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Hubert
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michel Meuret
  • Joseph Bonnemaire
  1. 1.Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)ParisFrance
  2. 2.Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences SocialesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations