Abstract
This article presents a transdisciplinary research approach illustrated by a case study on sustainable regional development in the Swiss canton Appenzell Ausserrhoden (AR). The canton is a typical central European rural landscape, struggling with problems of structural change and migration. Different industry sectors (timber, dairy farming and textile production), as well as different aspects of regional development (land use, mobility, landscape protection and tourism) were analysed in a two year transdisciplinary research project. Its goal was to generate cross-sectoral long-term development strategies based on different scenarios for future land use. The study shows that current development strategies will not lead to a desirable future state. There are several desirable developments, but clear political decisions are necessary for targeting a specific scenario. ∈dent The project was jointly led by a professor of ETH Zurich and the governing chairman of AR. The study involved numerous officials and inhabitants of AR, as well as scientists and advanced students from different research institutes (citeauthorch14:scholz2002, citeyearch14:scholz2002; citeauthorch14:scholz2003, citeyearch14:scholz2003). The study combined teaching, research and application. ∈dent The case study is presented as an example of the Transdisciplinary Integrated Planning and Synthesis (TIPS) approach (citeauthorch14:scholz2006, citeyearch14:scholz2006). TIPS is an approach to embed a formal, scientifically based, integrated planning approach into a real world setting, allowing for mutual learning among scientists and practitioners. It starts from a faceting of the case, then uses system analysis and scenario construction for the problem investigation procedure. In the problem transformation (or ‘implementation’) phase, the preferences of the stakeholders are evaluated through multi-criteria procedures and area development negotiation. The results from the different facets are integrated, and cross-sectoral development strategies for the case are formulated. ∈dent The chapter gives an overview of the organisation, methodology and epistemology of the TIPS approach. The following three sections describe the transdisciplinary TIPS approach: problem identification, problem investigation and problem transformation. Each step of the TIPS approach is explained and illustrated by examples from the case study. Special emphasis is put on the integrated project architecture and on the linkage between problem investigation and problem transformation, these being the main challenges from a transdisciplinary point of view. The last section draws some conclusions on the applicability of the TIPS approach and presents recommendations for similar projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bammer, G.: 2005, Integration and implementation sciences: Building a new specialization, Ecol Soc 10(2), Art. 6.
Bazerman, M. and Neale, M.: 1993, Negotiating rationally, The Free Press, New York.
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T.: 1966, The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, Anchor, Garden City.
Binder, C., Hofer, C., Wiek, A., and Scholz, R.W.: 2004, Transition towards improved regional wood flows by integrating material flux analysis and agent analysis: The case of Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Switzerland, Ecol Econ 49(1), 1–17.
Checkland, P.: 1999, Soft systems methodology a 30-year retrospective, Wiley, Chichester.
Clark, W.C. and Dickson, N.M.: 2003, Sustainability science: The emerging research program. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 8059–8061.
Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., and Wiesmann, U.: 2006, Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainable research, Ecol Econ 60(1), 119–128.
Holmberg, J. and Robèrt, K.: 2000, Backcasting – A framework for strategic planning, Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 7(4), 291–308.
Lawrence, R.J. and Desprès, C.: 2004, Futures of transdisciplinarity, Futures 36, 397–405.
Loukopoulos, P. and Scholz, R.W.: 2004, Sustainable future urban mobility: Using “area development negotiations” for scenario assessment and participatory strategic planning, Environ Plann A 36, 2203–2226.
Thompson-Klein, J., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Häberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R., and Welti, M. (eds): 2001, Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity, Birkhäuser, Basel.
Meppem, T. and Gill, R.: 1998, Planning for sustainability as a learning concept, Ecol Econ 26(2), 121–137.
Mingers, J. and Rosenhead, J.: 2004, Problem structuring methods in action, Eur J Oper Res 152(3), 530–554.
Pohl, C.: 2005, Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research, Futures, 37, 1159–1178.
Pruitt, D. and Carnevale, P.: 1993, Negotiation in social conflict, Brooks/Cole, Belmont.
Ravetz, J.: 2000, Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions, Environ Impact Assess Rev 20, 31–64.
Resnick, L.: 1987, Learning in school and out, Educ Res 16(9), 13–20.
Scholz, R.W., Bösch, S., Koller, T., Mieg, H.A., and Stünzi, J. (eds): 1996, Industrieareal Sulzer-Escher Wyss: Umwelt und Bauen: Wertschöpfung durch Umnutzung [Industrial area Sulzer-Escher Wyss: Environment and construction: Value added through re-use], Vdf, Zurich.
Scholz, R.W., Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Walter, A.I., and Stauffacher, M.: 2006, Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory, Int J Sustain High Educ 7(3), 226–251.
Scholz, R.W. and Stauffacher, M.: 2007, Managing transitions in clusters: Area development negotiations as a tool for sustaining traditional industries in a Swiss pre-alpine region, Environ Plann A 39, 2518–2539.
Scholz, R.W., Stauffacher, M., Bösch, S., and Krütli, P. (eds): 2003, Appenzell Ausserrhoden – Umwelt Wirtschaft Region [Environment Economy Region], Ruegger, Zurich.
Scholz, R.W., Stauffacher, M., Bösch, S., and Wiek, A. (eds): 2002, Landschaftsnutzung für die Zukunft: der Fall Appenzell Ausserrhoden. ETH-NSSI Fallstudie 2001 [Utilisation of landscape for the future: The case of Appenzell Ausserrhoden], Ruegger. Zurich.
Scholz, R.W. and Tietje, O.: 2002, Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative Knowledge, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Stauffacher, M., Walter, A.I., Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., and Scholz, R.W.: 2006, Learning to research environmental problems from a functional sociocultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach, Int J Sustain High Educ 7(3), 252–275.
Steiner, G. and Posch, A.: 2006, Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: An innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems, J Cleaner Product 14, 877–890
Susskind, L.: 1999, The consensus building handbook a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Tietje, O.: 2005, Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenarios, Eur J Oper Res 162(2), 418–432.
Tress, B., Tress, G., and Fry, G.: 2005. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landscape Urban Plan 70(1-2), 177–191.
Walter, A.I., Helgenberger, S., Wiek, A., and Scholz, R.W.: 2007, Social impact evaluation of transdisciplinary research, Eval Program Plan 30, 325–333.
Walter, A.I. and Scholz, R.W.: 2007, Critical success conditions of multi-actor transport planning: A comparative evaluation using rough set analysis, Transportation 34(2), 195–212.
Wiek, A., Binder, C., and Scholz, R.W.: 2006, Functions of scenarios in transition processes, Futures 38(7), 740–766.
Wiek, A. and Walter, A.I.: submitted, A formalized transdisciplinary approach to integrate sectoral planning and decision-making in complex systems, Eur J Oper Res.
Wilson, B. and Myers, K.: 2000, Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In: D. Jonassen and S. Land (eds), Theoretical foundations of learning environments, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp. 57–88.
Yin, R.: 1984, Case study research: Design and methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walter, A.I., Wiek, A., Scholz, R.E. (2008). Constructing Regional Development Strategies A Case Study Approach for Integrated Planning and Synthesis. In: Hadorn, G.H., et al. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6698-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6699-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)