An Asymptotic Consistency Criterion for Optimizing Defuzzification in Fuzzy Control

  • Hyei Kyung Lee
  • Eric Paillet
  • Werner Peeters
Part of the Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications book series (MMTA, volume 24)

Abstract

In [6], we already pointed out that in a fuzzy control process, the choice of a good defuzzification method is quintessential. Throughout the literature, various defuzzification methods have been proposed, classified according to the properties they fulfil, such as continuity, scale invariance, core consistenty and so forth. In [6] we added a new criterion, by demanding that the defuzzification of the fuzzy image of a basic function, such as the identity, should still yield the identity, and we immediately found that this is almost never the case. However, the numerical deviation of this result can be established as a measure of fitness for the fuzzy controller in the particular problem. Moreover, given a parametric family of such defuzzification operators, such as D.P. Filev and R.R. Yager’s BADD-defuzzification ([3]), we were able to optimize the problem with respect to the arbitrary parameter. In this chapter, we will weaken out Consistency Criterion posed in [6] to a version that only needs to hold in an asymptotic case, namely with an infinite refinement of the width of the fuzzy antecedent rules. We will show that what ensues is a nice numerical description of the fitness of certain (families of) fuzzy defuzzification operators.

Keywords

fuzzy control defuzzification consistency antecedent rule base 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Dubois, J. Lang and H. Prade. Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning, Part 2: Logical ap-proaches. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 40, pp. 203-244, 1991.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Dubois and H. Prade. Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning, Part 1: Inference with possibility distributions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 40, pp. 143-202, 1991.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.P. Filev and R.R. Yager. A generalized defuzzification method via BADD distributions. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 6, pp. 687-697, 1991.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.N. Kolmogorov and S.V. Fomin. Measure, Lebesgue Integrals, and Hilbert Space. Academic Press, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.E. Kerre. A comparative study of the behaviour of some popular fuzzy implication operators. in: L.A. Zadeh and J. Kacprzyk, eds., Fuzzy Logic For The Mamagement of Uncertainty. Wiley, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Lee, E. Paillet and W. Peeters A Consistency Criterion for Optimizing Defuzzification in Fuzzy Control. In: Foundations of Generic Optimization Vol II: Applications of Fuzzy Control, Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks, Editors R. Lowen and A. Verschoren. Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications, Springer Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Lowen. Fuzzy Set Theory: Basic Concepts, Techniques and Bibliography. Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.H. Mamdani and S. Assilian. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7, pp. 1-13, 1975.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.M. Norwich and I.B. Turksen. A model for the measurement of membership and the conse-quences of its empirical implementation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12, pp. 1-25, 1985.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Ruan, E.E. Kerre, G. De Cooman, B. Cappelle and F. Vanmassenhove. Influence of the fuzzy implication operator on the method-of-cases inference rule. Internat. J. Approx. Reasoning, 4, pp. 307-318, 1990.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.A. Runkler and M. Glesner. A set of axioms for defuzzification strategies — towards a theory of rational defuzzification operators. Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco, pp. 1161-1166, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.A. Runkler and M. Glesner. A set of axioms for defuzzification strategies — towards a the-ory of rational defuzzification operators. Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco, pp. 1161-1166, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Sugeno. An introductory survey of fuzzy control. Inform. Sci 36, pp. 59-83, 1985.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Van Leekwijck and E.E. Kerre. Defuzzification: criteria and classification. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 108, pp. 159-178, 1999.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.R. Yager and D.P. Filev. SLIDE: A simple adaptive defuzzification method. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 1(1), pp. 69-78, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L.A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control 8, pp. 338-353, 1965.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L.A. Zadeh. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybernet., 3, pp. 28-44, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H.J. Zimmermann. Fuzzy Set Theory And Its Applications. Kluwer Academic, Boston/ Dordrecht/London, 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyei Kyung Lee
    • 1
  • Eric Paillet
    • 1
  • Werner Peeters
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of AntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations