Mercury Pollution in Vembanadu Lake and Adjoining Muvattupuzha River, Kerala, India

  • Mahesh Mohan
  • P. K. Omana


Heavy metals are highly poisonous when they get accumulated or undergo biomagnification processes. The long existence of heavy metals in the aquatic environment is obtained by the bonding with sediments. Among those heavy metals, mercury is considered as the most dangerous pollutant to natural environment because of the ability of plants and animals to accumulate it (Porvari and Verta, 2003) and because of its detrimental effects even at very low concentration (Nriagu, 1979). Mercury present in air and water has increased dramatically in the last century owing to anthropogenic activities. Recent studies suggest that the total global atmospheric mercury has increased between 200 and 500 percent since the beginning of the Industrial Age (UNEP, 2002). Reports also indicate that its levels in rivers, coastal waters, and soil and food items are well above the acceptable levels especially in developing countries like India (Toxics Link, 2003). Pulp and paper, chloralkali, and other industries have used mercury for various purposes and it was prescribed that they were losing some of it in their wastewater. The losses of mercury from paper and pulp industry are without doubt a serious problem because much mercury is incorporated in the fibers that settle and remains in the sediments downstream (Hanson, 1971). Fertilizers, pesticides and fungicides are also a source of mercury pollution.


Monsoon Season Mercury Concentration Total Mercury Mercury Content Mercury Pollution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, K.A., 2000. Mercury analysis in environmental samples by cold vapour techniques in Encyclopedia of Analytical Chem: Instrumentation and applications. Meyers, R. A. (Ed), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, pp. 2890–2903.Google Scholar
  2. Cossa, D., Elbaz-Poulichet, F. and Nieto, J.M., 2001. Mercury in the Tinto-Odiel estuarine system (Gulf of Cadiz, Spain): Sources and dispersion. Aquatic geochemistry, 7: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Figueres, G., Martin, J.M., Meybeck, M. and Seyler, P., 1985. A comparative study of mercury contamination in the Tagus Estuary (Portugal) and major French estuaries (Gironde, Loire, Rhone). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 20: 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanson, A., 1971. Manmade sources of mercury. In: Proceedings of special symposium on mercury in man’s environment. The Royal Society of Canada.Google Scholar
  5. Jonasson, I.R. and Boyle, R.W., 1971. Geochemistry of mercury. In: Proceedings of special symposium on mercury in man’s environment. The Royal Society of Canada.Google Scholar
  6. Nriagu, J.O. (Ed), 1979. The biogeochemistry of mercury in the environment. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Porvari, V. and Verta, M., 2003. Total and methyl mercury concentration and fluxes from small boreal forest catchments in Finland. Environmental Pollution, 123: 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Trivedy, R.K. and Goel, P.K., 1986. Chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies.Google Scholar
  9. UNEP, 2002. Global Mercury Assessment.Google Scholar
  10. USEPA, 1998. Determination of mercury in water by cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry. Standard operating procedure-515.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Capital Publishing Company 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahesh Mohan
    • 1
  • P. K. Omana
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical Science DivisionCentre for Earth Science Studies AkkulamThiruvananthapuram

Personalised recommendations