Design and Responsibility: The Interdependence of Natural, Artifactual, and Human Systems

  • S. D. Noam Cook

This essay explores design as the imposition of human purpose onto nature. It argues that understanding design requires that we be able to distinguish among three different kinds of systems: natural, artifactual and human. Each kind has its own distinct requirements for stability and sustenance, yet each is also dependent upon the stability and sustenance of the other two. Design entails crafting artifactual systems by imposing aims and values from human systems onto the raw materials of natural ones. Effective and responsible design, moreover, is undermined when distinctions among systems are ignored or when one kind is treated as another. Life as we now live it is increasingly dependent upon the stability of our artifactual systems; this, in turn, is increasingly dependent upon our ability to make the value judgments by which alone we can determine that a design is worth making and how best to realize it.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arendt, H., 1998, The Human Condition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (orig. 1958).Google Scholar
  2. Bertalanffy, L. von, 1968, General System Theory: Foundations, Development and Applications, George Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Cook, S. D. N., 2005, That which governs best: leadership, ethics and human systems, in: The Quest for Moral Leaders: Essays on Leadership Ethics, J. B. Ciulla, T. L. Price, and S. E. Murphy, eds., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, S. D. N., and Brown, J. S., 1999, Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing, Organiz. Sci. 10(4):381-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, S. D. N., 1995, Autonomy, interdependence, and moral governance: pluralism in a rocking boat, in: Rethinking Public Policy-Making: Questioning Assumptions, Challenging Beliefs, M. Blunden, and M. Dando, eds., SAGE Publications, London, pp. 153-171.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J., 1938, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, Henry Holt and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Emery, F., and Trist, E., 1960, Socio-technical systems, in: Management Sciences, Models, and Techniques, Vol. 2, C. W. Churchman and M. Verhulst, eds., Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Huxley, T. H., 2002, Evolution and ethics [1893], in: Evolution and Ethics and other Essays, University Press of the Pacific, Honolulu (orig. 1896).Google Scholar
  9. March, J. G., and Simon, H. A., 1993, Organizations, Blackwell Publishing, Williston.Google Scholar
  10. Schein, E. H., 2004 Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (orig. 1985).Google Scholar
  11. Vickers, Sir Geoffrey, 1983, Human Systems Are Different, Harper & Row Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  12. Vickers, Sir Geoffrey, 1996, The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (orig. 1965).Google Scholar
  13. Wiener, N., 1962, Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (orig. 1948).Google Scholar
  14. Winner, L., 1986, Do artifacts have politics?, in: The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. D. Noam Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.San Jose State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations