Skip to main content

Friends by Design: A Design Philosophy for Personal Robotics Technology

  • Chapter
Philosophy and Design

Small robotic appliances are beginning the process of home automation. Following the lead of the affective computing movement begun by Professor Rosalind Picard in 1995 at the MIT Media lab, roboticists have also begun pursuing affective robotics, robotics that uses simulated emotions and other human expressions and body language to help the machine better interact with its users. Here I will trace the evolution of this design philosophy and present arguments that critique and expand this design philosophy using concepts gleaned from the phenomenology of artifacts as described in the literature of the philosophy of technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agence France Presse, 2005, As Japan goes grey, toymakers design dolls for the elderly in LexisNexis, copyright 2005 Agence France Presse all rights reserved, February 23, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aproberts, A., 2004, They walk among us, Robotics Trends (http://www.roboticstrends.com/ displayarticle447.html), copyright McClatchy Newspapers Inc., July 28, 2004.

  • Biever, C., 2004, Machines roll in to care for the elderly, Robotics Trends (http://www.roboticstrends. com/displayarticle395.html), copyright 2004 Reed Business Information US, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc., May 18, 2004.

  • Borgmann, A., 1984, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C., 1999, Robot in society: friend or appliance?, in: Proceedings of the 1999 Autonomous Agents Workshop on Emotion‐Based Agent Architectures, Seattle, WA, pp. 18-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C. A., 2002, Designing Sociable Robots, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C., Brooks, A., Gray, J., Hoffman, G., Kidd, C., Lee, H., Lieberman, J., Lockerd, A., and Mulanda, D., 2004, Humanoid robots as cooperative partners for people, under review (http://robotic.media.mit.edu/Papers/Breazeal‐etal‐ijhr04.pdf).

  • Brooks, R. A., 2002, Flesh and Machines, Pantheon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D., 1996, Kinds of Minds, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, B., 2003, Anthropomorphism and the social robot, Robo. and Auto. Syst. 42:177-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A., 1995, Alternative Modernity, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, B., 1988, The Electronic Sweatshop. Penguin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornyak, T., 2002, Seal of approval: researchers probe fuzzy logic of relaxation with cuddly robot, J@pan.inc (http://www.japaninc.net/article.php?articleID=819), June, 2002. Japan Economic Newswire, 2005, TokyoNow: elderly love therapeutic seal robot, copyright 2005 Kyodo News Service.

  • Kahney, L.,2003, Robot vacs are in the house, Wired,(http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,59237,00.html), June 16, 2003.

  • Kaheyama, Y., 2004, Responses to robots monitored in Japan, Robotics Trends, [http://www. roboticstrends.com], copyright 2004 Woodward Communications, Inc., April 21, 2004.

  • Kanda, T., and Ishiguro, H., 2005, Communication robots for elementary schools, http://www.irc. atr.jp/∼kanda/pdf/kanda‐aisb2005.pdf

  • Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., and Ishida, T., 2001, Psychological analysis on human‐robot interaction, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2001), pp. 4166-4173.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDorman, K., 2005, The Economist, Dec 20, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanda, T., Sato, R., Saiwaki, N., and Ishiguro, H., 2004, Friendly social robot that understands human's friendly relationships, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS2004), pp. 2215-2222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maney, K., 2003, Vacuum sweeps into history, USA Today, January 14, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, P., and D'Aluisio,2000, Robosapiens: Evolution of a New Species, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C., 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The path between engineering and philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, 1999, Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, M., Terry, C. S., trans, 1981, The Buddha in the Robot: A Robot Engineer's Thoughts on Science and Religion, Kosei Publishing, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, M., 1970, The Uncanny Valley, Energy 7(4):33-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkowitz, S., 2004, Digital People: From Bionic Humans to Androids, Joseph Henry Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L., 1988, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sullins, J.P. (2008). Friends by Design: A Design Philosophy for Personal Robotics Technology. In: Philosophy and Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics