Skip to main content

Biophysical Changes Resulting from 16 Years of Riparian Forest Rehabilitation: An Example from the Southern Ontario Agricultural Landscape

  • Chapter
Book cover Toward Agroforestry Design

Part of the book series: Advances in Agroforestry ((ADAG,volume 4))

Stream eutrophication in agricultural areas is common in North America and efforts are currently underway to reverse this process. There has been increasing interest in the use of riparian plantings to mitigate eutrophication and to enhance soil and water conservation (Nakao and Sohngen, 2000). In southern Ontario, streamside plantings, apart from conserving soil and water, may also provide tax benefits (under certain programs) in addition to providing short- and long-term woody biomass for on-farm use. Planting fast-growing hybrid poplar as a source of biofuel, for example, may make reforestation of streamsides an attractive financial proposition (Simpson et al. 1993). Reforestation of land along waterways may also compensate for losses of woodland as a result of increasing urban sprawl (Countryman and Murrow, 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abu-Zreig M., Rudra R.P., Lalinde M.N., Whiteley H.R., and Kaushik N.K. (2002) Experimental investigation of runoff reduction and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips. Hydrol. Process. 18:2029–2037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bormann F.H. and Likens G.E. (1979) Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Springer Verlag, New York, 253 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Countryman D.W. and Murrow J.C. (2000) Economic analysis of contour tree buffer strips using present net value. J. Soil. Water Conserv. 55:152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels R.B. and Gilliam J.W. (1996) Sediment and chemical load reduction by grass and riparian filters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 60:246–251.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Long M.D. and Brusven M.A. (1994) Allochthonous input of organic matter from different riparian habitats on an agriculturally impacted stream. Environ. Manage. 18:59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (1997) Waterloo-Wellington Meteorological Station, Breslau, ON, 15 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon A.M. and Kaushik N.K. (1986) Foliar nitrogen concentration and uptake in selected seed sources of Alnus glutinosa and Alnus incana used in stream rehabilitation. Internal Report (mimeo). Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, 20 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon A.M. and Kaushik N.K. (1987) Riparian forest plantations in agriculture: the beginnings. High Agric. Res. Ont. 15:6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy H.P. and Norman V.W. (1970) Field methods for measurement of fluvial sediment. pp. 23–39. In: Applications of Hydraulics, Book No.3. US Department of the Interior. Techniques of Water-Resource Investigations of the United States Geological Survey, 53 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Williams C. and Pickmere S. (1993) Long-term vegetation and water quality changes associated with the restoration of a pasture stream. pp. 93–109. In: Collier K.J. (ed.) Restoration of Aquatic Habitats. New Zealand Limnological Society, Christchruch, New Zealand, 253 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J.B. Jr. (1997) Benthic organic matter storage in streams: influence of detrital import and export, retention mechanisms, and climate. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16:109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti G.A. and Ehrman T.P. (1992) Hydraulic and particulate matter retention in a 3rd order Indiana stream. J. North Amer. Benthol. Soc. 11:341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti G.A. and Gregory S.V. (1996) Transport and retention of CPOM. In: Hauer F.R. and Lamberti G.A. (eds) Methods in Stream Ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 212–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K.H., Isenhart T.M., and Schultz R.C. (2000) Multi-species riparian buffers trap sediments and nutrients during rainfall simulations. J. Environ. Qual. 29:1200–1205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K.H., Isenhart T.M., and Schultz R.C. (2003) Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. J. Soil Wat. Conser. 58:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R., Hubbard R.K., and Williams R.G. (2000) Effects of a managed three zone riparian buffer system on shallow groundwater quality in the southeastern Coastal Plain. J. Soil Wat. Conser. 55:212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki M. (2001) Active management enhances functional values of buffers. Temp. Agrofor. 9:4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malanson G.P. (1996) Riparian Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 296 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallory E.C. (1993) Effects of some rehabilitative measures on reaches of two degraded streams draining agricultural areas. MSc. thesis, Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, 142 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin T.L., Kaushik N.K., Trevors J.T., and Whiteley H.R. (1999a) Review: Denitrification in temperate climate riparian zones. Water Air Soil Pollut. 111:171–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin T.L., Kaushik N.K., Whiteley H.R., Cook S., and Nduhiu J.W. (1999b) Groundwater nitrate concentrations in the riparian zones of two southern Ontario streams. Can Wat. Res. J. 24:125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckergow L.A., Weaver D.M., Prosser I.P., Grayson R.B., and Reed A.E.G. (2003) Before and after riparian management: sediment and nutrient exports from a small agricultural catchment, Western Australia. J. Hydrol. 270:253–273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meals D.W. and Hopkins R.B. (2002) Solutions to nutrient and sediment pollution from agriculture: Phosphorus reductions following riparian restoration in two agricultural watersheds in Vermont, USA. Wat. Sci. Technol. 45:51–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman R.J. and Décamps H. (1997) The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 28:621–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao M. and Sohngen B. (2000) The effect of site quality on the costs of reducing soil erosion with riparian buffers. J. Soil Wat. Conser. 55:231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M. (1999) Litterfall and nutrient fluxes across the terrestrial-aquatic ecotone in a rehabilitated riparian environment. MSc. thesis, Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, ON, Canada, 123 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M. and Gordon A.M. (2000) Quantity and quality of autumnal litterfall into a rehabilitated agricultural stream. J. Environ. Qual. 29:603–610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M. and Gordon A.M. (2001) Retention of leaf litter in streams from riparian plantings in southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor. Syst. 53:323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill G.J. and Gordon A.M. (1994) The nitrogen filtering capability of Carolina poplar in an artificial riparian zone. J. Environ. Qual. 23:1218–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce R.A. II, Farrand D.T., and Kurtz W.B. (2001) Projecting the bird community response resulting from the adoption of shelterbelt agroforestry practices in Eastern Nebraska. Agrofor. Syst. 53:333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozo J., Gonzalez E., Diez J.R., Molinero J., and Elosegui A. (1997) Inputs of particulate organic matter to streams with different riparian vegetation. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16:602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpkins W.W., Wineland T.R., Andress R.J., Jonston D.A., Caron G.C., Isenhart T.M., and Schulz R.C. (2002) Hydrogeological Constraints on Riparian Buffers for Reduction of Diffuse Pollution: Examples from the Bear Creek Watershed in Iowa, USA. Water Sci. Technol. 45(9):61–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J.A., Williams P.A., Pfeiffer W.C., and Gordon A.M. (1993) Biomass production on marginal and fragile agricultural lands: productivity and economics in southern Ontario, Canada, pp. 397–401. In: Schultz R. and Colletti J. (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd North American Agroforestry Conference, Guelph, ON, 13–16 August 1989, p. 465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney B.W. (1993) Effects of streamside vegetation on macroinvertebrate communities of White Clay Creek in eastern North America. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 144:291–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund R.E. and Richards N.R. (1961) The soil survey of Oxford County. Report No. 28 of the Ont. Soil Survey. Research Branch, Canada, Dept. of Agriculture and the Ont. Agricultural College, ON, Canada, 63 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oelbermann, M., Gordon, A.M., Kaushik, N.K. (2008). Biophysical Changes Resulting from 16 Years of Riparian Forest Rehabilitation: An Example from the Southern Ontario Agricultural Landscape. In: Jose, S., Gordon, A.M. (eds) Toward Agroforestry Design. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6572-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics