Advertisement

Singapore's Natural Environment, Past, Present and Future: A Construct of National Identity and Land Use Imperatives

  • Min Geh
  • Ilsa Sharp

A famed Garden City, Singapore is located in one of the world’s richest biodiversity hotspots. But because of her small size and the dominance of government for more than four decades by a single political party with a singular vision, the impact of government policy on land use and nature conservation has been decisive. The bread-and-butter imperatives of economic progress and nation-building have been paramount until quite recently. Nonetheless, Singapore has retained impressive biodiversity for a small city-state. With the maturing of Singapore’s acknowledged powerhouse economy, better balance is now being achieved, partly thanks to a constructive dialogue between planners and conservationists.

This improved dialogue has been powered by the ideological quest for national identity and “roots” through a “sense of place” that has increasingly engaged both Singapore’s government and civil society. Understanding is growing that what distinguishes Singapore’s identity is “indigenous tropicality,” rather than a manicured parkland image derived from a colonialized, Westernized sub-conscious, or even a reinvented tropicality reminiscent of hotel-resort horticulture.

Environmental NGOs’ interface with the Singapore government on land use has evolved into a less elitist, more post-modern and diffuse networking style than in the past. The shared goal is sustainable development for Singapore. In this context, we take “sustainable development”1 to mean development that protects, conserves, integrates or adapts natural2 areas, wherever possible in their original, pristine form, with the final outcome of continued survival as a viable natural heritage for future generations to enjoy. Such heritage serves a human need for continuity and identity.

Much of what has been achieved so far can be attributed to a serendipitous convergence of factors; in the final analysis however, government remains the agendasetter, promoting nature insofar as it is economically and politically affordable – i.e. sustainability for the government is equivalent to affordability.

Keywords

National Identity Natural Heritage Nature Society Singapore Government Granite Quarry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL (24 July 2003) Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424: 420–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buruma I (12 June 1988) Singapore. New York Times Magazine, p 58 (cited Koolhaas 1995: 1083)Google Scholar
  3. Cantley N (1884) Report on the forests of the Straits Settlements. Singapore Printing Office, Singapore. (Cited Corlett RT (1995) The History of Bukit Timah Nature Reserve. The Gardens Bulletin Singapore, Supplement no 3. Singapore Botanic Gardens)Google Scholar
  4. Chua BH (1997) Political legitimacy and housing, stakeholding in Singapore. Routledge, London & New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuang SH (ed) (1973) Animal life and nature in Singapore. Singapore University Press, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  6. Corlett RT (1992) The ecological transformation of Singapore, 1819–1990. Journal of Biogeography 19: 411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Statistics (various years) Yearbook of statistics. SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  8. Francesch Huidobro, M del Mar (July 2005) A ‘disciplined governance’ approach to government-NGOs relations: The structures and dynamics of environmental politics and management in Singapore. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Hong Kong (Department of Politics and Public Administration)Google Scholar
  9. Goh KS (1972) Population control: Singapore’s first decade of development. In: Goh KS (ed). The economics of modernization. Asia Pacific Press, Singapore, pp 150–253Google Scholar
  10. Ho HC (1999) The place of nature in Singapore. In: Kwok KW, Kwa CG, Kong L, Yeoh B (eds) Our place in time, exploring heritage and memory in Singapore. Singapore Heritage Society, pp 156–177Google Scholar
  11. Koh KL (2007) Singapore: from garden city to city in a garden – An aspect of sustainable development? Bayan vol v, pp 85–100, Simorgh Women’s Resource and Publication Centre, LahoreGoogle Scholar
  12. Kong L (1994) ‘Environment’ as a social concern: democratizing public arenas in Sojourn, Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 9(2): 277–287Google Scholar
  13. Koolhaas R, Mau B (1995) Singapore songlines: Portrait of a Potemkin metropolis … or thirty years of Tabula Rasa. In: Koolhaas R, Mau BS,. Office for Metropolitan Architecture, Monacelli Press, New York, pp 1008–1089Google Scholar
  14. Lee KY (2000) From Third World to First: The Singapore story 1965–2000, Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew. Times Media Private Limited, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee SK (1995) Concept of the garden city. In: Ooi GL (ed), Environment and the city, Sharing Singapore’s experience and future challenges. Times Academic Press, The Institute of Policy Studies, Singapore, pp 129–148Google Scholar
  16. Lim William SW (2002) Architecture, art, identity in Singapore, is there life after Tabula Rasa?Google Scholar
  17. Mah Bow Tan (2007) Parliamentary Debates, Official Report, 11th Parliament, Session 1, Vol 82. Sitting no 11, 27 February – Question Time, Minister for National Development to a question from MP Dr Lily Neo (Jalan Besar)Google Scholar
  18. Malayan Nature Society (October 1987) A proposal for a nature conservation area at Sungei Buloh. Singapore BranchGoogle Scholar
  19. Malayan Nature Society (October 1990) Master Plan for the conservation of nature in Singapore. Singapore BranchGoogle Scholar
  20. Ministry for the Environment & Water Resources (2006) The Singapore Green Plan 2012. SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  21. Ministry of the Environment (1992) The Singapore Green Plan: Towards a model green city. SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of the Environment (2002) The Singapore Green Plan 2012 (2002). SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  23. Nature Society (Singapore) (January 2002). Feedback on the Singapore Green Plan 2012, pp 185–200Google Scholar
  24. Samuel-Johnson K (December 2000–February 2001) An environmental scorecard. issues 2001: Trends and people to watch in the year ahead), Newsweek Special Edition, 24–25Google Scholar
  25. Sharp I (2002) Nature Society (Singapore): A child of our own. In: Singam C, Tan CK, Ng T, Perera L (eds) Building social space in Singapore. The Working Committee, Select Publishing, Singapore, pp 53–61Google Scholar
  26. Tan WK, Lee SK, Wee YC, Foong TW (1995) Urbanization and nature conservation. In: Ooi GL (ed), Environment and the city, sharing Singapore’s experience and future challenges. Times Academic Press, The Institute of Policy Studies, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  27. Turnbull CM (1989) A history of Singapore 1819–1988. Oxford University Press, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  28. Urban Redevelopment Authority (1991) Living the next lap – Towards a Tropical City of Excellence, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  29. Urban Redevelopment Authority (2001) Concept Plan 2001. SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  30. Wee YC, Corlett RT (1986) The City and the forest, plant life in urban Singapore. Singapore University Press, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  31. Wheatley P (1954) Land use in the vicinity of Singapore in the eighteen-thirties. Malay. Journal of Tropical Geography 2: 63–66Google Scholar
  32. Wong PP (1989) The transformation of the physical environment. In: Kernial Singh Sandhu and Paul Wheatley (eds) The Management of Success: The moulding of modern Singapore. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp 771–787; cited Kong L 1994: 7Google Scholar

Interviews and personal communications – conducted by Ilsa Sharp

  1. Mr Richard Hale, former Vice-president, NSS; Advisory Council member, NSS, interview 24 November 2006Google Scholar
  2. Dr Ho Hua Chew, Chairman, Conservation Committee, Nature Society of Singapore (NSS), interview 22 November 2006Google Scholar
  3. Mr N. Sivasothi, Research Officer, Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research (RMBR), Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore (NUS), interview 22 November 2006Google Scholar
  4. Ms Ria Tan, Honorary Museum Associate, RMBR, Department of Biological Sciences, NUS; NGO activist, editor of Chek Jawa Guidebook 2003, interview 23 November 2006Google Scholar
  5. Dr Wee Yeow Chin, botanist, former President NSS (personal communications 2006–2007)Google Scholar

Website resources

  1. Channel News Asia: www.channelnewsasia.com
  2. Chek Jawa campaign: http://chekjawa.nus.edu.sg
  3. http://chekjawa.nus.edu.sg/backgrd.htm ‘From research to education’
  4. Government of Singapore www.gov.sg
  5. Ministry for Environment & Water Resources www.mewr.gov.sg
  6. Ministry of National Development www.mnd.gov.sg
  7. National Environment Agency http://appnea.gov.sg
  8. National Parks Board www.nparks.gov.sg
  9. National Biodiversity Reference Centre www.nbrcnparks.org
  10. Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research rmbr.nus.edu.sg
  11. Statistics Singapore www.singstat.gov.sg
  12. Straits Times Interactive http://straitstimes.com
  13. Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve www.sbwr.org.sg
  14. The Singapore Green Map www.street-directory.com/sec
  15. UNESCO Asia Pacific Migration Research Network Issues Paper From Singapore, www.unesco.org/most/apmrnw13.htm
  16. Urban Redevelopment Authority www.ura.gov.sg

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min Geh
    • 1
  • Ilsa Sharp
    • 2
  1. 1.Mount Elizabeth HospitalSingapore
  2. 2.BentleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations