Design Collaboration Using IFC

  • John Mitchell
  • Justin Wong
  • Jim Plume

This paper reports a study that has been undertaken as part of an on-going project to examine the capacity of building information modelling (BIM) techniques to support collaborative design in the building industry. In particular, our premise is that effective design collaboration relies on the ability to exchange BIM data in a robust way using an open information standard such as IFC. The focus of this present work has been on the processes involved in design collaboration between architects and engineers responsible for advising on thermal performance issues. We begin by looking at the kinds of data that needs to be exchanged to support such collaboration. We then test the exchange using a pilot project model and finally review the capacity of the IFC standard to support such processes.


Thermal Engineer Thermal Performance Building Simulation Build Information Modelling Building Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bazjanac, V, Crawley, DB: 1997, The Implementation of Industry Foundation Classes in Simulation Tools for the Building Industry, in Building Simulation 1997, Proceedings of the International Conference, Prague, Vol. 1: 125-132.Google Scholar
  2. Bazjanac, V: 2001, Acquisition of Building Geometry in the Simulation of Energy Performance, in R Lamberts et al. (eds), Building Simulation 2001, Proceedings of the International Conference., Rio de Janeiro, 1: 305-311.Google Scholar
  3. Espedokken, K et al.: 2006, Energy Analysis A-Process Maps. Retrieved May 30, 2006 from
  4. Graphisoft: 2007, Graphisoft web site,
  5. Haug, D, et al. 2006, R&D project no 11251 Pilot Project, Tromsø University College (HITOS) for testing IFC, Statsbygg, Oslo.Google Scholar
  6. IAI: 2007, International Alliance for Interoperability,
  7. IDM: 2005, Information Delivery Manual, Using IFC to Build SMART, J Wix (ed),
  8. Kam, C, Fischer, M, Hänninen, R, Karjalainen, A and Laitinen, J: 2003, The product model and Fourth Dimension project, ITcon,8:137-166.Google Scholar
  9. Kam, C, Fischer, M: 2004, Capitalizing on early project decision-making opportunities to improve facility design, construction, and life-cycle performance—POP, PM4D, and decision dashboard approaches, Automation in Construction, No. 13: 53-65Google Scholar
  10. Karola, A, Lahtela, H, Hänninen, R, Hitchcock, RJ, Chen, Q, Dajka, S and Hagström, K: 2002, BSPro COM-Server - Interoperability between software tools using industry foundation classes, Energy and Buildings, 34: 901-907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lam, KP, Wong, NH, Shen, LJ, Mahdavi, A, Leong, E, Solihin, W, Au, KS and Kang, Z: 2006, Mapping of industry building product model for detailed thermal simulation and analysis, Advances in Engineering Software, 37: 133-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Olof Granlund: 2007, Olof Grunland web site Plume, J & Mitchell, J: 2007, Collaborative Design using a Shared IFC Building Model -Learning from Experience. Automation in Construction, 16: 28-36.
  13. Stephens, J, et al.: 2005, ifc-mBomb, Life Cycle Data for Buildings: Opportunities for the IFC Model-Based Operations and Maintenance, IAI UK Ltd, April 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Mitchell
    • 1
  • Justin Wong
    • 1
  • Jim Plume
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations