Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Science for Peace and Security Series ((NAPSC))

  • 2554 Accesses

The fracture behavior of structures depends on loading conditions, geometry of component and material properties. Therefore, in those cases when loading conditions and geometry of component are known, the material should ensure the integrity of the structure and ductile fracture behavior of component. Therefore, it is necessary to select right material for structure regarding to flaw's size and position and as well loading condition. It is especially important for safety, reliability, and integrity of pipes, where materials are exposed to different environmental influences and material-ageing processes. Fracture mechanicsbased flaw assessment concepts are increasingly used in industrial regulations and standards for ensuring structure integrity. A considerable number of different guidelines and procedures are available which are partly based on the same bases but also exhibit significant differences. The European Union sponsored Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure (SINTAP), an interdisciplinary Brite—Euram project. SINTAP is useful engineering tool, in order to find appropriate material or maximum loading capacity of structural component with crack. Parts of the structure are also deformed during manufacturing and installation. The aim of this chapter is demonstrate the use of SINTAP in order to find maximum internal pressure capacity of gas pipe, regarding to two materials degradation. The results of analysis show that decrease in mechanical properties and fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kumar V., German M. D. and Shih C. F. (1981), An Engineering Approach for Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis, EPRI, Final Report to NP 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R6 (1998), Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects, Nuclear electric procedure R/H/R6, Revision 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schwalbe, K.-H. and Cornec, A. (1991), The engineering treatment model (ETM) and its practical application, Fatigue and Fracture od Engineering Materials and Structures 14, pp. 405-412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SINTAP (1999), Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure. Final Revision. EU-Project BE 95-1462. Brite Euram Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FITNET (2006), European-Fitness-for-Services Thematic Network, final draft MK7, (Edited by Koçak M., Webster S., Janosch J.J., Ainsworth R. A., and Kores R.) European project GIRT-CT-2001-05071, Amsterdam, May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Engineering Fracture Mechanic Journal 67, (2000), Zerbst, U. (guest editor): pp. 479-668.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gubeljak, N., Zerbst U., Predan J., and Oblak M. (2004), Application of the European SINTAP procedure to the failure analysis of breken forklift, Engineering Failure Analysis 11 (1), pp. 33-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BS 7910 (1999), Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in fusion welded Structures, 4th draft.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiefner J. F., et al. (1973), Failure Stress Levels of Flaws in Pressurized Cylinders, ASTM STP 536, S.461-481.

    Google Scholar 

  10. BS 7448 (1997), Fracture mechanics toughness tests; Part 2. Method for determination of K IC , Critical CTOD and critical J values of welds in metallic materials.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ASTM E 399 (2001), Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ASTM E-1820 (2004), 01 Standard Test Method or Measurement of Fracture Toughness, Volume 03.01, ASTM International, W. Conshohocken, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gubeljak, N. (2008). Application of Sintap to the Failure Assessment of Gas Pipes. In: Pluvinage, G., Elwany, M.H. (eds) Safety, Reliability and Risks Associated with Water, Oil and Gas Pipelines. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6526-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics