Advertisement

Marine Deep-Water Free-Fall Cpt Measurements For Landslide Characterisation Off Crete, Greece (Eastern Mediterranean Sea) Part 1: A New 4000M Cone Penetrometer

  • S. Stegmann
  • A. Kopf
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 27)

The in situ measurement of seafloor physical properties such as pore pressure, shear strength or compressibility poses a challenge to engineers, in particular in the marine realm. We present the design and first use of a marine, deep-water free-fall instrument for cone penetration testing (CPT). The probe can be operated in up to 4000 m water depth to measure cone resistance, sleeve friction, deceleration, temperature and tilt as well as pore pressure in u1 and u3 position. In this paper we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the current prototype design, and dwell on the differences between quasi-static versus dynamic cone penetration testing.

Keywords

Pore Pressure Undrained Shear Strength Cone Penetration Testing Cone Resistance Cone Penetrometer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, R.H., Li, H., Valent, P.J., Lipikin, J., Esrig, M.I., 1985. In-Situ Undrained Shear Strengths and Permeabilities Derived from Piezometer Measurements, Strength Testing of Marine Seidments: Laboratory and In-Situ Measurements, ASTM STP 883, R.C. Chany, K.R., Demars, ASTM Philadelphia, p. 83–100.Google Scholar
  2. Burns, S.E., Mayne, P.W., 1998. Penetrometers for Soil Permeability and Chemical Detection. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Report No. GIT-CEEGEO-98-1.Google Scholar
  3. Christian, H.A., Heffler, D.E., Davis, E.E., 1993. Lancelot - an in situ piezometer for soft marine sediments. Deep-Sea Research, 40/7, p.1509–1520.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, E.E., Horel, G.C., MacDonald, R.D., 1991. Pore Pressure and Permeabilities Measured in Marine Sediments With a Tethered Probe. J. Geophys. Res., 96, B4, p.5975–5984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dayal, U., Allen, J. H., 1973. Instrumented Impact Cone Penetrometer. Can. Geotech. J., 10, p.397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fang, W.W., Langseth, M.G., Schultheiss, P.J., 1993. Analysis and Application of in situ Pore Pressure Measurements in Marine Sediments. J. Geophys. Res., 98, p.7921–7938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, G.W., Hamilton, T.K., Ebelhar, R.J., Mueller, J.L., Pelletier, J.H., 1988. Comparison of In-situ Vane, Cone Penetrometer, and Laboratory Test Results for Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Clays. In: Richards, A.F. (ed.), ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 1014, Vane Shear Strength Testing in Soils, Field and Laboratory Studies, p.293-305.Google Scholar
  8. Meunier, J., Sultan, N. Jegou, P., Harmegnies, F., 2004. First Test of Penfeld: a New Seabed Penetrometer. Proc. 14th Int. Offshore Polar Eng. Conference, Toulon, France, May 23-28, p.338–344.Google Scholar
  9. Osler, J., Furlong, A., Christian, H., Lamplugh, M., 2006. The integration of the Free Fall Cone Penetrometer (FFCPT) with the Moving Vessel Profiler (MVP) for the rapid assessment of seabed characteristics. Canadian Hydrographic Conference, The Westin Nova Scotian, Halifax, N.S., p.11.Google Scholar
  10. Song, C.R., Voyiadjis, G.Z., 2005. Pore pressure response of saturated soils around a penetrating object. Computers and Geotechnics, 32, p.37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stegmann, S., Villinger, H., Kopf, A., 2006a. Design of a modular, marine free- fall cone penetrometer. Sea Technology, 47/02, p.27–33.Google Scholar
  12. Stegmann, S., Moerz, T., Kopf, A., 2006b. Initial Results of a new Free Fall-Cone Penetrometer (FF-CPT) for geotechnical in situ characterisation of soft marine sediments. Norwegian Journal of Geology, 86/3, p.199–208.Google Scholar
  13. Stegmann, S., Strasser, M., Anselmetti, F.S., Kopf, A., 2007. Geotechnical in situ characterization of subaquatic slopes: The role of pore pressure transients versus frictional strength in landslide initiation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L07607, doi:10.1029/2006GL029122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stoll, R.D., Sun, Y.-F., 2005. Using Static and Dynamic Penetrometers to Measure Sea Bed Properties. Office of Naval Research, Science & Technology, Ocean Battlespace Sensing (32), Coastal Geosciences Annual Reports FY05: 1-5, also available at http://www.onr.navy.mil/obs/321/docs/cg/04/cgstoll.pdf.
  15. Stoll, R.D., Sun, Y.-F., Bitte, I., 2006. Seafloor properties from penetrometer tests. IEEE J. Ocean Eng., http://www.onr.navy.mil/obs/reports/docs/05/cgstoll.pdf.
  16. Strasser, M., Stegmann, S., Bussmann, F., Anselmetti, F.S., Rick, B., Kopf, A., 2007. Quantifying subaqueous slope stability during seismic shaking: Lake Lucerne as model for ocean margins: Marine Geology, in press.Google Scholar
  17. Strout, J.M., Tjelta, T.I., 2005. In situ pore pressure: What is their significance and how can they be reliably measured? Mar. Petrol. Geol., 22, p.275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sultan, N., Voisset, M., Maresset, B., Marsset, T., Cauquil, E., Colliat, J.-L., 2007. Potential role of compressional structures in generating submarine slope failures in the Niger Delta. Mar. Geol., 237/3-4, p.169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wright, I., 2004. Geotechnical Investigations Using Mini-Cone Penetrometer Testing. Sea Technology, 45/7, p.49–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Stegmann
    • 1
  • A. Kopf
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Centre Ocean MarginsBremen UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations