This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aissen, J. (1999). Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17, 673-711.
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, 435-483.
Arkadiev, P.M. (this volume). Differential Argument Marking in Two-term Case Systems and its Implications for the General Theory of Case Marking.
Asudeh, A. (2001). Linking, optionality, and ambiguity in Marathi. Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Ed. by P. Sells. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bittner, M. and K. Hale (1996). Ergativity: Toward a theory of a heterogeneous class. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 1-68.
Blutner, R. (2000). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17, 189-216.
Bobaljik, J.D. (1993). Nominally absolutive is not absolutely nominative. Proceedings of the Eleventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Ed. by J. Mead. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 44-60.
Butt, M. and T.H. King (2003). Case systems: Beyond structural distinctions. New Perspectives on Case Theory. Ed. by E. Brandner and H. Zinsmeister. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Davison, A. (1999a). Ergativity. Functional and formal issues. Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Ed. by M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newymeyer, M. Noonan and K. Wheatley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177-207.
Davison, A. (1999b). 'Dependent structural case' as a consequence of VP structure. Paper presented at the Perspectives on argument structure: 1999 Texas Linguistics Society Conference.
DeLancey, S. (1981). An interpretation of split ergativity and related phenomena. Language 57, 627-657.
Dixon, R.M.W. (1979). Ergativity. Language 55, 59-138.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67, 3, 547-619.
de Hoop, H. (1996). Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. New York: Garland.
de Hoop, H. (1999). Optimal Case Assignment. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1999. Ed. by R. van Bezooijen and R. Kager. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 97-109.
de Hoop, H. and B. Narasimhan (2005). Differential case-marking in Hindi. Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case. Ed. by M. Amberber and H. de Hoop. Oxford: Elsevier.
Hopper, P.J. and S.A. Thompson (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56, 2, 251-299.
Horn, L. (1984). Towards a new taxonomy of pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Ed. by D. Schiffrin. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 11-42.
Kiparsky, P. (2001) Structural case in Finnish. Lingua 111, 315-376.
Klamer, M. (this volume) Differential subject marking in Kambera (Austronesian).
Kornfilt, J. (this volume). DOM and two types of DSM in Turkish.
Lee, H. (2001). Markedness and word order freezing. Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Ed. by P. Sells. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Lee, H. (2003). Parallel optimization in case systems. Nominals: Inside and Out. Ed. by M. Butt and T.H. King. Stanford, CSLI Publications.
Lee, H. (this volume) Quantitative variation in Korean case ellipsis: implications for case theory.
Legendre, G., W. Raymond, and P. Smolensky (1993). An Optimality-Theoretic typology of case and grammatical voice systems. Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Malchukov, A.L. (2005). Case pattern splits, verb types, and construction competititon. Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case. Ed. by M. Amberber and H. de Hoop. Oxford: Elsevier.
Malchukov, A.L. (2006). Transitivity parameters and transitivity alternations: Constraining co-variation. Case, Valency, and Transitivity. Ed. by L.I. Kulikov, A.L. Malchukov and P. de Swart. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 329-357.
Mohanan, T. (1994). Argument Structure in Hindi. Stanford: Stanford University.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity. Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Ed. by R.M.W. Dixon. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 112-171.
Stiebels, B. (2000) Linker inventories, linking splits and lexical economy. Lexicon in Focus. Ed. by B. Stiebels and D. Wunderlich. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 211-245.
de Swart, P. (2003). The Case Mirror. MA-Thesis, University of Nijmegen.
Woolford, E. (1995). Object agreement in Palauan: Specificity, humanness, economy and optimality. Papers in Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Ocasional Papers 18. Ed. by J.N. Beckman, L.W. Dickey, and S. Urbanczyk. GLSA, Amherst.
Woolford, E. (this volume) Differential subject marking at argument structure, syntax, and PF.
Wunderlich, D. (1997) Case and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 27-68.
Wunderlich, D. and R. Lakämper (2001) On the interaction of structural and semantic case. Lingua 111, 277-418.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Hoop, H., Narasimhan, B. (2009). Ergative Case-marking in Hindi. In: de Hoop, H., de Swart, P. (eds) Differential Subject Marking. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6497-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6497-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6498-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6497-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)