Skip to main content

Modeling, Simulation and Run-Time Management

  • Chapter
Design, Automation, and Test in Europe
  • 1066 Accesses

The continuous scaling of electronic technologies has changed quite substantially the way integrated circuits and systems are designed. On the one hand, increased complexity calls for more powerful methods to execute the traditional CAD tasks, such as modeling, simulation, and optimization. On the other hand, new tools have become necessary to support design, as modern electronic systems differ significantly from devices of the “old times”, where the entire functionality was implemented as silicon resources. Hardware capabilities are complemented by software support, including low-level primitives and application-level services, in order to guarantee high-performance, low-power, and reliable operation of embedded systems that are at the core of most mobile and consumer electronics products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Chen, J. Sztipanovits, S. Neem, Compositional Specification of Behavioral Semantics, DATE-07: IEEE Design Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 906–911, Nice, France, April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Sztipanovits, G. Karsai, Model-Integrated Computing, IEEE Computer, Vol. 30, No. 4, 110–112, April 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Chen, J. Sztipanovits, S. Neem, Toward a Semantic Anchoring Infrastructure for Domain-Specific Modeling Languages, EMSOFT-05: ACM International Conference on Embedded Software, pp. 35–44, Jersey City, NY, September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Boerger, R. Staerk, Abstract State Machines: A Method for High Level System Design and Analysis, Springer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Wang, S. Birla, S. Neem, A Modeling Language for Vehicle Motion Control Behavioral Specification, International Workshop on Software Engineering for Automotive Systems, pp. 53–60, Shanghai, China, May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Estrin, R. Govindan, J. Heidemann, S. Kumar, Next Century Challenges: Scalable Coordination in Sensor Networks, MobiCom-99: Fifth Annual ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 263–270, Seattle, WA, August 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Rabaey, M. J. Ammer, J. L. da Silva ., D. Patel. S. Roundy, PicoRadio Supports Ad Hoc Ultra-Low Power Wireless Networking, IEEE Computer, Vol. 33, No. 7, 42–48, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Heinzelman, A. Sinha, A. Wang, A. Chandrakasann, Energy-Scalable Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless Microsensor Networks, ICASSP-00: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 3722–3725, Istanbul, Turkey, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Sinha, A. Chandrakasan, Dynamic Power Management in Wireless Sensor Networks, IEEE Design & Test of Computers, Vol. 18, No. 2, 62–74, March–April 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Bougard, F. Catthoor, D. C. Daly, A. Chandrakasan, W. Dehaene, Energy Efficiency of the IEEE 802.15. 4 Standard in Dense Wireless Microsensor Networks: Modeling and Improvement Perspectives, DATE-05: IEEE Design Automation and Test in Europepp. 196–201, Munich, Germany, March 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Borkar, Designing Reliable Systems from Unreliable Components: The Challenges of Transistor Variability and Degradation, IEEE Micro, Vol. 25, No. 6, 10–16, November/December 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Mutlu, M. Rahman, “Statistical Methods for the Estimation of Process Variation Effects on Circuit Operation”, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, Vol. 28, No. 4, 364–375, October 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. S. Fishman, A First Course in Monte Carlo, Duxbury Press, October 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amith Singhee, Rob A. Rutenbar, Statistical Blockade: A Novel Method for Very Fast Monte Carlo Simulation of Rare Circuit Events and its Application, DATE-07: IEEE Design Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 1379–1384, Nice, France, April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Mahmoodi, S. Mukhopadhyay, K. Roy, “Estimation of Delay Variations due to Random Dopant Fluctuations in Nanoscale CMOS Circuits”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 40, No. 9, 1787–1796, September 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Benini, G. De Micheli, Dynamic Power Management of Circuits and Systems: Design Techniques and CAD Tools, Kluwer Academic 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Benini, A. Bogliolo, G. De Micheli, A Survey of Design Techniques for System-Level Dynamic Power Management, IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, Vol. 8, No. 3, 299–316, June 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. B. Srivastava, A. P. Chandrakasan, R. W. Brodersen, Predictive System Shutdown and Other Architectural Techniques for Energy Efficient Programmable Computation, IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, 42–55, March 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Ren, B. H. Krogh, R. Marculescu, Hierarchical Adaptive Dynamic Power Management, IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 54, No. 4, 409–420, April 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Benini, G. Paleologo, A. Bogliolo, G. De Micheli, Policy Optimization for Dynamic Power Management, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 18, No. 6, 813–833, June 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Q. Qiu, M. Pedram, Dynamic Power Management Based on Continuous-Time Markov Decision Processes, DAC-36: ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, pp. 555–561, New Orleans, LA, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Horowitz, T. Indermaur, R. Gonzalez, Low Power Digital Design, IEEE Symposium on Low Power Electronics, pp. 8–11, San Diego, CA, October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Benini, R. Hodgson, P. Siegel, System-Level Power Estimation and Optimization, ISLPED-98: ACM/IEEE InternationalS Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Designpp. 173–178, Monterey, CA, August 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Lu, E. Y. Chung, T. Simunic, L. Benini, G. De Micheli, Quantitative Comparison of Power Management Algorithms, DATE-00: IEEE Design Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 20–26, Paris, France, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Y. Chung, L. Benini, A. Bogiolo, G. De Micheli, Dynamic Power Management for Non-Stationary Service Requests, DATE-99: IEEE Design Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 77–81, Munich, Germany, March 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Macii, E. (2008). Modeling, Simulation and Run-Time Management. In: Lauwereins, R., Madsen, J. (eds) Design, Automation, and Test in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6488-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6488-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6487-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6488-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics