Regional Air Quality–Atmospheric Nucleation Interactions

  • JaeGun Jung
  • Peter J. Adams
  • Spyros N. Pandis
Conference paper

The creation of new atmospheric particles from in situ nucleation influences climate through cloud-aerosol interactions and may negatively impact human health. Although recent observations show that nucleation is widespread over most continents, the corresponding pathways remain uncertain. A computationally efficient multicomponent aerosol dynamics model (DMAN) that simulates the full aerosol size distribution and composition starting at a diameter of 0.8 nm has been developed. Several proposed nucleation rate expressions for binary (H2SO4–H2O), ternary (NH3–H2SO4–H2O), and ion-induced nucleation are evaluated using DMAN against ambient measurements from the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS). The ternary NH3–H2SO4–H2O nucleation model is successful in predicting the presence or lack of nucleation on 19 out of 19 days with complete data sets in July 2001 and on 25 out of 29 days in January 2002. DMAN has been added to the three-dimensional (3D) Chemical Transport Model PMCAMx-UF and is tested in the Eastern USA. Reductions of ammonia emissions are predicted to decrease the frequency of nucleation events during both summer and winter, with a more dramatic effect during the summer. The response to changes in emissions of sulfur dioxide during the summer is counterintuitive. Reductions of sulfur dioxide and the resulting sulfate by up to 40% actually increase the frequency of the summer nucleation events. Modeling predicts the opposite effect in winter, with reductions of sulfur dioxide leading to fewer nucleation events.

Keywords Ultrafine PM, tropospheric aerosols, ammonia, Eastern United States, PMCAMx-UF


Sulfur Dioxide Number Concentration Nucleation Event Nucleation Parameterization Aerosol Number Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kulmala, M., et al., J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 143–176 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oberdorster, G., et al., J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A, 65, 1531–1543 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams, P.J. and Seinfeld, J.H., J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4370 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wittig, A.E., et al., Atmos. Environ., 38, 3107–3125 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jung, J., Adams, P.J., and Pandis, S.N., Atmos. Environ., 40, 2248–2259 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Napari, I., Noppel, M., Vehkamaki, H., and Kulmala, M., J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4381 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vehkamaki, H., et al., J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4622–4632 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaecker-Voirol, A. and Mirabel, P., Atmos. Environ., 23, 2053–2057 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Russell, L.M., Pandis, S.N., and Seinfeld, J.H., J. Geophys. Res., 99, 20989–21004 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spracklen, D.V., Carslaw, K.S., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.M., Mann, G.W., and Sihto, S.L., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5631–5648 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Modgil, M.S., Kumar, S., Tripathi, S.N., and Lovejoy, E.R., J. Geophys. Res., 110, 19205 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clement, C.F. and Ford, I.J., Atmos. Environ., 33, 489–499 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaydos, T.M., Stanier, C.O., and Pandis, S.N., J. Geophys. Res., 110, D07S12 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gaydos, T.M., Pinder, R., Koo, B., Fahey, K.M., Yarwood, G., and Pandis S.N., Atmos. Environ., 41, 2594–2611 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stanier, C.O., Khlystov, A.Y., and Pandis, S.N., Aeros. Sci. Tech., 38, 253–264 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • JaeGun Jung
    • 1
  • Peter J. Adams
    • 2
  • Spyros N. Pandis
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of PatrasPatraGreece

Personalised recommendations