Skip to main content

Interpolation of Soil Moisture Content Aided by FDR Sensor Observations

  • Chapter
geoENV VI – Geostatistics for Environmental Applications

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 15))

Abstract

Automated soil moisture sensors are widely used in agronomy and environmental sciences. However, to sense properly the amount of water retained in the soil matrix, a calibration with gravimetrically observed values is required. This is laborious and not appropriate when the soil physical properties change during the wetting and drying cycles due to swelling and shrinkage, respectively. The objective of this study was to analyze how gravimetric soil moisture, θ, series can be interpolated from a minimum number of field observations, using daily automated sensor output as secondary information. Weekly observed soil moisture data from three depth intervals, and daily data from four sets for FDR sensors in two adjacent plots subject to different tillage practices were used to validate the method. A variogram analysis showed that soil moisture was more persistent in time and with depth in no-tillage and that at least two scales of temporal variation could be distinguished. Kriging with an external drift produced the largest model efficiency when using calibrated sensor measurements as secondary information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Baumhardt RL, Lascano RJ, Evett SR (2000) Soil material, temperature, and salinity effects on calibration of multisensor capacitance probes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1940–1946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB. Geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Evett SR, Parkin GW (2005) Advances in soil water content sensing: The continuing maturation of technology and theory. Vadose Zone J 4:986–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fares A, Buss P, Dalton M, El-Kadi AI, Parsons LR (2004) Dual field calibration of capacitance and neutron soil water sensors in a shrinking-swelling clay soil. Vadose Zone J 3:1390–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, Nueva York, p 483

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost G, Heuvelink GBM, Papritz A (2005) Analysing the space-time distribution of soil water storage of a forest ecosystem using spatio-temporal kriging. Geoderma, 128:258–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Carpena R, Ritter A, Bosch D (2005) Field methods for monitoring soil water status. In: Benedí, Muńoz-Carpena (eds) Soil-Water-Solute process characterization. An integrated approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 778

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltineanu IC, Starr JL (1997) Real-time soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes: laboratory calibration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1576–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panatier Y (1996) VARIOWIN: Software for spatial data analysis in 2D. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyakov V, Fares A, Ryder MH (2005) Calibration of a capacitance system for measuring water content of tropical soil. Vadose Zone J 4:1004–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snepvangers JJJC, Heuvelink GBM, Huisman JA (2003) Soil water content interpolation using spatio-temporal kriging with external drift. Geoderma 112:253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil Taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil survey. 2a ed. USDA Agriculture Handbook n 436, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vanderlinden, K., Jiménez, J., Muriel, J., Perea, F., García, I., Martínez, G. (2008). Interpolation of Soil Moisture Content Aided by FDR Sensor Observations. In: Soares, A., Pereira, M.J., Dimitrakopoulos, R. (eds) geoENV VI – Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6448-7_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics