Rasa – A Life Skill

  • Sangeeta Isvaran
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 11)

Rasa (sanskrit, lit. ‘taste’), a concept first introduced in the Natyasastra, the oldest existing Indian treatise on dramaturgy (200 BC–AD 200) can be translated as aesthetic appreciation, but this is a superficial definition that does not do justice to the spiritual and philosophical implications of this term. It is perceived as an experience ranging from simple enjoyment to complete absorption, to trance, to so-called out-of-body experiences. While these terms might alarm people, it is essential to understand that rasa refers to a complete state of empathy of a person with himself or herself, with another, or with a state of being or situation.

Almost every classical dance form in South and South East Asia, (not to mention music, sculpture, poetry and literature) claims some form of rasa as its goal. In this endeavour, dance in these parts of the world becomes pure communication using the body, facial expressions, music, rhythm, dialogue, storytelling and whatever else works. There is no concept of dance as just body movement. It is complete theatre that endeavours to transport the artist and the spectator into a realm where nothing exists but art.

However rasa need not lie solely in the realm of classical art forms. This article endeavours to build a different approach to a pedagogy more suitable to the Asian framework, using the concept of rasa as perceived in various performing art traditions in South and South East Asia and from the perspective of the philosophy propounded in the Natyasastra. Since I work with dance and the educational system in Asia, I choose not to use just the physical form of the art but the underlying philosophy as well. My goal is to use rasa in novel, effective and exciting ways to aid holistic education.


Aesthetic Appreciation Gender Prejudice Holistic Education Dance Form Physical Education Curriculum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandem, I.M. and deBoer, F.E. 1995. Balinese Dance in Transition. Kaja and Kelod. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brandon, J.R. (ed.) 1993. The Cambridge Guide to Asian Theatre. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cadet, J.M. 1995. Ramakien, The Thai Epic. Chiang Mai: Browne International.Google Scholar
  4. Chandler, D. 1998. A History of Cambodia. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
  5. Cuisinier, J. (n.d.) Danses Cambodgiennes, d’après la version originale du Samdach Chaufea Thiounn, premier Ministre du gouvernement cambodgien (Cambodian dances, after the original version of Samdach Chaufea Thiounn, Prime Minister of the Cambodian Government) revised and enlarged by Jeanne Cuisinier. Phnom Penh: Royal University of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
  6. Irvine, D. 1996. Leather Gods and Wooden Heroes, Java’s Classical Wayang. Times Edition, Singapore.Google Scholar
  7. Kam, G. 2000. Ramayana in the Arts of Asia. Asia Books.Google Scholar
  8. Kravel, P.T. 1995. Sek Thom: Khmer Shadow Theatre. Khmer version edited by Thavro Phim and Sos Kem, English translation by Sos Kem, abridged, adapted and edited by Martin Hatch, Southeast Asia Program: Cornell University and UNESCO.Google Scholar
  9. Miettinen, J. 1992. Classical Dance and Theatre in South-East Asia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Nut, S.H.J. 1994. Etude du vocabulaire du theatre Royal Khmer. Thesis submitted for a masters degree of Indian Studies under the supervision of Madame Saveros Pou, University of Paris III. Also available in Cahiers d’études franco-camodgiens, Service Culturel de l’Ambassade de France, No. 6) at the Centre Culturel et de Coopération Linguistique, Pnom Penh.Google Scholar
  11. Phim, T.S. and Thompson, A. 1999. Images of Asia, Dance in Cambodia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Richman, P. (ed.) 2000. Questioning Ramayanas. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rutnin, M.M. 1996. Dance, Drama and Theatre in Thailand: The Process of Development and Modernization. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
  14. Soedarsono, W.W. 1990. The State Ritual Dance in the Court of Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University: Gadjah Mada University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Stutterheim, W. 1989. Rama-Legends and Rama-Reliefs in Indonesia. Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi: Abhinav Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Swami Satyananda Puri The Ramakirti (Ramakien): The Thai Version of the Ramayana, Bangkok: India Studies Centre, Thammasat University.Google Scholar
  17. Unni, C.P. 1998. Natyasastra, Vols. I, II, III, IV, New Delhi: Nag Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Vatsyayan, K. 1968. Classical Indian Dance in Literature and the Arts. New Delhi: Sangeeta Natak Academy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sangeeta Isvaran
    • 1
  1. 1.Chennai

Personalised recommendations