Skip to main content

Uncertainties from Multiple Stressors: Challenges in Ecological Risk Assessment

  • Conference paper
Multiple Stressors: A Challenge for the Future

Part of the book series: NATO Science for Peace and Security Series ((NAPSC))

This paper gives an overview of some of the main sources of uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA). These include numerical or statistical uncertainties (equivalent to inexactness), model and scenario uncertainties (unreliability), epistemological uncertainties (ignorance or indeterminacy) and ethical-social uncertainties. The paper argues that scientists and policy makers need to appreciate the deeper dimensions of uncertainty, and to go beyond a simple, numerical evaluation of uncertainty. Many of the challenges that multiple stressors raise for risk assessors reflect the fact that the uncertainties associated with multiple stressors are difficult to quantify and irreducible. The focus should be on a better understanding of the basic biological processes and mechanisms by which stressors interact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avila, R., Beresford, N.A., Aguero, A., Broed, R., Brown, J., Iosjpe, M., Robels, B., Suanez, A. (2004). Study of the uncertainty in estimation of the exposure of non-human biota to ionising radiation. J. Radiol. Prot. 24: A105–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CERRIE (2004). The UK Committee for Examining Radiation Risks from Internal Emitters. Report to UK Department of Environment. Available from www.cerrie.org.

  • Environment Canada (1997). Environmental assessments of the priority substances under the Canadian environmental protection act. Guidance manual, version 1.0. EPS 2/CC/3E., Chemicals Evaluation Division, Commercial Chemicals Evaluation Branch, Environment Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERICA (2005). Overview of Ecological Risk Characterization Methodology. Deliverable 4b. European Commission, 6th Framework, Contract N°FI6R-CT-2003–508847. Björk, M. & Gilek, M. (Eds).

    Google Scholar 

  • ERICA (2006a). Scientific Uncertainties. ERICA Deliverable D7e. European Commission, 6th Framework, Contract N°FI6R-CT-2003–508847. Oughton, D. and Brevik, H. (Eds).

    Google Scholar 

  • ERICA (2006b). Derivation of Predicted No Effect Dose Rate values for ecosystems (and their sub-organisational levels) exposed to radioactive substances. Deliverable D5. European Commission, 6th Framework, Contract N°FI6R-CT-2003–508847. Garnier-Laplace, J. & Gilbin, R. (Eds).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003). Technical guidance document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC f risk assessment for new notified substances and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances, Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Part II. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities. Report nr EUR 20418 EN/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • FASSET (2003). Radiation effects on plants and animals Deliverable 4. FASSET Project Contract FIGE-CT-2000–00102, Woodhead, D. & Zinger, I. (Eds).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier-Laplace, J., Della-Vedova, C., Gilbin, R., Copplestone, D., Ciffroy, P. (2006). First Derivation of Predicted-No-Effect Values for Freshwater and Terrestrial Ecosystems Exposed to Radioactive Substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 6498–6505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICRP (2005). Basis for Dosimetric Qualities Used in Radiometric Protection (Committee 2 Web document–draft only).

    Google Scholar 

  • Réal, A., Sundell-Bergman, S., Knowles, J.F., Woodhead, D.S., Zinger, I. (2004). Effects of ionising radiation exposure on plants, fish and mammals: Relevant data for environmental radiation protection. J Radiol. Prot. 24: 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G.W. (1993). Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W.E., Harremoes, P., Rotmans, J., Van der Sluijs, J.P., Van Asselt, M.B.A., Janssen, P., Krayer von Krauss, M.P. (2002). Defining Uncertainty. A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4: 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1992). Uncertainty and Environmental Learning. Global Environmental Change, 2: 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oughton, D. (2007). Uncertainties from Multiple Stressors: Challenges in Ecological Risk Assessment. In: Mothersill, C., Mosse, I., Seymour, C. (eds) Multiple Stressors: A Challenge for the Future. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6335-0_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics