Skip to main content

Comparison of funding and demand for the conservation of the charismatic koala with those for the critically endangered wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 5))

Abstract

This study contrasts the actual conservation spending and the Australian public’s demand for conservation funding for two Australian mammal species, the koala and the northern hairy-nosed wombat. It involves a survey of 204 members of the Australian public. Willingness to fund conservation action to protect the northern hairy-nosed wombat was found to be higher than that for the koala despite the koala’s immense popularity. The critically endangered status of the northern-hairy nosed wombat and the more secure conservation status of the koala is a factor likely to have influenced the comparative willingness-to-pay decisions. Actual annual conservation expenditure for both species is lower than the estimated aggregate willingness-to-pay for their conservation. Furthermore, conservation funding for the koala is much more than that for the northern hairy-nosed wombat even though the estimated public willingness-to-pay (demand) for funding koala conservation was less than for this wombat species. Reasons for this are suggested. They may also help to explain misalignment between demand for conservation funding of other species involving differences in charisma and endangerment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abbreviations

WTP:

Willingness to pay

References

  • Archer M. (1965). Rossetti and the Wombat. Apollo, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2005. The Muddle-Headed Wombat. Available from: http://shop.abc.net.au/browse/product.asp?productid=236970 [Accessed 18 February 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2002. 2001 Census Basic Community Profile and Snapshot: 305 Brisbane (Statistical Division). Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs%40census.nsf/ddc9b4f92657325cca256c3e000bdbaf/6714103d8b354507ca256bbf0000dbf9!OpenDocument [Accessed 18 April 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2004a. Population by age and sex, Australian states and territories: Table 3. Estimated Resident Population By Single Year Of AgeQueensland (June 2004). Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs%40.nsf/lookupresponses/08eb60bce5c600 17ca25688d00098cc0?opendocument [Accessed 18 April 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2004b. Population by age and sex, Australian states and territories: Table 9. Estimated Resident Population By Single Year Of AgeAustralia (June 2004). Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs%40.nsf/lookupresponses/31cb0c9f795059d1ca25688 d00099381?opendocument [Accessed 18 April 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Geographic. 2005. Wombat numbers drop. Australian Geographic 78: 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Koala Foundation. Undated. Profile - AKF. Available from: http://www.savethekoala.com/mediaprofakf.html [Accessed 15 February 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandara R. and Tisdell C.A. (2005). Changing abundance of elephants and willingness to pay for their conservation. J. Environ. Manage. 76: 47–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banks S.C., Hoyle S.D., Horsup A., Sunnucks P. and Taylor A.C. (2003). Demographic monitoring of an entire species (the northern hairy-nosed wombatLasiorhinus krefftii) by genetic analysis of non-invasively collected material. Anim. Conserv. 6: 101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman I.J., Carson R., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R. and Swanson J. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman I.J., Langford I.H., Nishikawa N. and Lake I. (2000). The Axford debate revisited: a case study illustrating different approaches to the aggregation of benefits data. J. Environ. Planning Manage. 43: 291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W.J. and Quandt R.E. (1964). Rules of thumb and optimally imperfect decisions. Am. Econ. Rev. 54: 23–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop R.C. and Heberlein T.A. (1990). The contingent valuation method. In: Johnson, R.L. and Johnson, G.V. (eds) Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory and Applications, pp 81–104. Westview, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan R. 1996. Survival of the Cutest. The Politics of being an Endangered Species. The Age, April 27, Extra 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro T.M. (2003). Umbrella species: critique and lessons from East Africa. Animal Conservation 6: 171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (2003). A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J.A. and May R.M. (2002). Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297: 191–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cork S.J., Clark T.W. and Mazur N. (2000). Introduction: an interdisciplinary effort for koala conservation. Conserv. Biol. 14: 606–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKay M.L. and McClelland G.H. (1996). Probability and utility components of endangered species preservation programs. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2: 60–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnie T. (1990). The role of zoos in the conservation of koalas. In: Lunney, D., Urquhart, C.A. and Reed, P. (eds) Koala Summit – Managing Koalas in New South Wales, pp 109. New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hurstville, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • French J. and Whatley B. (2003). Diary of a Wombat. Clarion Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S.J. (1980). A Biological Homage to Mickey Mouse. Penguin Books, Hammondsworth, Middlesex, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnthorsdottir A. (2001). Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoös 14: 204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadker N., Sharma S., David A. and Muraleedharan T.R. (1997). Willingness to pay for Boriuli National Park: evidence form contingent valuation. Ecol. Econ. 21: 105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindell M.A. and Lee A.K. (1990). Tree preferences of the koala. In: Lee, A.K., Handasyde, K.A. and Sanson, G.D. (eds) Biology of the Koala, pp 117–121. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsup A. (1999). Recovery Plan for the Northern Hairy-nosed Wombat (Lasiorhinus krefftii) 1998–2002. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Brisbane, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundloe T. and Hamilton C. 1997. Koala and Tourism: An Economic Valuation. Discussion Paper No. 13. The Australia Institute, Lyneham, Australian Capital Territory.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 2004. IUCN Red List of Endangered Species. Available from: http://redlist.org [Accessed 10 February 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S.M. (2001). Koalas. In: Bell, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of the World’s Zoo, pp 687–690. Fitzroy Dearborn, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S. (2003). Wombats. In: Jackson, S. (eds) Australian Mammals: Biology and Captive Management, pp 183–204. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S., Reid K., Spittal D. and Romer L. (2003). Koalas. In: Jackson, S. (eds) Australian Mammals: Biology and Captive Management, pp 145–182. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert S.R. (1980). American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: an update. Int. J. Study Anim. Problems 1: 87–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee A.K. and Martin R. (1988). The Koala – A Natural History. New South Wales University Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees C. and Johnson K. (2002). Australasian Species Management Program: Regional Census and Plan. Australasian Regional Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay N. (1936). The Magic Pudding: Being the Adventures of Bunyip Bluegum and his Friends Bill Barnacle and Sam Sawnoff. Farrar & Rinehart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis J.B. and Ekstrand E. (1998). Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owl. Ecol. Econ. 27: 29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis J.B., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K. and Covich A. (2000). Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem service in an impaired river basin from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol. Econ. 33: 103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K. (1970). Studies in Animal and Human BehaviorVol. 2 [translated from German by Robert Martin]. Methuen & Co. Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R. and Handasyde K. (1995). Family Phascolarctidae: koala. In: Strahan, R. (eds) The Mammals of Australia, pp 195–198. Reed Books, Chatswood, New South Wales

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R. and Handasyde K. (1999). The Koala: Natural History, Conservation and Management. UNSW Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell S., Burbidge A.A. and Morris K. 1996. The 1996 Action Plan for Australian Marsupials and Monotremes. Project 500, for the IUCN/SSC Australasian Marsupial and Monotreme Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union/Species Survival Commission. Endangered Species Program, Environment Australia, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. (2002). The future of biological diversity in a crowded world. Curr. Sci. 82: 1325–1331

    Google Scholar 

  • (2001). The New Encyclopedia of Mammals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann J.J.(eds.) 2000. The Complete Writings and Pictures of Dante Gabriel Rossetti: A Hypermedia Research Archive. Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. Available from: http://www.rossettiarchive.org/ [Accessed 10 February 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzer A., Carrick F., Menkhorst P., Lunney D. and St. John B. (2000). Overview, critical assessmentand conservation implications of koala distribution and abundance. Conserv. Biol. 14: 619–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menkhorst P. and Knight F. (2004). A Field Guide to the Mammals of Australia. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Metrick A. and Weitzman M.L. (1996). Patterns of behaviour in endangered species preservation. Land Econ. 72: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metrick A. and Weitzman M.L. (1998). Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation. J. Econ. Persp. 12: 21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R. and Adamowicz W.L. (2001). Effects of economic prosperity on numbers of threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 15: 1021–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash O. (1954). Many Long Years Ago. Dent, London

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service 2003. Recovery Plan for the Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) (Draft for Public Comment). NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hurstville, NSW. Available from: http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/npws.nsf/Content/Koala+-+draft+recovery+plan [Accessed 11 February 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Park R. (1962). The Muddle-headed Wombat. Educational Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D.W. and Moran D. (1994). Economic Value of Biodiversity. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips B. (1990). Koalas: The Little Australians We’d All Hate to Lose. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Plous S. (1993). Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. J. Social Issues 49: 11–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Public Supports Plan to Save Qld’s Koalas. EQ NewsletterIssue 21. Available from: http://www.epa.qld.gov.au/about_the_epa/public_reporting/epa_bulletin/ [Accessed 22 February 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberge J. and Angelstam P. (2004). Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conserv. Biol. 18: 76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samples K.C., Dixon J.A. and Gowen M.M. (1986). Information disclosure and endangered species valuation. Land Econ. 62: 306–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein B.A., Master L.L. and Morse L.E. (2002). Taxonomic bias and vulnerable species. Science 297: 1807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The University of Queensland. 2005. UQ News Online: State-of-the-art Koala Venture. Available from: http://www.uq.edu.au/news/index.phtml?article=2227 [Accessed 28 February 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C.A. (1982). Microeconomics of Markets. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C.A. (1996). Bounded Rationality and Economic Evolution. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C.A. (2005). Economics of Environmental Conservation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C., Swarna Nantha H. and Wilson C. (in press). Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: how important are they for proposed payments for conservation. Ecol. Econ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C., Wilson C. and Swarna Nantha H. (2005). Policies for saving a rare Australian glider: economics and ecology. Biol. Conserv. 123: 237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tkac J. (1998). The effects of information on willingness-to-pay values of endangered species. Am. J. Agri. Econ. 80: 1214–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triggs B. (1996). The Wombat: Common Wombats in Australia. University of NSW Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinca R. and Argent K. (1987). One Woolly Wombat. Kane/Miller Book Publishers, Brooklyn, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall D. (1939). Complete Adventures of Blinky Bill: Containing Blinky Bill, Blinky Bill grows up, Blinky Bill and Nutsy. Angus and Robertson, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford J. (2002). The Secret Life of Wombats. Text Publishing, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar J.H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoological Society of San Diego. 2005. Animal Bytes: Koalas. Available from: http://www.sandiegozoo.org/animalbytes/t-koala.html [Accessed 28 February 2005].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clem Tisdell .

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tisdell, C., Nantha, H.S. (2006). Comparison of funding and demand for the conservation of the charismatic koala with those for the critically endangered wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii . In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Vertebrate Conservation and Biodiversity. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6320-6_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics