Skip to main content

Conservation biogeography of anurans in Brazilian Cerrado

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1766 Accesses

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 5))

Abstract

The increasing rates of declines in anuran populations worldwide are creating demands for urgent strategies to maximize conservation efforts. This may be critical in regions for which few detailed data on diversity, abundance and distribution are available, such as in the Cerrado of Central Brazil. In this paper, we used a macroecological approach based on the extent of occurrence of 131 species of Anura (Amphibia) in the Cerrado region to design a regional network of potential areas that preserves all anuran species. The final network, obtained using a simulation annealing algorithm based on complementarity, has a total of 17 cells, widely distributed throughout the biome. Minimum costs solutions were obtained in respect to total human population size, soybean production and bovine density, because these are the factors associated with human occupation that historically are more likely to cause broad scale habitat losses. The macro-scale approach used here can provide overall guidelines for conservation and define the focus for more local and effective conservation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaron GB, Gullison RE, Rice RE, Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbitt RJF, Scott JM, Wilcove DS (2000) The geography of vulnerability: incorporating species geography and human development patterns into conservation planning. Biol Conserv 96:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andelman S, Ball I, Davis F, Stoms D (1999) SITES v. 1.0, An analytical toolbox for designing ecoregional conservation portfolios. Technical report, The Nature Conservancy. http://www.biogeog.ucsb.edu/projects/tnc/toolbox.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB (1999) Distribution patterns of biodiversity and the design of a representative reserve network in Portugal. Div Distribut 5:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB (2003) The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Williams PH (2000) Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data. Biol Conserv 96:331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo MB, Williams PH, Turner A (2002) A sequential approach to minimise threars within selected conservation areas. Biodiv Conserv 11:1011–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Thuiller W, Williams PH, Reginster I (2005) Downscaling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning. Global Ecol Biogeogr 14:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Moore JL, Brooks T, Burgess N, Hansen LA, Williams P, Rahbek C (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291:2616–2619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford SA, Laffan SW, de Kok RPJ, Orthia LA (2004) Spatial analysis of taxonomic and genetic patterns and their potential for understanding evolutionary histories. J Biogeogr 31:1715–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (2003) Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater S, Ratter JA, Ribeiro JF (2004) Biogeographic patterns, β-diversity and dominance in the cerrado biome of Brazil. Biodiv Conserv 13:2295–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briers RA (2002) Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biol Conserv 103:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza M, Moilanen A (2001) Design of reserve network and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 16:242–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti RB, Joly CA (2002) Biodiversity and conservation priorities in the cerrado region. In:␣Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (eds) The cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna, pp 351–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Chown SL, van Rensburg BJ, Gaston KJ, Rodrigues ASL, van Jaarsveld AS (2003) Energy, species richness, and human population size: conservation implications at a national scale. Ecol Appl 13:1233–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church RL, Stoms DM, Davis FW (1996) Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biol Conserv 76:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colli GR, Bastos RP, Araújo AFB (2002) The character and dynamics of the Cerrado herpetofauna. In:␣Oliveira PS, Marques RJ (eds) The Cerrado of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, Columbia, pp 223–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Csuti B, Polasky S, Williams PH, Pressey RL, Camm JD, Kershaw M, Kiester AR, Downs B, Hamilton R, Huso M and Sahr K (1997) A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol Conserv 80:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Hawkins BA (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Bastos RP, Vieira CM, Souza MC, Motta JAO, Pombal JP Jr, Peixoto JC (2004a) Anurans from a local assemblage in Central Brazil: linking local processes with macroecological patterns. Brazilian J Biol 64:41–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Vieira CM, Souza MC, Bastos RP, Brandão D, Oliveira LG (2004b) Spatial patterns in species richness and priority areas for conservation of anurans in the Cerrado region, Central Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 25:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Bastos RP, Rangel TFLVB, Bini LM, Carvalho P, Silva RJ (2005) Macroecological correlates and spatial patterns of anurans description dates in Brazilian Cerrado. Global Ecol Biogeogr 14:469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Pinto MP, Rangel TFLVB, Carvalho P, Bastos RP (2006) Anuran species richness, complementarity and conservation conflicts in Brazilian Cerrado. Acta Oecologica 29:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (2001a) Overlap of species richness and development-opportunity does not imply conflict. Science 293:1591–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (2001b) Those complementarity analyses do not reveal extent of conservation conflict in Africa. Science 293:1591–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier S, Pressey RL, Barrett TW (2000) A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biol Conserv 93:303–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (2003) The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Rodrigues ASL (2003) Reserve selection in regions with poor biological data. Conserv Biol 17:188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Evans KJ (2004) Birds and people in Europe. Proc R Soc London Ser B 271:1649–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (2001) People and biodiversity in Africa. Science 293:1591–1592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) Conservation of the Brazilian cerrado. Conserv Biol 19:707–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler JJ, White D, Master LL (2003) Integrating representation and vulnerability: two approaches for prioritizing areas for conservation. Ecol Appl 13:1762–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Imhoff M (2004) Alleviating spatial conflicts between people and biodiversity. Proc Nat Acad Sci – USA 101:182–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer BA (1994) Geographical population analysis: tools for the analysis of biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir E, Andelman S, Possingham HP (2004) Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? Ecol Lett 7:615–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Camm JD, Solow AR, Csuti B, White D, Ding R (2000) Choosing reserve network with incomplete species information. Biol Conserv 94:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Csuti B, Vossler CA, Meyers SM (2001) A comparison of taxonomic distinctness versus richness as criteria for setting conservation priorities for North American birds. Biol Conserv 97:99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham H, Ball I, Andelman S (2000) Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. In: Ferson S, Burgman M (eds) Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 291–306

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Possingham HP, Day JR (1997) Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biol Conserv 80:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel TFLVB, Bini LM, Diniz-Filho JAF, Pinto MP, Carvalho P, Bastos RP (in press). Human development and biodiversity conservation in Brazilian Cerrado. Appl Geogr

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratter JA, Dargie TCD (1992) An analysis of the floristic composition of 26 Cerrado areas in Brazil. Edin J Bot 49:235–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratter JA, Bridgewater S, Atkinson R, Ribeiro JF (1996) Analysis of the floristic composition of the Brazilian Cerrado vegetation II: comparison of the woody vegetation of 98 areas. Edinb J Bot 53:153–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Gaston KJ (2002) Rarity and conservation planning across geopolitical units. Conserv Biol. 16:674–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Abbitt RJB, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silvano DL, Sagallo MV (2005) Conservation of Brazilian amphibians. Conserv Biol 19:653–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions wordwide. Science 306:1783–1786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young BE, Lips KR, Reaser JK, Ibanez R, Salas AW, Cedeno JR, Coloma LA, Ron S, La Marca E, Meyer JR, Munoz A, Bolanos F, Chaves G, Romo D (2000) Population declines and priorities for Amphibian conservation in Latin America. Conserv Biol 15:1213–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RJ, Araujo MB, Paul J, Ladle RJ, Watson JEM, Willis KJ (2005) Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect. Div Distribut 11:3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH, Araújo MB (2000) Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity. Proc R Soc London B 267:1959–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JC, ReVelle CS, Levin SA (2004) Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves. Front Ecol Environ 2(2):98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho .

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diniz-Filho, J. et al. (2006). Conservation biogeography of anurans in Brazilian Cerrado. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Vertebrate Conservation and Biodiversity. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6320-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics