Advertisement

Lentil pp 145-158 | Cite as

Nutrient and Irrigation Management

Chapter

Abstract

Lentils are often grown in difficult edaphic conditions on stored soil water. This usually results in low yields. While water stress is often responsible for these low yields, low levels of soil fertility can also be a contributing factor. Lentils can usually fix enough N for their own requirements, although if sown into soil with extremely low available N or into cold, wet soil they may require a small amount of starter N to ensure adequate early growth to support nodulation and N fixation. While responses to fertilisers are variable, there are many reports that P at 40–60 kg/ha can help provide increased yields. Also, application of K at around 20 kg/ha may be beneficial in sandy or eroded soils. Sulfur is unlikely to be deficient if fertilisers containing S impurities are applied to other crops in the rotation. Of the micronutrients Zn and B are the two most likely to be deficient.While breeding and management can reduce the effects of drought stress lentils will often respond to irrigation with substantial yield increases. However, their high sensitivity to water logging means that irrigation can be overdone and thus decrease yield. Irrigation requirements are best calculated by considering the limiting water use deficit of the crop and irrigating to control soil moisture deficit to a value suited to the variety and soil type

Keywords

Seed Yield Faba Bean Irrigation Management Lens Culinaris Full Irrigation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Rahman KA, Shalaby EM, Abdallah MM (1980) Seed and quality of lentil as affected by different sowing dates and irrigation frequency. Research Bulletin No. 1234. Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  2. Ageeb OAA (1975/76) Annual Report, Hudeiba Research Station cited by: Ali M, Dahan R, Mishra JP, Saxena NP (1997) Towards the more efficient use of water and nutrients in food legume cropping. In R Knight (ed) Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for Pulses in the 21 st Century. Proceedings of the Third International F ood Legume Research Conference, Adelaide, S. Australia 22–26 September, 1997 355–368.Google Scholar
  3. Ali A, Khan BR, Keatinge JDH (1988) Effects of inoculation and phosphate fertilizer on lentil under rainfed conditions in upland Baluchistan. Lens Newsletter 15: 29–33.Google Scholar
  4. Ali M, Dakan JP, Saxena NP (1997) Towards the more efficient use of water and nutrients in food legume cropping. In: Knight R (ed) Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for pulses in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the third International Ford Legumes Research Conference. Adelaide, S. Australia Sept. 22–26, 1997, 355–368.Google Scholar
  5. Andrews M, Hill GD, Raven JA, Sprent JI (1992) Nitrate effects on leaf growth of grain legumes prior to nodulation: species differences relate to nitrate uptake. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Grain Legumes: 139–140.Google Scholar
  6. Andrews M, McKenzie BA, Joyce A, Andrews ME (2001) The potential of lentil (Lens culinaris) as a grain legume crop in the UK: an assessment based on a crop growth model. Annals of Applied Biology 139: 293–300Google Scholar
  7. Azad AS, Manchanda JS, Bains SS, Gill AS (1995) Phosphorus and potassium fertilizer interactions increase grain yield of lentil on sandy loam soil of Punjab, India. Lens Newsletter 22: 16–18.Google Scholar
  8. El Dessougi H (2006) Restoring soil fertility. ICARDA Caravan 23: 23–25.Google Scholar
  9. El-Sarraq G, Nourai AH 1983. A review of research on lentils (Lens culinaris) in the Sudan. Lens Newsletter 10, 1–12.Google Scholar
  10. Erskine W, El Ashkar F (1993) Rainfall and temperature effects on lentil (Lens culinaris) seed yield in the Mediterranean environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 121: 347–354Google Scholar
  11. Erskine W, Tufail M, Russell A, Tyagi MC, Rahman MM, Saxena MC (1994) Current and future strategies in breeding lentil for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica 73: 127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. French BK, Legg BJ (1979) Rothamsted irrigation 1964-76. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 15–37.Google Scholar
  13. Golubev VD, Lugovskikh MA (1974) [Pre-sowing treatment of lentil seeds with ammonium molybdate] Khimiya v Selskom Khozyaisve 12: 24–25.Google Scholar
  14. Gwal HB, Tiwari RJ, Gupta DK (1995) Fertilizer management of lentil under rain-fed conditions in Madhya Pradesh. Lens Newsletter 22: 11–12.Google Scholar
  15. Hamdi A, Erskine W, Gates P (1992) Adaptation of lentil seed yield to varying moisture supply. Crop Science 32: 987–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jain RC, Tiwari RJ, Nema DP (1995) Integrated nutrient management for lentil under rain-fed conditions in Madhya Pradesh II. Nodulation. Nutrient content and economies. Lens Newsletter 22: 13–15.Google Scholar
  17. Jermyn WD, Goulden DS, Lancaster IM, Banfield RA (1981) Lentil evaluation in New Zealand. Proceedings Agronomy Society of New Zealand 11: 77–81.Google Scholar
  18. Khare JP, Tomar GS, Tiwari UK, Sharma HL (1988) Response of lentil to nitrogen and phosphorus under rainfed conditions in central India. Lens Newsletter v>15: 12–14.Google Scholar
  19. Kusmenoglu I, Muehlbauer FJ (1998) Genetic variation for biomass and residue production in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). ll. Factors determining seed and straw yield. Crop Science 38: 911–915Google Scholar
  20. Labuda S, Weslowski M (1992) Chemical and mineral composition of lentil in flowering stage as affected by herbicide application in the field. Lens Newsletter 19, (2) : 39–42.Google Scholar
  21. Lal M, Gupta PC, Pandey RK (1988) Response of lentil to different irrigation schedules. Lens Newsletter 15, 20–23.Google Scholar
  22. Ledgard SF, and Giller KE (1995) Atmospheric N2 fixationas an alternative N source. In: Bacon PE (ed) Nitrogen fertilisation in the environment. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 443–486.Google Scholar
  23. Mahler RL, Saxena MC, Aeschrimann J (1988) Soil fertility requirements of pea lentil, chickpea and faba bean. In: Summerfield RJ (ed) World Crops: Cool Season Food Legumes. Proceedings of the International Food Legume Research Conference on pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpeas, Spokane, Washington 6–11 July 1986, 277–289.Google Scholar
  24. Matar AE (1976) Correlation between NaHC03 extractable P in soil and yield of wheat and lentil grown under dry farming conditions. ACSAD, Damascus, Soil Science P-2, 16 pp.Google Scholar
  25. McKenzie BA, Sherrell C, Gallagher JN, Hill GD (1985) Response of lentil to irrigation and sowing date. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand. 15, 47–50.Google Scholar
  26. McKenzie BA (1987) The Growth, Development and Water Use of Lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.). PhD. Thesis. Lincoln College, University of Canterbury 223 pp.Google Scholar
  27. McKenzie BA, Hill GD (1990) Growth, yield and water use of lentils (Lens culinaris) in Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114: 309–320.Google Scholar
  28. McKenzie BA, Hill GD (2004) Water use in grain legumes. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Grain Legumes/2nd International Conference on Legume Genomics and Genetics, AEP – l’Association Européenne de Recherche sur les Protéagineuse, Paris, France, 61–62.Google Scholar
  29. McKenzie BA, Miller ME, Hill GD (1989) The relationship between lentil crop production and weed biomass production in Canterbury. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 19: 11–16.Google Scholar
  30. Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ, Clement SL, Summerfield RJ (1995) Production and breeding of lentil. Advances in Agronomy 54: 283–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muehlbauer FJ, Cho S, Sarker A, McPhee KE, Coyne CJ, Rajesh PN, Ford R (2006) Application of biotechnology in breeding lentil for resistance to biotic and abiotic stress. Euphytica 147: 149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oke OL (1969) Sulphur nutrition of legumes. Experimental Agriculture 5, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen DC (2001) Production functions for chickpea, field pea and lentil in the Central Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 93: 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oweis T, Hackum A, Pala M (2004) Lentil production under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management 68, 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Penman HL (1962) Woburn irrigation 1951-59 1. Purpose, design and weather. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 343–348.Google Scholar
  36. Rathore RS, Khandwe R, Khandwe N, Singh PP (1992) Effect of irrigation schedules, phosphorus levels and phosphate solubilising organisms on lentil. I. Yield. Lens Newsletter 19, (1) 17–19.Google Scholar
  37. Saraf CS, Baitha SP (1985) Water use patterns and water requirement of lentil planted on different dates. Lens Newsletter 12, 12–18.Google Scholar
  38. Sarker A, Aydin N, Aydogan A, Sabaghpour SH, Ketata H, Kusmenoglu I, Erskine W (2002a) Winter lentils promise improved nutrition and income in West Asian Highlands. ICARDA Caravan 16: 14–16Google Scholar
  39. Sarker A, Neupane RK, Sakr B, El Ashkar F, Lutfir A, Erskine W (2002b) More grain from less rain: ICARDA’S strategy to improve lentil for resource-poor farmers in dry areas. ICARDA Caravan 17: www.icarda.org/publications/Google Scholar
  40. Saxena MC (1981) Agronomy of lentils. In: Webb C, Hawtin G (eds) Lentils Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Norwich. pp 111–129.Google Scholar
  41. Sekhon HS, Dhingra KK, Sandhu PS, Bhandari SC (1986) effect of time of sowing, phosphorus and herbicides on the response to Rhizobium inoculation. Lens Newsletter 13: 11–15.Google Scholar
  42. Sharma AK, Billore SD, Singh RP (1993) Integrated nutrient management for lentil under rainfed conditions. Lens Newsletter 20: 15–16.Google Scholar
  43. Sharma SN, Prasad R (1984) Effect of soil moisture regimes on the yield and water use of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). Irrigation Science 5: 285–293.Google Scholar
  44. Shivakumar BG, Saraf CS, Patil RR (1995) Effect of phosphorus and sulphur levels and limited irrigation on the performance of Macrosperma lentils. Lens Newsletter 22: 19–23.Google Scholar
  45. Shrestha R, Turner NC, Siddique KHM, Turner DW (2006) Physiological and seed yield responses to water deficits among lentil genotypes from diverse origins. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 903–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shrestha R, Siddique KHM, Turner NC, Turner DW, Berger JD (2005) Growth and seed yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) genotypes of West Asian and South Asian origin and crossbreds between the two under rainfed conditions in Nepal. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 971–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shuknesha A (1977) Influence of zinc on survival of rhizobia, nutrient uptake and nitrogen fixation by lentil (Lens esculenta Moevch). Pantnagar Journal of Research 2: 259.Google Scholar
  48. Siddique KHM, Loss SP, Pritchard DL, Regan L, Tennant D, Jettner RL, Wilkinson D (1998) Adaptation of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) to Mediterranean type environments: effect of time of sowing on growth, yield and water use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Siddique KHM, Tennant D, Perry MW, Belford RK (1990). Water use and water use efficiency of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Silim SN, Saxena MC, Erskine W (1993) Adaptation of lentil to Mediterranean environment. I. Factors affecting yield under drought conditions. Experimental Agriculture 29, 9–19.Google Scholar
  51. Singh NP, Saxena MC (1986) Response of lentil to phosphorus and zinc application. Lens Newsletter 13: 227–28.Google Scholar
  52. Sinha, SK (1977) Food legumes: distribution, adaptability and biology of yield. FAO Plant Production and Protection. Paper No. 3 124 pp.Google Scholar
  53. Srivastava SP, Joshi M, Johansen C, Rego TJ (1999) Boron deficiency of lentil in Nepal. Lens Newsletter 26: 22–24.Google Scholar
  54. Summerfield, RJ (1981) Adaptation to environments. In. C. Webb and G Kawtin, eds Lentils 91–110. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
  55. Tang C, Thomson BD (1996) Effects of solution pH and bicarbonate on the growth and nodulation of grain legume species. Plant and Soil 186: 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turay KK, Andrews M, McKenzie BA (1991) Effects of starter nitrogen on early growth and nodulation of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 21, 61–65.Google Scholar
  57. Verniau, S. 2007. Lentil. In The World Fertilzer Use Manual Taken from http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/publicat/html/pubman/lentil.htm downloaded 5 February, 2007.Google Scholar
  58. Wassimi NS, Abu-Shakra R, Tannous R, Hallab AH (1978) Effect of mineral nutrition on cooking quality of lentils. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58: 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White J, Millner J, Moot DJ (1999) Cereals. In White J and Hodgson J (eds) New Zealand Pasture and Crop Science. Oxford University Press, Auckland 213–234.Google Scholar
  60. Wilson D, Jamieson P, Hanson R (1984) Analysis of response of field peas to irrigation and sowing date 1. Conventional methods. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 14: 71–74.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson DR, Jamieson PD, Jermyn WA, Hanson R (1984) Models of growth and water use of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) in P.D. Hebblethwaite, M.C. Heath and T.C.K. Dawkins (eds). The Pea Crop. A Basis for Improvement. London: Butterworths; 139–151.Google Scholar
  62. Zhang H, Pala M, Oweis T, Harris H (2000) Water use and water-use efficiency of chickpea and lentil in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agriculture Group, Agriculture and Life Science DivisionLincoln UniversityNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of SciencesUniversity of SunderlandSunderlandUK

Personalised recommendations