Skip to main content

Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence

  • Chapter
Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics

Part of the book series: The Economics Of Non-Market Goods And Resources ((ENGO,volume 10))

  • 1007 Accesses

This paper empirically investigates the development of cross-country differences in energy- and labour productivity. The analysis is performed at a detailed sectoral level for 14 OECD countries, covering the period 1970–1997. A σ-convergence analysis reveals that the development over time of the cross-country variation in productivity performance differs across sectors as well as across different levels of aggregation. Both patterns of convergence as well as divergence are found. Cross-country variation of productivity levels is typically larger for energy than for labour. A β- convergence analysis provides support for the hypothesis that in most sectors lagging countries tend to catch up with technological leaders, in particular in terms of energy productivity. Moreover, the results show that convergence is conditional, meaning that productivity levels converge to country-specific steady states. Energy prices and wages are shown to positively affect energy- and labour-productivity growth, respectively. We also find evidence of economies of scale, whereas the investment share, openness and specialization play only a modest role in explaining cross-country variation in energy- and labour-productivity growth. Key words: convergence, energy productivity, labour productivity, sectoral analysis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1986), ‘Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind’, Journal of Economic History 47, 385-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abreu, M., H. L. F. Groot and R. J. G. M. Florax (2005), ‘A Meta-Analysis of β-Convergence: The Legendary 2%’, Journal of Economic Surveys 19(3), 389-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1991), ‘Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries’, Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics 106, 407-443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1992), ‘Convergence’, Journal of Political Economy 100, 223-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1995), Economic Growth, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B. and C. I. Jones (1996a), ‘Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries’, American Economic Review 86, 1216-1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B. and C. I. Jones (1996b), ‘Productivity across Industries and Countries: Time Series Theory and Evidence’, Review of Economics and Statistics 78, 135-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B. and C. I. Jones (2001), ‘Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries: Reply’, American Economic Review 91, 1168-1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B. and S. N. Durlauf (1996), ‘Interpreting Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis’, Jour-nal of Econometrics 71, 161-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. R. (1978), ‘Aggregate Energy, Efficiency, and Productivity Measurement’, Annual Review of Energy 3, 225-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadberry, S. N. (1996), ‘Convergence: What the Historical Record Shows’, in B. van Ark and N. Crafts, eds., Quantitative Aspects of Post-War European Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A. and M. S. Taylor (2004), The Green Solow Model, Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper 10557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. (1982), ‘Multivariate Regression Models for Panel Data’, Journal of Econometrics 18,5-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, M. (1992), ‘Convergence Clubs and Endogenous Growth’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 8, 57-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, C. J., R. K. Kaufmann and D. I. Stern (2000), ‘Aggregation and the Role of Energy in the Economy’, Ecological Economics 32, 301-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D. and E. N. Wolff (1988), ‘Convergence of Industry Labour Productivity among Advanced Economies, 1963-1982’, Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 549-558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D. and E. N. Wolff (1993), Competitiveness, Convergence, and International Specialization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N. and P. A. Johnson (1992), Local versus Global Convergence Across National Economies, Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper 3996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N. and D. Quah (1999), ‘New Empirics of Economic Growth’, in J. B. Taylor and M. Woodford, eds., Handbook of Macroeconomics, Volume 1. Amsterdam: North Holland Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Journal (1996), ‘Controversy on the Convergence and Divergence of Growth Rates’, Special Issue Economic Journal 106, 1016-1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1994), ‘Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates’, Journal of Eco-nomic Literature 32, 1147-1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1952), ‘Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective’, in B. Hoselitz, ed., The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. B., L. Schipper, P. A. Duerr and S. Strøm (1991), ‘Manufacturing Energy Use in 8 OECD Countries’, Energy Economics 13, 135-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1986), Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, N. (1995), ‘Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 4, 1127-1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, N. (2003), ‘What Have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate?’, Journal of Economic Surveys 17, 309-362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W. (1984), ‘The Role of Energy in Productivity Growth’, Energy Journal 5, 11-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, R. K. (2004), ‘The Mechanisms for Autonomous Energy Efficiency Increases: A Coin-tegration Analysis of the US Energy/GDP Ratio’, Energy Journal 25, 63-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (2002), ‘Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion’, American Economic Review 92, 120-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E.(1988),‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miketa, A. (2001), ‘Analysis of Energy Intensity Developments in Manufacturing Sectors in Indus-trialized and Developing Countries’, Energy Policy 29, 769-775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miketa, A. and P. Mulder (2005), ‘Energy Productivity across Developed and Developing Coun-tries in 10 Manufacturing Sectors: Patterns of Growth and Convergence’, Energy Economics 27, 429-453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, P. and H. L. F. de Groot (2003a), ‘International Comparisons of Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Performance. Stylised Facts and Decomposition of Trends’, CPB Discus-sion Paper 22, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, P. and H. L. F. de Groot (2003b), ‘Sectoral Energy- and Labour Productivity Convergence’, CPB Discussion Paper 23, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, P., H. L. F. de Groot and M. W. Hofkes (2003), ‘Explaining Slow Diffusion of Energy-Saving Technologies, A Vintage Model with Returns to Diversity and Learning-by-Using’, Resource and Energy Economics 25, 105-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1978), ‘On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data’, Econometrica 46, 69-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1993), ‘Galton’s Fallacy and Test of the Convergence Hypothesis’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95, 427-443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1997), ‘Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Polarization, Stratification, and Conver-gence Clubs’, Journal of Economic Growth 2, 27-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986), ‘Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002-1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990), ‘Endogenous Technological Change’, Journal of Political Economy 98, S71-S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L. and S. Meyers (1992), Energy Efficiency and Human Activity: Past Trends and Future Prospects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1956), ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, A. (2001), ‘Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement Across Industries and Countries: Comment’, American Economic Review 91, 1160-1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, T. W. (1956), ‘Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation’, Economic Record 32, 334-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unander, F., S. Karbuz, L. Schipper, M. Khrushch and M. Ting (1999), ‘Manufacturing Energy Use in OECD Countries: Decomposition of Long Term Trends’, Energy Policy 27, 769-778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ark, B. (1993), International Comparisons of Output and Productivity, Monograph Series no.1, Groningen, Growth and Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ark, B. and D. Pilat (1993), ‘Productivity Level in Germany, Japan, and the United States: Differences and Causes’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics 2, 1-46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mulder, P., Groot, H.L.F.D. (2007). Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence. In: Bretschger, L., Smulders, S. (eds) Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics. The Economics Of Non-Market Goods And Resources, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6293-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics