Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Economics Of Non-Market Goods And Resources ((ENGO,volume 10))

I develop a simple new growth model to demonstrate a mechanism through which environmental regulations can boost the growth rate of production towards its socially optimal level, a version of the Porter hypothesis. The mechanism is also likely to operate in much more complex economies, although the net effect of regulations will be uncertain in such economies. In the model, growth is driven by researchers striving for monopoly profits. New technologies must compete with the old for market share. They are not only more productive than the old, but also more environmentally friendly. Introduction of technology standards favours new technologies and therefore increases expected returns to research, hence the quantity of research – and the growth rate – in the economy goes up. This may be a social benefit if knowledge, which drives growth, is underprovided due to spillovers. Key words: endogenous growth, innovation, environment, Schumpeter, Porter hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1992), ‘A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction’, Econometrica, 60:323-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962),‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. L. and S. Smulders (1995), ‘Environmental Quality and Pollution-Augmenting Tech-nological Change in a Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model’, Journal of Public Economics, 57:369-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha-e-Sá , M. A. and A. B. Reis (2007), ‘Optimal Timing of Adoption of a Green Technology’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 36:35-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feichtinger, G. R. F. Hartl, P. M. Kort, and V. M. Veliov (2006), ‘Capital Accumulation Under Technological Progress and Learning: A Vintage Capital Approach’, European Journal of Operational Research, 172:293-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaud, A. (1999), ‘Pollution Permits and Sustainable Growth in a Schumpeterian Model’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38:249-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (2004),‘Growth, Environment and Innovation — A Model with Production Vintages and Environmentally Oriented Research’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(3):1078-1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, R. and J. J. Bial (2002), Inducing Innovation in the Environmental Technology of Oligopolis-tic Firms’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(3):265-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. and J. C. Williams (1998), Measuring the Social Return to R&D’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113:1119-1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. and J. C. Williams (2000), ‘Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D’, Journal of Economic Growth, 5:65-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, R. D. (2002), ‘Technical Change, External economies, and the Porter Hypothesis’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43(1):158-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995), ‘Toward a new Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4):97-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, F. (2007), ‘Environmental Policy and Growth when Inputs are Differentiated in Pollution Intensity’, Environmental and Resource Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1994),‘The Origins of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1):3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salop, S. C. and D. T. Scheffman (1983),‘Raising Rivals’ Costs’, American Economic Review, 73(2):267-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xepapadeas, A. and A. de Zeeuw (1999), ‘Environmental Policy and Competitiveness: the Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Manage-ment, 37(2):165-182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hart, R. (2007). Can Environmental Regulations Boost Growth?. In: Bretschger, L., Smulders, S. (eds) Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics. The Economics Of Non-Market Goods And Resources, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6293-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics