We study the optimal timing of adoption of a cleaner technology and its effects on the rate of growth of an economy in the context of an AK endogenous growth model. We show that the results depend upon the behavior of the marginal utility of environmental quality with respect to consumption. When it is increasing, we derive the capital level at the optimal timing of adoption.We show that this capital threshold is independent of the initial conditions on the stock of capital, implying that capital-poor countries tend to take longer to adopt. Also, country-specific characteristics, as the existence of high barriers to adoption, may lead to different capital thresholds for different countries. If the marginal utility of environmental quality decreases with consumption, a country should never delay adoption; the optimal policy is either to adopt immediately or, if adoption costs are “too high”, to never adopt. The policy implications of these results are discussed in the context of the international debate surrounding the environmental political agenda.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balvers, R. J. and J. H. Bergstrand (1997), ‘Equilibrium Real Exchange Rates: Closed-Form The-oretical Solutions and Some Empirical Evidence’, Journal of International Money and Finance 16 (3),345-366.
Bovenberg, A. L. and S. Smulders (1995), ‘Environmental Quality and Pollution-Augmenting Tech-nological Change in a Two-sector Endogenous Growth Model’, Journal of Public Economics 57, 369-391.
Brock, W. and M. S. Taylor (2003), ‘The Kindergarten Rule of Sustainable Growth’, NBER Working-Paper # 9597.
Brock, W. and M. S. Taylor (2004a), ‘Economic Growth and the Environment: A Review of Theory and Empirics’, NBER Working-Paper # 10854.
Brock, W. and M. S. Taylor (2004b), ‘The Green Solow Model’, NBER Working-Paper # 10557.
Chimeli, A. and J. Braden (2002), ‘Environmental Quality, Environmental Protection and Technology Adoption’, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, mimeo.
Dixit, A. and R. Pindyck (1994), Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Elbasha, E. H. and T. L. Roe (1996), ‘On Endogenous Growth: The Implications of Environmental Externalities’, Journal of Environmental Economics Management 31, 240-268.
Greenwood, J. and B. Jovanovic (2001), ‘Accounting for Growth’, in E. Dean, M. Harper and C. Hulten, eds., New Directions in Productivity Analysis, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 63. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Hall, B. H. and B. Khan (2003), ‘Adoption of New Technology’, NBER Working-Paper # 9730.
Issler, J. V. and N. S. Piqueira (2000), ‘Estimating Relative Risk Aversion, the Discount Rate, and the Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution in Consumption for Brazil Using Three Types of Utility Function’, Brazilian Review of Econometrics 20(2), 201-239.
Khan, A. and B. Ravikumar (2002), ‘Costly Technology Adoption and Capital Accumulation’, Review of Economics Dynamics 5, 489-502.
Michel, P. and G. Rotillon (1995), ‘Disutility of Pollution and Endogenous Growth’, Environmental and Resource Economics 6(3), 279-300.
OECD (2001), Environmental Goods and Services. The Benefits of Further Trade Liberalization. Paris: OECD.
Oxley, A. (2002), ‘Environment Protection and the WTO’, in MorrisJulian, ed., Sustainable Devel-opment: Promoting Progress or Perpetuating Poverty?. London: Profile Books.
Parente, S. (1994), ‘Technology Adoption, Learning by Doing, and Economic Growth’, Journal of Economic Theory 63, 346-369.
Reis, A. (2001), ‘Endogenous Growth and the Possibility of Eliminating Pollution’, Journal of Envi-ronmental Economics and Management 42, 360-373.
Romer, P. (1994), ‘New Goods, Old Theory, and The Welfare Costs of Trade Restrictions’, Journal of Development Economics 43, 5-38.
Seierstad, A. and K. Sydsaeter (1987), ‘Optimal Control Theory with Economic Applications’, in C.J.Bliss and M.D. Intrilligator, eds., Advanced Textbooks in Economics. North-Holland.
Stokey, N. (1998), ‘Are There Limits to Growth?’, International Economic Review 39, 1-31.
Teece, D. J. (1977), ‘Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transfer-ring Technological Know-How’, Economic Journal 87, 242-261. UN, Press Release (1999), SG/SM/7237.
UN, Press Release (1999), SG/SM/7237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cunha-e-Sá, M.A., Reis, A.B. (2007). The Optimal Timing of Adoption of a Green Technology. In: Bretschger, L., Smulders, S. (eds) Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics. The Economics Of Non-Market Goods And Resources, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6293-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6293-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6292-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6293-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)